The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 9, 2005, 11:41 PM   #26
45 Fu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 422
Overpopulation is a self-correcting problem, but how much suffering should we allow while things correct themselves? I prefer a solution to the problem that allows for those things which are going to die to do it quickly and in a manner that is as painless as possible.


I kill because I, in one way or another, do so to conform my surroundings to my liking (pest removal), to fill my belly (hunting), or to save my life. I am the top of the food chain. If the animals were smart enough they would turn the tables but, until then, I will continue to do what man does to be comfortable, safe, and well fed.
__________________
The pen is mightier than the sword - unless you are facing a man armed with a sword, then the pen is pretty much useless. 45 Fu
45 Fu is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 02:22 AM   #27
Lawyer Daggit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2004
Posts: 1,181
Why I kill

It occurs incidental to the hunt- I once helped a farmer slaughter stock during a drought and I felt really uncomfortable doing it and had dreams for weeks afterwards.

When it occurs incidentally to the hunt it is part of life- and tasteful.

Incidentally I take meat from what I shoot to eat and try not to waste and treat game taken with dignity.

A greeny would not understand what I am saying but I am sure you guys do.
Lawyer Daggit is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 06:01 AM   #28
Ohio Annie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 351
It's important to realize that death by starvation is a SLOW and PAINFUL process, so much so that when people allow domestic animals to starve they are charged with cruelty to animals.
__________________
Annie @8-)
Maker of fine GSR since 1998
Ohio Annie is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 08:49 AM   #29
Rojoe67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Wolverine State
Posts: 767
Well said Annie......

I think the Buckeye has said what we all can agree the best two sentences on this topic...... Well said - it is just that simple too.....

*Annie congrats on another great NCAA football year... if your a Buckeye fan?
Rojoe67 is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 12:15 PM   #30
Steve499
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Central Missouri
Posts: 533
It's a food chain thing, you know, we're at the top of it.
Steve499 is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 12:47 PM   #31
FirstFreedom
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
First, with respect to eating them. No it's not necessary to live, but there are reasons:

1. I agree that harvesting an animal from the wild is in a sense morally superior (IMO) to eating meat from animals raised in farms, in little cages, in terrible conditions, genetically engineered to the point where they can't walk from having such meaty bodies, etc. At least the critters I harvest had their lives up to that point to live free, and naturally. And they have a pretty decent chance of living their entire lives without being shot. No so for captive-raised meat consumed by the public. You could make a pretty decent argument that eating commercial meat is immoral, whereas hunting is not.

2. In addition, the meat I eat from wild animals is not contaminated with tons o' antibiotics and such that are injected into commerically raised animals. Plus, they're much leaner. As a result, it's arguable healthier. Perhaps not as healthy as a vegetarian diet, but healthier than commercial meat, IMO.

3. There's a certain definite satisfaction from eating game that you've harvested with your own hand. Very mentally satisfying. This must be a primal urge, dating back to cavemen days. Stronger in men than women, but present in some women too.

4. If you're really good, and hunt enough, you can actually save money over store-bought meat prices in the long run, once you've reached the break-even point and covered the initial outlay cost of your gear (guns, hunting equip, etc.). Granted, the venison I've eaten is well over $100/pound, when you factor this stuff in, but over my lifetime, that unit cost will come down, down, down, and eventually be a plus instead of a minus financially (or so I would like to think - provided I don't pay for a bunch of fancy guided hunts in AK, Can, Africa, etc. - then my meat would be very expensive indeed)

Next, to control pests/varmints:

-Many species are devastating irritants to our livestock, crops, infrastructure, pets, etc., and need to be culled to varying degrees, and some to the largest extent possible without making them become endangered, in many people's opinions anyway, including coyotes, crows, beavers, feral pigs, nutria, mice & rats, prairie dogs, moles, and other rodentia. Perhaps arguably skunks, though I don't view skunks as a problem. I suppose they can carry rabies, but so can dogs for that matter. Deer are also a nuisance in a sense, as mentioned, due to the ticks they carry and spread, and the cause of motor vehicle accidents.
FirstFreedom is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 03:08 PM   #32
OBIWAN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,340
Because merely wounding the animal is inhumane
OBIWAN is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 03:45 PM   #33
Jan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Posts: 101
Rojoe67, you dont have to buy leather, there are other materials available.
as for the paper bit ,very funny !
Jan is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 03:55 PM   #34
Jan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Posts: 101
joab, firstly the reason for 2 threads, was because i wasnt sure exactly where i would get the best response, i am new here.

2nd, i dont pay anyone to kill for me.
only meat i eat, is chicken , and turkey at xmas. these birds have been reared free range so i pay extra money for them, so in effect the extra money i pay ensures they have lived a free from suffering life.
Jan is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 04:27 PM   #35
357MagFan
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 205
Jan...do you work for peta? Trust me your wasting your time and effort
357MagFan is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 04:31 PM   #36
Cowled_Wolfe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2004
Location: Washington... Land of the apple, and the apple maggot!
Posts: 803
Lemme quote Alton Brown, host of "Good Eats" on the food network... Context: He's answering the question of "Do you buy free range chickens?"

"There's nothing wrong with a free range chicken. I just can't find anybody I respect who can actually tell me there's anything really better about a free range chicken. You know, the fact that a chicken's got a little bitty square space that they can walk around, or that they throw the door open on the chicken house so that they can go out. Well guess what, chickens don't like going out, they like staying in; so I don't know. Higher quality feed is certainly an issue. I mean, the better food the chicken is gonna get, or any other animal for that matter, the better it's gonna taste. So I certainly won't say no to free range chicken, but I'm also not gonna pay that much extra for it. Untill somebody convinces me otherwise."

Emphasis is mine.

Btw, I'd like to know how you know the farm is treating the chickens nicely. Do you ever visit the farm? Do you ever visit the slaughterhouse to make sure they're gentle about cutting the heads off?
__________________
[Your ad could be here! Call 555-0122 for details.]

(\__/)
(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into
(")_(")your signature to help him gain world domination.
Cowled_Wolfe is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 05:11 PM   #37
joab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2002
Location: Orl Fla
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
i dont pay anyone to kill for me.
So you buy your free ranged chickens live?
Or do you buy them already slaughtered?
Do you think the man that did the killing did it for the thrill or for pay?

If you truly believe that eating meat or using dead animal products is wrong then practice veganism.

If you don't believe that doing so is wrong then don't try to take some moral highroad about how some choose to obtain that dead flesh.

If you pay for dead meat then you have also paid into the system that creates dead meat.

This may surprise and even horrify you to learn, but the only way to create dead meat is to kill something with meat on it.

If you buy that dead meat from the person who created that dead meat or from the person who bought it from the person who created that dead meat then you have paid somebody to do something you don't have the stomach to do for your self i.e. KILL
Thereby maintaining your ability to look down your nose at those who create your dead meat and also those that create their own dead meat

And fair enough to the answer to question 1
__________________
Joab the Bugman
Founding member- Lords of Pomposity
It's a Yankee Doodle thing
joab is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 06:04 PM   #38
jailmedic
Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2004
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 90
Tee-hee....

Jan buys a special breed of free-range chickens bred to grow to a certain size then commit chicken-suicide, thereby relieving him/her of any guilt from the idea that he/she might have actually paid a part of his/her purchase price for someone to kill for him/her.....
I'm fairly certain that Jan has never eaten an elk tenderloin.... he/she would most likely switch teams......
jailmedic is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 06:15 PM   #39
Jan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Posts: 101
357magfan. no i dont belong to peta.
Jan is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 06:17 PM   #40
Jan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Posts: 101
jailmedic, didnt realize this was a game.
Jan is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 06:22 PM   #41
Jan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Posts: 101
joab, what i should have said was that i used to buy free range chickens, but have actually stopped because the shop stopped stocking them.
so i really only buy one free range turkey a year, as i can get that from another shop.

all ive done is ask a question

i think your a bit ott, but thats just my opinion.
Jan is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 06:24 PM   #42
jailmedic
Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2004
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 90
a little humor.....

You know, humor?
It is a terrible flaw to take oneself too seriously.....
You don't like hunting? Don't hunt.
If you can come up with a clever, humorous remark about those of us who do shoot and kill things and then eat them, I'll laugh right along with you....
jailmedic is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 06:25 PM   #43
Jan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Posts: 101
cowled wolf, the chickens were monitored by an animal welfare body.
Jan is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 06:26 PM   #44
jailmedic
Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2004
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 90
BTW, Jan

Have you ever had elk tenderloin?
I mean.... a free range elk.......
jailmedic is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 07:05 PM   #45
grey_pilgrim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Location: mid-atlantic
Posts: 352
Jan, it comes down to these reasons:

1)I like hunting and
2) If hunting is wrong, its just as wrong as any other type of slaughtering of animals, humane or no.

People often say "if you are going to eat meat, should go to a slaughterhouse and watch <insert animal here> being slaughtered, so you know what it involves"

The people who hunt here have "gone to a slaughterhouse" many times. Every time they kill a big game animal, in fact. People have said this before, and i'll say it again: I don't see what makes hunting worse than what goes on at a slaughterhouse.

We aren't built like the herbivores.

But you are perfectly within your rights not to hunt and not to eat meat . . . so long as you don't try to take hunting away from us.
grey_pilgrim is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 07:12 PM   #46
Cowled_Wolfe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2004
Location: Washington... Land of the apple, and the apple maggot!
Posts: 803
Quote:
cowled wolf, the chickens were monitored by an animal welfare body.
And what body is that? What farm did the chickens come from?

If you're going to give me a response, make it in full with details and all... Otherwise, I'm inclined to see you as pulling on my leg.
__________________
[Your ad could be here! Call 555-0122 for details.]

(\__/)
(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into
(")_(")your signature to help him gain world domination.
Cowled_Wolfe is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 07:15 PM   #47
joab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2002
Location: Orl Fla
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
i think your a bit ott, but thats just my opinion
And I think you have proven yourself to be a bit hypocritical, but that's just my opinion.

Either you are against killing animals or you are not.
If you are then you could not condone killing in any form.
Instead you use some pathetic and weak argument that the animal that was killed for your benefit was not kept in a cage before you had it snatched up by the feet , plopped down across a chopping block, and beheaded while scraming in disbelief that the people who had treated it so humanely were now executing it.
I know 'cause I've done it so some self righteous goof could feel good about not buying grocer meat

Somehow to you that is better than a wild animal who has never even seen a cage and has lived his entire life as nature intended dying at the hands of a superior predator, which as every deer but Bambi was taught by their mother is also in nature's plan
__________________
Joab the Bugman
Founding member- Lords of Pomposity
It's a Yankee Doodle thing

Last edited by joab; January 10, 2005 at 08:35 PM.
joab is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 07:44 PM   #48
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,899
Wow. Lots of people attacking Jan. No need for that, friends! She did just ask a question. No need to get defensive. I for one am secure enough in my actions and philosophy to respond without animosity at the mere question.

Jan says that she is willing to pay extra for free-range chickens and turkeys, so that her prey lived without suffering and lived healthier. Frankly, I think that's admirable: anyone who's ever seen what conditions most market chickens live in knows that they're usually packed intolerably tight, in unsanitary conditions, and are fed some unhealthy (for us) feed.

But here's the thing: all of the meat that I harvest in a fair chase is "free range". It's all eaten healthy foods. It all lived happily in its natural environment before I took it humanely.
  • What's the moral difference between buying a "free range" turkey and shooting one in the wild?
  • What's the moral difference between buying a "free range" chicken and shooting a quail in the field? (Other than the fact that the quail tastes better.)
  • What's the moral differance between buying (and thus killing) a chicken and buying a cow? (And you may rest assured, most cattle I've ever seen in my life here in Texas are "free range" until they go to the feed lots in the last couple of weeks.)
  • If a cow, why not a deer?
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________
Long Path is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 07:49 PM   #49
Mannlicher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2001
Location: North Central Florida & Miami
Posts: 3,209
why don't ya go troll somewhere else? well, why? I think "Better Homes and Gardens" might be a friendlier place for someone that has to question why folks hunt, on a gun board.
__________________
Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.".........Ronald Reagan
Mannlicher is offline  
Old January 10, 2005, 08:32 PM   #50
joab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2002
Location: Orl Fla
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
No need to get defensive.
Perhaps it's because we have been to the sister thread and read more of what was implied by both questions
Quote:
you say kill or be killed, i dont understand. no animal will attack me in my home, so this must mean that i would have to go find them in their natural habitat, so they can be killed.personally i dont think thats fair.
Quote:
im talking about killing, creeping up on something thats doing no harm to you, and wiping it out.
Quote:
,i understand that if that is the only food you can get. i wouldnt expect anyone to starve. but on the whole most of us can buy or grow food, i dont buy much meat, only buy it if i know its been treated well in life.
And this response to a post that made no mention of killing being funny
Quote:
old fud, so you find it funny to kill,
The question was indeed clear and simple as was the agenda behind it
__________________
Joab the Bugman
Founding member- Lords of Pomposity
It's a Yankee Doodle thing
joab is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10679 seconds with 8 queries