The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 5, 2015, 03:27 PM   #1
Ignition Override
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2008
Location: About 20 nm from the Big Muddy
Posts: 2,884
How would you describe the Makarov's recoil?

My memory of the Russian is not clear at all, although it seemed less harsh than friends' Polish P-64
(only chambered in 9x18). But how much better?
The recoil of my PPK in .380 is not bad: a fair bit better than the P-64, though stronger than the Sig 232.

Does anybody here have experience with both the actual Mak and one of these other types listed?
If I continue to have only one reliable type of ammo which avoids frequent FTFeed in the PPK, might consider an actual Russian/Bulg. Mak as a secondary carry gun.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old March 5, 2015, 03:32 PM   #2
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The PPK is a lighter gun but it is in .380, which is a less powerful round than the 9x18 Makarov, so its recoil is less. I would describe the recoil of the Makarov (and other pistols of the same weight in the same caliber) as "sharp".

None of the guns in that general class have enough recoil to be bothersome or to prevent good control for subsequent shots.

FWIW, the PP and PPK Walthers were designed around the .32 ACP; in .380. they are sensitive to bullet design. I recommend that you stick to round-nose FMJ; if you want to try other bullets, make sure the gun will fire at least 200 rounds with no problems before using them for carry.

Jim

Last edited by James K; March 5, 2015 at 03:38 PM.
James K is offline  
Old March 5, 2015, 03:47 PM   #3
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
I have both a Makarov and a P-64. Recoil with the Mak is negligible to me (but then again, I also shoot a .44 mag). Recoil with the P-64 is a little more noticible mainly because of the lighter weight and smaller grip surface area.
Doyle is offline  
Old March 5, 2015, 04:28 PM   #4
GyMac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 189
I have 3 Maks in 9mm Mak and a Russian Commercial in .380. The recoil of the 9mm Maks is noticeably "sharper" than the .380, but not uncomfortable. The 9mm Makarov's "kick" is greater than the PPK in .380.
GyMac is offline  
Old March 5, 2015, 04:28 PM   #5
lee n. field
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 12, 2002
Location: The same state as Mordor.
Posts: 5,568
Quote:
How would you describe the Makarov's recoil?
"Noticeable"
__________________
"As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven. "
lee n. field is offline  
Old March 5, 2015, 04:30 PM   #6
WVsig
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 30, 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 5,309
They are snappy due to its blowback design. Similar to guns like the CZ82, Beretta 81 series guns, Walthers PPK etc...

There is more felt recoil than a breech locked 9mm Para even thought the 9mm Para is a more powerful round.

It will be similar to the guns you already have. Others seem to think it is snappier than 380 but I do not find it much different.
__________________
-The right to be left alone is the most comprehensive of rights, and the right most valued by free people.-Louis Brandeis
-Its a tool box... I don't care you put the tools in for the job that's all... -Sam from Ronin
-It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle
WVsig is offline  
Old March 5, 2015, 04:40 PM   #7
Metalboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2014
Location: SE. Wisconsin.
Posts: 327
Mine is only similar, CZ 82, and it's name is Lady's gun.
__________________
Hungarian by birth, American by choice.
I don't collect guns.They just accumulate themselves.
Metalboy is offline  
Old March 5, 2015, 07:46 PM   #8
MarkGlazer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2013
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 329
I agree with WVSig. However, if you re-load, you can control the recoil. The Mak is a great gun, easy to care for and very accurate.

Have fun. Be safe.

Good luck.
__________________
non ministrari sed ministrare
MarkGlazer is offline  
Old March 5, 2015, 07:47 PM   #9
GyMac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 189
I would add that, when attempting to duplicate 9mm Makarov recoil with .380 loads in my Russian Commercial, I reach max before getting near the recoil of factory 9mm Mak. The .380 (from a Mak) seems very tame in comparison.
GyMac is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 12:13 AM   #10
michael t
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Location: Out back Ky
Posts: 4,044
Their not really all that much difference in the 2 calibers . So recoil about the same. Use a Corbon or Buffalo Bore and their pretty equal. Commies always want to be just a little different than every one else.
__________________
Certified Armed Infidel Colt Defender ,Colt Mustang ,Dan Wesson CBOB, PPK/S, American Classic 1911,Bersa Thunder 380
http://bersachat.comHome of Bersa
http://www.metroarms1911forum.com
michael t is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 10:39 AM   #11
Willie D
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Posts: 1,149
I feel like the shape of the blackstrap, along with the added weight of the slide makes my Makarov a bit more pleasurable to shoot than my wife's PPK.

Although the PPK is lighter to carry, has better sights, and has a less obtrusive safety lever.
Willie D is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 11:17 AM   #12
Onward Allusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 3,133
I've had the real Mak, the civilian hi cap version, & the CZ82. All are fairly mild as far as blowbacks 9x18 or 380's are concerned. The CZ82 is actually on the light side to me. I never owned the PPK but I can imagine the recoil would be about the same based on the slightly softer caliber and lighter weight of the PPK. The P-64 would probably be pretty snappy due to the size of the pistol.
__________________
Simple as ABC . . . Always Be Carrying
Onward Allusion is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 11:35 AM   #13
tallball
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2014
Posts: 2,444
I have a Russian commercial model in 380. It is somewhat snappy, but not too bad.
tallball is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 11:58 AM   #14
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,379
I really don't notice the recoil of my East German Mak at all.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 12:27 PM   #15
Model12Win
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
Not too bad, it's a Soviet .380 +P+, not bad, but could be better.
Model12Win is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 04:24 PM   #16
Limnophile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2015
Location: Issaquah, Washington
Posts: 1,032
I have a CZ 82 and a CZ 83 chambered in .380 Auto. I can't discern a difference in recoil between the two. Using Federal American Eagle ammo, the 9 Makarov has a muzzle momentum only 2% greater than the .380 Auto. The two pistols are essentially identical, so it's not surprising that recoil is similar.
Limnophile is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 10:00 PM   #17
Kosmo K
Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2014
Posts: 64
Snappy
Kosmo K is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 10:29 PM   #18
Metalboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 2014
Location: SE. Wisconsin.
Posts: 327
Snappy, or whippersnapper. Looking good, or good looking......
__________________
Hungarian by birth, American by choice.
I don't collect guns.They just accumulate themselves.
Metalboy is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 10:49 PM   #19
qwiksdraw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 23, 2012
Posts: 534
Fun!
__________________
Quote:
"I Miss America."
qwiksdraw is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 11:16 PM   #20
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Quote:
How would you describe the Makarov's recoil?
Orange, with hints of cinnamon.

OK, OK, I'll be serious. I feel more recoil, but the character of it is more pleasant than the PPK. I'd describe both as being snappy, but the backstrap and grip shape of the PPK get unpleasant after a few rounds.

My biggest problem with the Makarov is remembering to hold my weak thumb over strong. If my strong thumb rides up, that safety lever will tear into my first knuckle something terrible.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old March 6, 2015, 11:43 PM   #21
TunnelRat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,204
On my CZ 82 it feels like a sharp jolt to the web of my hand. It's very noticeable, but not at all painful and I can shoot 100 rds in a sitting without it bothering me. Blowbacks are what they are, however.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon
Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges
Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture
Maintain situational awareness
TunnelRat is offline  
Old March 7, 2015, 06:48 AM   #22
Ibmikey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Location: Now relocated to Texas
Posts: 2,943
Of the many 9x18 pistols that I have, Mak's, P64's , PA 63, CZ 82's etc. the only ones with objectionable recoil are the P64's-- they just make this old hand wince in pain after a mag or so. I like the cartridge and in my opinion of East Block firearms the CZ 82 is the best designed and reliable of all. A bit big for CC but a heck of a shooter.
Ibmikey is offline  
Old March 7, 2015, 09:21 AM   #23
Deaf Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
Due to the horrific DA triggers on the PP/PPK and P64 pistols I'd pick the Mak, especially the East German made one's, any day if the week.

Yes the PPK is more finicky in .380 (I've owned several over the years) and the Mak does kick a bit more. But the fmj 9x18 is more blunt than the .380 fmj and a bit faster. JHPs are made for the Mak to, just not as many as the .380.

So if the PPK gives you any more problems, hunt down a EG Makarov. I have one and it is excellent.

Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides
Deaf Smith is offline  
Old March 7, 2015, 12:28 PM   #24
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
Quote:
Due to the horrific DA triggers on the PP/PPK and P64 pistols I'd pick the Mak,
DA trigger on the P-64 is only bad with the factory main spring. A 2-minute $5 spring replacement makes it as smooth as any DA gun I've ever shot.
Doyle is offline  
Old March 7, 2015, 05:17 PM   #25
steves2
Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2013
Location: Tennessee.
Posts: 18
I have an East German Makarov, and several Walther PPK/Ss. I haven't shot them side by side, but the recoil is similar, and not unpleasant. My Polish P-64s however feel like they are going to split my thumb from the rest of my hand!
__________________
What kind of country are we becoming?
The 'truth' has become lies that others keep repeating.
steves2 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11566 seconds with 8 queries