|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 22, 2015, 06:27 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
|
9mm reloading; using what I have.
My shotshell reloading hobby means I have red dot, 700X and even a jar of American Select at hand. My immediate availability projectiles (not yet bought) are Hornady 115 gn and Winchester 124gn jacketed (FMJ in both cases IIRC). I do not as yet have brass (can scavenge) or primers.
Does anyone out there know of suitable recipes? |
August 22, 2015, 07:20 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2013
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 329
|
https://www.hodgdon.com/basic-manual-inquiry.html
I would strongly suggest you procure a loading manual as well and read through it before you create rounds. Please be careful out there.
__________________
non ministrari sed ministrare |
August 22, 2015, 07:33 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,176
|
I've had good success with 700-X and 124gr copper coated bullets from Extreme Bullets. Makes a nice, reliable, inexpensive plinking/target round.
|
August 23, 2015, 12:05 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
|
Mark Glazer, I have substantial experience with bottle neck rifle cartridges, but this will be my first straight walled pistol cartridge. I have several loading manuals, and you can be sure I will be reading them carefully before I load the first round.
|
August 23, 2015, 01:25 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
The 700X will do nicely for both cast and jacketed. So with the Select. Oddly, Alliant doesn't give any 9mm data with Red Dot. Might be just the site though.
Only ever use Bullseye for the same reason you're using those powders. S'what I have. My Inglis BHP is not up to great accuracy either.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
August 23, 2015, 06:10 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 29, 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,325
|
I load 9mm 124 jacketed bullets with 4.0 - 4.5 grains of Red Dot.
|
August 24, 2015, 04:42 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,176
|
I forgot to mention one thing with the 700-X, it doesn't meter the best so I tap the powder measure with my finger three times on the up stroke and on the down stroke and get good consistent loads. This is with the Lee Pro Auto Disc, the cavity I use is just small enough that occasionally the powder will bridge a bit without tapping it.
|
August 25, 2015, 03:05 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 6,876
|
Quote:
I just had what I consider a big issue trying to stop bullet set back in a 1911 . I could not and when I say I couldn't I mean it . I crimped the hell out of the bullet and still got set back .005 each time tested using a bullet comparator to measure . I started a few threads on some forums and pretty much what I got was "deal with it " . I'd be freaking out if my 308 , 270 , 223 , 30-30 , 5.56 loads were getting .005 of bullet set back and still am a little about these pistol rounds . But wait there's more . So I start to load lead bullets and they are a whole different ball game it seems . Need a good charge to not lead barrel , to much crimp /to little crimp , Flare is not enough shaving lead off bullet , oh no now to much flare . Mix brass it does not matter , no no never mix brass Calgon take me away Anyways I don't remember so many things to think about when I started loading for my rifles . So yes read up and test some dummy rounds before you start charging the cases .
__________________
If Jesus had a gun , he'd probably still be alive ! I almost always write my posts regardless of content in a jovial manor and intent . If that's not how you took it , please try again . |
|
October 18, 2015, 10:11 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
|
Okay, long time no see, but update: got in touch with Hodgdon after Winchester and Hornady were both less than helpful, and I now have load data they gave me based on "bullets of similar construction". All is good there. I intend to load five at minimum then five each 0.2 and 0.4gn above that, so long as I am still 0.2gn below maximum. That should keep me safe-ish, but any hints on pressure signs in the 9mm would be helpful. Needless to say, I will be firing for function at first, so close I can't miss, to ensure that the bullets have left the barrel. Once that is established, I can start accuracy testing.
The Hornady bullets have a published oAL but the Winchesters don't, so I'll be trying max listed OAL first unless that seats the bullet out too far to hold in the case well or causes feed issues, then I'll seat halfway to putting the parallel part of the projectile all in and adjust from there. |
October 18, 2015, 01:45 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
|
What gun will be shooting these?
Quote:
The good news is, most modern 9mm's are built with a good deal of "headroom." I have never had a problem by following published data. Now I don't build hotrod ammo. But I have built some 9mm ammo with recipes that slightly exceed max published data, and have never had any problem. As long as you're following published data from a reliable source; and your loading techinque is good, you should be fine. Doing load workups is always a leap of faith. The best you can do is make that leap distance as short as possible.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
|
October 18, 2015, 01:56 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
|
As far as I am aware, my gun is brand new, so if its recoil spring is not healthy or of correct poundage I should be very displeased. I've been shooting factory loads in it, at least until such time as I was sure I was happy with the accuracy and function, and I shall keep on using it for some time as a reference standard, but I'm never happier than when shooting my own ammo - and eventually I will move on to casting.
|
October 18, 2015, 07:12 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
You sound as if you are not up to speed when it comes to high pressure pistol rounds where a small difference in powder or OAL can mean a bug difference. IF that assumption is correct, read a lot before you proceed.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
July 9, 2016, 06:27 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
|
Final update: Lee's Modern Reloading (Second Edition) came to the rescue, with 700X loads for both 115gn and 124gn generic (no specific projectile/manufacturer named) jacketed bullets. For both it recommends just north of 4gn or 0.5cc of 700X, and the 0.5 scoop. These are recommended START loads.
Unless someone can come up with a good reason why I shouldn't, I am going to climb the ladder to this from where I am now and see what happens. |
July 9, 2016, 06:47 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2015
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,203
|
Whoa there! Don't be in such a rush!
|
July 10, 2016, 06:30 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,176
|
I've been shooting 700X in my 9mm for over two years and at least 2000 rounds with no problem. The only problem is that it doesn't meter well through some powder measures, but works fine in my Lee Auto Drum. Before I started using the Loadmaster with the Auto Drum I used to load on a single station and used the Lee Perfect Powder measure but I had to tap it on both the upstroke and downstroke to be consistent.
|
July 11, 2016, 04:42 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
|
Thanks for that hint - I have the PPM, which I will be using when I'm not weighing each charge for load development. I've been in the habit of giving it a nice sharp tap against the stop at both ends with rifle powders anyway, but thanks for the reminder.
|
|
|