|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 23, 2013, 03:14 PM | #51 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
Is the 380 Still Going Strong?
Quote:
|
|
March 24, 2013, 10:51 AM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Quote:
There may be sites on the internet where the "conventional wisdom" is that "If you're not packing at least a .45 ACP or a 10mm, you may as well just throw the gun at the bad guy rather than shooting him", but this isn't one of those places. |
|
March 24, 2013, 10:55 AM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2012
Posts: 1,031
|
If there was a gunfight I'd run away from it.
If I had to defend myself with a gun I'd want a Colt 6940 with iron sights. If it had to be a handgun, I'd pick 1911 45 ACP--preferably a series 70 in full 5". If I had to carry it all day long, I'd go to a 4.25" Commander. If I wanted more bullets for some reason, I'd get a 9mm Hi-Power or a P226. If for some reason I was told I had no option but to carry a gun that fits in the pocket of my pants, wasn't allowed to wear loose clothing, a holster, or a belt, I'd go with a 380. |
March 24, 2013, 11:06 AM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
Is the 380 Still Going Strong?
Quote:
Also, "stop percentages" are a statistic that has been proven garbage, and amount of energy in a round is essentially meaningless. A punch from a strong man or a car wreck at 20 MPH put considerably more energy into your body than a shot from even a fast .45, and they are much more survivable events. Penetration to organs and tissue destruction are the only things that can destroy the CNS, and thus the only thing that matters. Proponents of energy in a round are focusing on the wrong aspect of terminal ballistics. The insinuation that choosing .380 means you're some kind of gullible sucker who doesn't understand math is pretty insulting, I understand it well, and understand dozens of cartridges very well. .380 is a compromise round. No one carrying it thinks it's service-grade, including me, but even the tiniest 9mms aren't quite as concealable as .380s, and the ultra-tiny nines like the Rohrbaugh are expensive and rare, unlike my $299 LCP which I shoot rather well and carry literally 100% of the time I leave my house. Choose the 9mm if you like it better in a small gun - it's undoubtedly a better round - but don't imply that having a different opinion makes you smarter. Last edited by LockedBreech; March 24, 2013 at 11:13 AM. |
|
March 24, 2013, 11:08 AM | #55 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
It's going as strong as all the other defensive handgun calibers out there: ammo is hard to come by. My reason for not getting one was that I could not see paying several dollars a box more for less performance than a gun in 9x19 ..... with no practical upside. |
|
March 24, 2013, 12:50 PM | #56 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2002
Location: northern CA for a little while longer
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
Stopping Power is a term best applied to discussion of disc brakes in motor vehicles. Anyway, I used to be one of those young guys who felt the only defensive calibers "worth carrying" were .357 Magnum, .44 Magnum & .45 ACP. (.44 Spl & .45 Colt were marginal "secondary choices", if only due to lack of bullet development.) Then, one day they took my issued .357 Magnum revolver away and handed me one of those lightweight, hi-cap Wonder Nines (one of the newly released S&W 3rd gen 9's), and I realized the days of being able to finally get around to buying that Buscadero leather rig to carry one of my .44's as an authorized duty weapon were suddenly gone. As my time passed in my LE career, and I spent increasingly more time working as a firearms instructor, my personal thoughts & opinions evolved a bit. The "caliber" issue took a back seat to what I decided were the more critical considerations of training, frequent practice, skillset, knowledge of tactics and Mindset. (I'd put Mindset first if I were listing them in order of priority, though.) As time continued to pass I found myself carrying 9's increasingly more often on my own time, although I eventually developed a collection of .40's and more .45's. Then, I "rediscovered" the practicality & value of the venerable 5-shot .38 snub ... and now I own more than half a dozen of them. Toward the end of my career (when I carried either a .40 or .45, since those were the only approved duty calibers), I found myself carrying one or another of my lightweight 5-shot snubs on my own time. I did (and do) a fair amount of practice/training with them, revisiting and refining my older DA revolver skills. The choice of buying a LCP came as a surprise, as for the last several years I'd pretty much decided the .38 Spl +P was the "lowest" I was willing to go for a working/defensive caliber. The tipping point for reconsidering the .380 was the diminutive size of the LCP (and the BG380, which is just enough larger that I went with the LCP). I could pocket holster the LCP in some instances when I couldn't do so with my 5-shot snubs (or, at least not as easily, depending). If I couldn't shoot the little LCP accurately, controllably and effectively ... I wouldn't own or carry it. If it hadn't demonstrated good reliability with a few of the more modern hollowpoints being offered in the caliber ... I wouldn't own or carry it. It's NOT a "replacement" for my .38/.357 snubs. It's an option for some situations and circumstances. (Neither are my .38/.357 snubs "replacements" for my assorted 9's, .40's & .45's. They allow options for my perceived needs.) There's a reason it's not uncommon to see .38/.380 calibers as the "smallest" calibers approved for secondary/backup & off-duty usage. (I remember when .22, .25 & .32 were once allowed at my former agency.) Last year I attended a couple of in-service training seminars devoted to LE who have been killed & assaulted, and officer safety/field tactics. Both the .38 snub and .380 pocket pistols were mentioned as having been effectively used to save the lives of cops. A surprising number of times. (The .38 snub was mentioned more often, but then it's arguably had a longer & stronger presence in LE work for its role. However, it's not unfair to speculate that the growing number of good quality, reduced size .380's will probably start to increase the presence of the caliber in this regard.)
__________________
Retired LE - firearms instructor & armorer |
|
March 24, 2013, 01:21 PM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2002
Location: northern CA for a little while longer
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
I've known any number of folks who looked at their choice of one or another of the major defensive/service center-fire handgun calibers as some sort of "security blanket", or, even worse, seemed to have chosen their caliber because of some sort of "talisman effect". Then, there's the handgun hunters, some of whom seem intent to virtually proselytize the use of "heavy-hitting, bone-breaking, deep-penetrating" large caliber SWC bullets for use in handguns carried for dedicated defensive use against human attackers (versus large, dangerous feral animals). It's a handgun. Everything about a handgun is a compromise, caliber included.
__________________
Retired LE - firearms instructor & armorer |
|
March 24, 2013, 03:25 PM | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
Is the 380 Still Going Strong?
Quote:
|
|
March 24, 2013, 06:34 PM | #59 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 2, 2013
Location: Heart of Texas
Posts: 788
|
Quote:
And speaking of the IWBA, it's best known member, Martin Fackler, convinced the FBI after the "Miami Shootout" that the solution was a subsonic 147 gr. JHP in 9mm, with many LE agencies following suit, with the result being little expansion and overpenetration to the point that innocent bystanders had been struck by bullets that had completely penetrated through their intended target. Fackler followed that up with the recommendation of the 10mm "Lite" that was also subsonic, penetrated deeply but with little expansion. It was deemed a failure. Then the .40 S&W came along and this time Fackler convinced the FBI to use a 165 gr. "Medium Velocity" load that performed as bad or worse than the 10mm "Lite". He still preaches penetration after shot placement with the same old subsonic theme except that we now have better technology bullets that will expand better at subsonic velocity. Then there's doc GKRoberts recommending things like the most effective load for defense with a .44 Magnum is a 300 gr. XTP that's designed for deep penetration in large game with controlled expansion. The third musketeer is Duncan MacPherson who states that 18" is the desired maximum penetration in gelatin and that might work, in GELATIN. I can provide a link if anyone wants to read the actual statement from Roberts where he also quotes MacPherson right here:http://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/Sel..._FAQ/index.htm The tests that the FBI uses today were actually copied from the Texas DPS when they selected their current service autos and cartridge. The DPS had a long and distinguished history using the .357 Magnum and in particular, the 125 gr. JHP since its inception. The DPS testing occurred before the wave of new bullet technology and bonded bullets. Only 2 cartridges passed all of the barrier tests with satisfactory penetration and expansion into ballistic gel. 1. the cartridge they adopted, the 125 gr. JHP in .357 SIG. 2. A 147 gr. JHP in 9mm rated +P+ that delivered around 1175 FPS from the SIG/Sauer P-226. The 9mm +P+ round was dropped from consideration only because of the possible bad press that might be associated with a +P+ label on their ammunition. No subsonic round passed the tests and neither the .40 S&W or the .45 ACP rounds they used passed the tests. The DPS has had very few issues in using either the 125 gr. JHP in .357 Magnum or the SIG. What do these rounds have in common that they deem so desirable? They both provide penetration even after barriers and still expanded reliably and provide a minimum of 500 Ft/Lbs of KE into their target. In the past 150 years, no one has had more gun fighting experience than the DPS/Texas Rangers with the recent exception of the US Border Patrol. In the findings of M&S's research, they concluded pretty much the same thing and their biggest detractor has been Martin Fackler who's never had a plausible explanation for the 125 gr. .357 Magnum's outstanding street record. There is far better research being conducted today than theories like bleed-out where you can be killed while waiting. This will also shed some light on Martin Fackler's feud with M&S if you have any basic concept of physics:http://www.btgresearch.org/wb.htm As far as the 9mm case only being 2mms longer than the .380's, it also develops 35,000 PSI for standard pressure ammo with a 38,500 PSI max. for the better 124 gr. +P loads. The max. pressure rating for the .380 is 21,500 PSI and none of the major ammo makers load anywhere close to it. For that you'll need boutique loads from companies like CorBon, Underwood, Double-Tap or Buffalo Bore with some of them wearing a +P label. |
|
March 24, 2013, 06:52 PM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
Is the 380 Still Going Strong?
57k, since you like the Texas DPS approach, and say that's the current FBI approach, would you agree with my statement that the current FBI protocol is a good objective measure? Better than anecdotes at least? That was my only point.
|
March 24, 2013, 07:29 PM | #61 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 2, 2013
Location: Heart of Texas
Posts: 788
|
Quote:
|
|
March 25, 2013, 08:55 AM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2011
Location: Ohio-Kentucky - florida
Posts: 1,221
|
Is the 380 Still Going Strong?
The 380 or so called 9mm shorts are going strong and expensive
Sent from iPhone |
March 25, 2013, 09:52 AM | #63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 2,018
|
Quote:
Fast forward 2 years and guess what... I carry the LCP nearly 100% of the time because it is noticeably more comfortable. I just dont worry so much about being attacked or in a gun fight enough to be uncomfortable all day every day. I sold the PM9 despite liking it very much. I do keep a G27 in the truck though... |
|
March 25, 2013, 06:51 PM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 853
|
I've carried a .22 magnum as well. The .380 is the .38 of the auto world. It's adequate, and with certain ammo, excellent. It's not a 9mm any more than a .38 is a .357. It works and has for many years. The pistols, among other things, have a certain "sex" appeal, for lack of a better term. They're the Miata of the gun world. Yeah other cars have more muscle and power, but for some, the form factor just does it. Someone who can drive a Miata will go around the track faster than a newbie with a ton of horsepower that uses that horsepower as a replacement for skill.
|
March 25, 2013, 09:04 PM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 19, 2001
Posts: 1,603
|
Did everyone see the raw video of the PA shooting that was caught on tape?:
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/...03/22/2007039/ The perp used what looked to be either a full-size .380 or compact 9mm judging by its size, and he hit three of the men inside the building. But as you can see they all got back up and ran out the door after him. I guess they probably didn't even realize they were shot at first. This is the sort of thing that might happen regardless of what you shoot an assailant with. He may go down right away, or he may not even realize you're shooting him. The victims in this case were obviously not struck in any vital areas, which is the key thing to understand here. Those who carry a .45 with the smug confidence that they're going to put the bad guy down with just one or two hits might be in for a shocker if they actually had to use it. My complaint about the small .380 pistols really has nothing to do with the caliber, it's more the fact that they're darn near impossible to hit anything with beyond arm's length. I hear of owners who say they're fired 400-500 rounds through their little pocket gun and trust it every day, when the fact is they likely haven't practiced with it enough to hit the center X of a target except slow fire at 10 feet. Try it again at 21 feet allowing less than .5 second between shots and see how you do. Almost any caliber will do the job if you can reliably reach the CNS of your adversary, but if you can't then caliber discussions are more a matter of pride than anything else. |
March 26, 2013, 04:11 AM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Posts: 340
|
To this day i never leave my house without my lcp. It is never my primary but its always there! Just like my wallet. I own and carry a few others as well, such as the bersa .380, Cz83 and The beretta 84/85 series. People rag on the .380 but i have never felt undergunned with it.
|
|
|