|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 11, 2007, 12:46 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 6, 2007
Posts: 132
|
Has Anyone Else Found This
I just opened up a package of Winchester bulk bullets I purchased a long time ago, and just never got around to using. I quickly discovered these have the same defects that were the reason I haven’t bought Winchester bulk bullets for the last ten years.
These are 158 gr. .357 caliber JHP’s, and if you can see in the picture the cannelures on the bullets are placed in wildly differing locations. This makes it mandatory to sort the things before you can even reload them, and of course the loads will vary widely due to the extreme differences in seating depth if you were to roll crimp in the groove. Has anyone else found this defect in Winchester bulk bullets before, or have they gotten a little better over the last few years. This seems to be quite a variance from lot to lot, and undoubtedly why they were so inexpensive. Before I ever buy any more I am going to examine the bag a lot more closely. |
July 11, 2007, 03:43 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
Good grief! That's insane!
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
July 11, 2007, 04:04 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2005
Location: Youngtown Arizona
Posts: 1,135
|
nice
|
July 11, 2007, 04:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
So, WCW,
What has Winchester said about your photo? You did complain to them so they know there's a problem, right?
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
July 11, 2007, 05:01 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
|
I am not at all surprised. In the last few years most of the Win components I have purchased have been a huge disappointment. Especially their Brass.
|
July 11, 2007, 09:54 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 804
|
I don't know where you bought them but the good folks at Midway would gladly exchange them for you if you think that's where they came from. Midway stands behind all of the things they sell and issues like this are resolved quickly with just an email. Midway isn't always the cheapest but if you have problems- they take care of business. Otherwise, I'd contact Winchester. I can't believe they would expect you to keep an obviously bad product.
|
July 12, 2007, 12:54 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2006
Location: WA, the left armpit of the USA
Posts: 1,323
|
I've seen that in cheap bullets in other brands as well, not to mention wild variations in weight and roundness, jackets, etc.
I have yet to meet the person who could successfully refute the truth of the old saw: "you gets what you pays for." You did say thay were bulk and not match(ed) bullets, yes?
__________________
"If the enemy is in range, so are you." - Infantry Journal |
July 12, 2007, 01:08 AM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 17, 2006
Posts: 46
|
Big Deal.
Send the unused portion my way and I'll load them up and show you the 50 yard results. It will make you feel better.
|
July 12, 2007, 06:19 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2006
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 506
|
I have been buying bulk packed Remington 158 grain JHP's from the gun shows and I noticed that in some batches I get the cannelure is not symetrical(sp) around the bullet. It is sometimes a "wavy" line around those bullets. Thankfully it is not off real bad and the crimp fits all around OK. I guess it's one of those, "you get what you pay for" deals.
__________________
5.56mm, reach out and touch something. .458 SOCOM,reach out and knock something down. M70 Web Page |
July 12, 2007, 11:02 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: June 18, 2007
Location: Clover South Carolina
Posts: 62
|
I hadn't noticed any , but this is going to make me look a little closer Thanks
|
July 13, 2007, 12:48 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2006
Location: BETWEEN TN & KY
Posts: 1,758
|
Some body did not set up their machine properly. Not good!
__________________
Have a nice day! |
July 13, 2007, 02:31 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Do you think the folks at Winchester and/or Remington sell bullets to support reloaders' efforts? They sell seconds, short runs, and off-spec bullets. That is why they are so cheap. Do you really expect seconds to be the same as premium bullets? Really?
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
July 13, 2007, 09:02 PM | #13 | |||
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
|||
July 13, 2007, 10:37 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 26, 2000
Location: Hastings, Nebrasksa - the Hear
Posts: 2,209
|
Ignore the cannelure.
Seat them all to the same depth and crimp them with the Lee Factory die. Unless the weights vary significantly. Allow me this question: Are these bullets intended for serious target work? Anything past 25 yards or so? If not, I doubt if the accuracy will show much damage.
__________________
There ain't no free lunch, except Jesus. Archie Check out updated journal at http://oldmanmontgomery.wordpress.com/ |
|
|