April 19, 2011, 08:14 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: December 9, 2010
Posts: 63
|
Closing Threads
I've been an internet forum and bulletin board user for many years - on a very wide range of topics.
I'd be interested in people's thoughts on the concept of closing threads. In general I tend to find this behavior in gun and shooting forums more than in other topics I've experienced. Mind you - I hang out in TFL because I think it's done considerably less frequently here than other places I've been - but it's still > 0. I'm not knocking the moderators. I know you all put in lots of time and effort. I just find it intriguing that it seems our hobby tends to have forums that have this behavior while others do not. The other places I've been (the non-gun related ones) have moderators - but they tend to get involved only if something degrades to someone being really beligerent. And even then it's done through private messaging - MAYBE deleting a response or something like that. I think it's fair to say the community learns of the action only if they notice something has been deleted or the person reprimanded reports that they were contacted by the moderator. It seems to me if something is off topic or stupid or doesn't "get legs" it will die a natural death (i.e. "close") on it's own. OR |
April 19, 2011, 09:38 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,947
|
I won't give a long and drawn out answer to the question. Suffice it to say that TFL is a closely moderated forum and as such we will close/edit/delete wherever and whenever we see that the threads or posts require it.
We might close threads more frequently than those other forums you frequent because we try to stay ahead of the bickering that is inherent in almost any topic you can mention. In other words we are proactive instead of reactive. If the subject of a thread is off topic for TFL or is "stupid" as you put it, we will close it on sight. We've found that such threads don't die a natural death, but some, otherwise good, members who participate in them will die an unnatural death by banishment. We honestly try to avoid that, and if closing a thread prematurely, by your reckoning, is the cost, then so be it. |
April 19, 2011, 09:38 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Posts: 637
|
9 times out of 10, I agree with the staff; its for the greater good.
Once in a while.... I don't agree, just happened a day or two ago here. A member here was "ripped off" in an online gun part purchase. Thread got closed. His experience and thread might have saved another gun owner from a similar outcome. Certainly seemed firearms related to me despite some tangents other folks were commenting on. All in all I think the staff here has created a tremendous resource for us all here and if the occasional egg needs to be broken so we can have an omelet, I can live with that.
__________________
Maintaining a constant state of cat-like readiness and a heightened state of suspicious alertness. |
April 19, 2011, 09:40 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 3, 2010
Location: SW. Florida
Posts: 135
|
I agree, it drives me crazy too! Try as I may to like TFL the excessive moderator intervention makes it impossible to enjoy it in the way I should be able to. I rarely sign-on and participate as a result.
__________________
Fear is a reaction................Courage is a decision! |
April 19, 2011, 02:14 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 14, 2010
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,824
|
I'm a Mod on a few different forums, I've yet to see the Mods on here bin/close a thread without reason. Read and follow the rules and they'll be no problems.
__________________
Chief stall mucker and grain chef Country don't mean dumb. Steven King. The Stand |
April 19, 2011, 09:24 PM | #6 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
|
I think I speak for the other mods when I say that I'd much rather read and respond to threads than edit or lock them.
I didn't come to TFL a decade ago to deal with problem threads and problem users, I came here because I liked the information interchange and the interaction with the members. Frankly the mod duties interfere with that. I lock threads or edit them to keep them from getting worse and I do it when I figure it's the only way to avoid more cleanup work and more problems later. And I realize while I'm doing it that some folks are going understand why it's happening and and others won't. Closing notes are always good, but sometimes it's not really possible to fully explain the entire rationale for a lock without writing a book.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
April 19, 2011, 09:34 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2009
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
follow the rules and regs not everyone likes "reality forums" just informational ones and ones without all THE DRAMA....... |
|
April 20, 2011, 12:21 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: The retarded place below Idaho
Posts: 1,408
|
I think most people who regularly post on TFL know why a thread gets locked without the closing note.
I much prefer the proactive mods, this forum isn't here to bash on others.
__________________
The best shot I ever made was an accident |
April 20, 2011, 03:02 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
The mods do a fine job. When they close a thread, it's usually obvious why they did so.
If you can give reasons why a thread should be reopened, you can PM the mod who closed it. I've done it now and then, and a couple of times the thread was reopened... I suspect it helps to have good reasons, and to be polite...
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
April 20, 2011, 03:15 PM | #10 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
The whining about thread closing is so tiresome as to be nauseating already.
WilditsanonproblemAlaska ™©2002-2011 |
April 20, 2011, 03:38 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2010
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 576
|
The way this forum is moderated is the only reason I still stop by. I am a member on 10 different forums on several different topics & active on 6 of them. Mostly for the quest of knowledge. The ones that I just stop by regulary are strictly moderated! I value your opinion on my topic, not on my opinion! The forums that aren't moderated never fails to host a keyboard terrorist! You know the ones, they are 10ft tall & bullet proof behind a keyboard! When they start barking I leave! I don't care for the drama either. If I had to vote for more or less moderation on TFL, it would be for more! Play by the rules, or don't play!! Mods, thank you for what you do!!
__________________
~ "JJ" |
April 20, 2011, 04:01 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2010
Location: Greenacres, FL
Posts: 933
|
I've been a mod on another forum for a couple of years now. Stuff happens that regular members don't see/hear. Mods don't act arbitrarily, they discuss what they do between the team. TFL runs a tight ship and they do it very well.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
April 20, 2011, 05:16 PM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
Quote:
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
|
April 22, 2011, 07:53 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
|
I've been a mod on several gun forums, mostly black powder forums that went under for one reason or another. I never understood locking a thread for getting off topic. If the thread has any further value it will get back on topic on it's own. If it doesn't it's fun to see where it ends up sometimes.
|
April 22, 2011, 03:38 PM | #15 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
|
"If the thread has any further value it will get back on topic on it's own. If it doesn't it's fun to see where it ends up sometimes. "
In my nearly 20 years experience in posting on electronic bulletin boards, threads that veer off topic normally do not go back on topic without direct and pointed intervention from either dedicated members or staff. At its very heart, TFL is a focused discussion board. Discussion works best when it remains focused. That's why we have sections broken down by firearm types and disciplines. That's why we've also started taking a harder line against those who post handgun discussions in the wrong handgun board. TFL's focused discussion nature also tends to preclude both "letting threads flow to see where they will go" and any support at all for an "off topic" discussions board.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
April 22, 2011, 06:56 PM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
And to pile on Mike's point of focused discussion: We pride ourselves in having this board as a reliable source of information. Performing searches on a subject is quite the nightmare with threads riddled with useless noise. We try to separate the wheat from the chaff so researchers don't have to nearly as much.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
April 22, 2011, 08:46 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: December 9, 2010
Posts: 63
|
Shane:
The point you make in your most recent post is excellent. When searching for information it is tough to find a thread that is 4+ pages long and have to go through it all to see where the nugget of gold is. Thanks for all the replies. My question, in general, wasn't centered (or meant to be centered) on when threads get closed or for what reason. I understand there are rules and violating, in all likelihood, will cause a thread to get closed. I was just curious/observing the fact that guns/shooting *as a category* seems to have this practice more so than other hobbies/subjects. Thanks again. OR |
April 22, 2011, 09:02 PM | #18 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
|
"I was just curious/observing the fact that guns/shooting *as a category* seems to have this practice more so than other hobbies/subjects."
Well, in my view, a lot of that is simply because other hobbies/subjects don't have the kind of negative "press" associated with them. In general, I think it behooves firearms boards to take a much more... professional, for lack of a better word... stance when it comes to discussion. A case in point is the thread this evening asking about the best gun for pistol whipping. A thread like that simply will not stand. It's an idiotic question on its very face, it paints all gun owners in a very poor light, and in probably the vast majority of scenarios where someone is beaten with a gun, it involves an illegal act, i.e., assault. Such topics will always be closed at TFL.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
April 22, 2011, 09:35 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: December 9, 2010
Posts: 63
|
Mike:
Excellent point. Thanks. OR |
April 23, 2011, 03:19 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2008
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,436
|
I frequent a few other gun/outdoors forums, and I prefer TFL because of the close moderation.
If you have a valid point to argue, you won't have a problem here. If you simply wish to spew vitriol and hate, you're not going to be here long. I come here because it's a place for serious discussion, while allowing for a little bit of humor. The unmoderated/loosely moderated boards are OK if that's what you want, but quickly degenerate into folks trading insulting posts and I just don't care for that. I've certainly made my share of tongue in cheek posts here, but I don't insult other posters and I'm happy with the way the board is moderated.
__________________
Just remember, when you pull the trigger, the bullets come out going very, very fast. So make sure to keep the weapon pointing away from you. |
April 23, 2011, 06:54 AM | #21 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
|
Shane also makes an excellent point as for why we try to keep threads on topic.
The "information database" aspect of TFL isn't maintained by accident. Old threads are not deleted because of the wealth of information that can be found here. No, not every thread is filled with gold, but lots of them are, which is the biggest reason why we encourage people to search TFL liberally. We understand that the vBulletin search isn't particularly awesome, but it's usable. Google's advanced search does an excellent job of pulling up threads. It's expensive to maintain an ever-growing data repository. Members are very fortunate that TFL's founder is both committed to maintaining this site's history and is footing the entire bill for this place. Members have never been asked to kick in a penny for daily operations, and you'll also notice that, with the exception of the links page, there are no ads here. Rich Lucibella deserves everyone's gratitude for both his generosity and his commitment to the shooting sports.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
May 4, 2011, 02:25 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 5, 2011
Location: here
Posts: 551
|
This thread was closed
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=449742 I get that TFL is private, we're all here as guests and we agree to abide by the rules of the site as interpreted by the Mods. That policy should continue and TFL is usually well controlled and not heavy handed. But the closing of this thread is heavy handed. The question posed by the OP leads directly to politics. Abortion and other political matters were posited as example or analogy intended to illustrate thought on the topic. In no way could this be construed to lead off topic because the initial poll created by the OP included politics as an answer. Either the thread should have been closed immediately as inappropriate, or it should still be open. We are not kindergarteners. This is not the YMCA. I think you are wrong here Mod. I think the thread should be re-opened.
__________________
"Me fail English? That's un-possible!" --Ralph Wiggum "A woman drove me to drink and I didn't even have the decency to thank her"-- W.C Fields |
May 4, 2011, 05:37 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Lawnboy, see my post #9, above. I think it's more polite to question such decisions privately, rather than in the open forum.
Although I suspect you'll find the response to be something along the lines of
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
May 4, 2011, 06:38 PM | #24 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
Quote:
Here's where you're off-base. 1. The OP did NOT lead to the nature of politics not allowed here. Members that post political content that isn't allowed in a thread is what lead to closing. 2. The nature of politics that aren't allowed here leads to members acting like kindergardeners. We have LOADS of threads in our archives, which prove this as a cold hard fact. 3. You're confusing the difference in discussing law & civil rights regarding what the government involvement is and pure politics. 4. In my observation, Glenn smelled a thread about to go sour based on his experience as Staff. He nipped it in the bud. The ruling was sound and stands as Glenn saw fit....unless he decides to reconsider. Oh, and Vanya's example is the perfect example of the practice.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
|
May 4, 2011, 07:09 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Shane has it nailed. The OP may have led to politics but we let it go a bit. When Obama and abortion enters the debate - it's going to lead to some firestorm and ranting/raving posts. It is not our mission to referee such and TFL is not about that.
Even using an analogy can start the brush fire. Perhaps we should have closed it immediately. But logic dictates that the letting it go for a bit does not precludes a later close or demand a reopening. I would remind folks that this is a voluntary activity and just as you don't have to watch the View or watch MTV, if you don't like us - there are other wild and wooly gun forums full of ranting, raving and profanity. I would also remind folks that the moderators bring considerable expertise and time to this enterprise as volunteers. Engaging in a close quarter hermeneutic examination of posts to distinguish between analogy and politics and forbidden subjects demands my salary be tripled.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
|
|