|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 28, 2009, 12:21 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 3, 2008
Posts: 1
|
The Benefits of Personal Protection
Here's an article in today's Atlanta newspaper that might be of interest. Personal protection,......because you just never know! Unfortunately, the way things are going in our current society and with with "Steve Urkel" in the White House, this will probably become an increasing trend. "I'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it!"
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...ge_tab_newstab |
February 28, 2009, 09:59 PM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Posts: 70
|
Cliffs
Quote:
__________________
Μολὼν λάβε |
|
February 28, 2009, 10:36 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
My question is: What are the legal ramifications here? The homeowner shot and killed a person immediatly after they kicked in the door and entered the premisis. What will the DA's office do? The article said that the homeowner was not charged in the incident. I'm glad, but surprised. From what I have read, I was under the impression that even if you are defending your home and kill someone, you are automatically under investigation. I am completely on the side of the homeowner, please understand that. I am just trying to figure out what the legal steps are in a case like this. Anyone have any insight, here? |
|
February 28, 2009, 10:49 PM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: November 14, 2008
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
|
|
February 28, 2009, 11:17 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: December 13, 2008
Posts: 29
|
LOL owned
|
February 28, 2009, 11:30 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
|
|
March 1, 2009, 12:38 AM | #7 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
While self defense is, in and of itself, a civil right, the discussion in the OP is not about a legal or civil right issue.
Closed for being off topic. |
|
|