|
February 7, 2000, 11:30 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 14, 1999
Posts: 1,573
|
I am considering trading a Single-Six .22 in for a .22 autoloader and have heard that the trigger on the Browning Buckmarks is better than the Ruger 22/45. Why is that so and ... this is why I am in this forum ... what would it take to "fix" the 22/45 trigger?
Thanks, saands |
|
|
February 8, 2000, 07:24 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 18, 2000
Posts: 43
|
Have a 22/45 that I use as practice before my 45's, have never had a problem with the trigger.
It has very little creep and breaks clean with some overtravel. Does not have a low poundage pull but that could probably be changed. Also, I think the Buckmark will cost more than the 22/45 so that may contribute some to the difference in triggers |
|
|
|
February 8, 2000, 07:39 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
I had an early 22/45 and had major problems out of the box with FTF. Called Ruger and sent it back and not only did they fix it, but they improved a very good trigger to a crisp 2 1/2 lb. and refunded my shipping! Can't tell you how, but it can be done. John
|
|
|
|
February 8, 2000, 07:50 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: February 7, 2000
Posts: 18
|
A good 'smith CAN improve the 22/45 trigger immeasureably. BT/DT.
------------------ Kurt V. Wala Kurt's Kustom Firearms www.kurtkustom.qpg.com/ |
|
|
|
February 8, 2000, 11:08 AM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 1999
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,135
|
I put a drop in accurizing kit in my 22/45 from www.volquartsen.com. Went in easy and made a dramatic improvement in trigger pull quality.
Cost of the kit plus the 22/45 was still less than a Buckmark Target. Good Luck... Joe ------------------ Go NRA |
|
|
 |
|
|
