Krink on Full Auto

GRAND MASTER WANNABE · September 13, 2012, 10:26 AM

Hey guys, looking to get a select fire Krink as a PDW. A Buddy of mine told me that the krinks were nearly uncontrollable on full auto. I have never shot one, and definately do not want my PDW to be uncontrolable, cause then what is the point? Is it true? looking for full auto use on targets from 0 to 25 yards.

mboylan · September 13, 2012, 03:30 PM

You are going to pay $17,000 plus for a legal Krink. If you ever did use it in self defense, the legal battles would wipe you out. It would sit for years in police custody as evidence.

It also takes hundreds of rounds to become proficient with full-auto, especially for something with as much recoil as the 7.62x39.

David Hineline · September 13, 2012, 10:50 PM

Short rifles recoil less because the bullet is in the barrel for shorter time building up backpressure.

The blast from a Krink is severe and blinding at night, it will not push on your shoulder as hard as a full AK style rifle. http://myweb.cableone.net/uziforme/twoglocks.wmv

GRAND MASTER WANNABE · September 15, 2012, 06:50 PM

I apologize, I was reffereing to a 5.45x39.

Madcap_Magician · September 18, 2012, 11:33 AM

If he can afford to A. buy and B. shoot a legal SBR full-auto Krinkov, paying legal fees in the extremely rare chance that he ever needs to use it in self defense would probably not be a big deal, methinks.

mboylan · September 18, 2012, 03:01 PM

You are wrong about the legal fees. An AC-556 was used in self defense several years ago. The legal fees were in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

September 13, 2012, 10:26 AM	#1
GRAND MASTER WANNABE Member Join Date: January 4, 2012 Posts: 36	Krink on Full Auto Hey guys, looking to get a select fire Krink as a PDW. A Buddy of mine told me that the krinks were nearly uncontrollable on full auto. I have never shot one, and definately do not want my PDW to be uncontrolable, cause then what is the point? Is it true? looking for full auto use on targets from 0 to 25 yards.

September 13, 2012, 03:30 PM	#2
mboylan Senior Member Join Date: March 31, 2011 Posts: 120	You are going to pay $17,000 plus for a legal Krink. If you ever did use it in self defense, the legal battles would wipe you out. It would sit for years in police custody as evidence. It also takes hundreds of rounds to become proficient with full-auto, especially for something with as much recoil as the 7.62x39. Last edited by mboylan; September 13, 2012 at 03:41 PM.

September 13, 2012, 10:50 PM	#3
David Hineline Senior Member Join Date: December 23, 1999 Location: South Sioux City, Nebraska Posts: 704	Short rifles recoil less because the bullet is in the barrel for shorter time building up backpressure. The blast from a Krink is severe and blinding at night, it will not push on your shoulder as hard as a full AK style rifle. http://myweb.cableone.net/uziforme/twoglocks.wmv

September 15, 2012, 06:50 PM	#4
GRAND MASTER WANNABE Member Join Date: January 4, 2012 Posts: 36	I apologize, I was reffereing to a 5.45x39.

September 18, 2012, 11:33 AM	#5
Madcap_Magician Senior Member Join Date: August 13, 2009 Location: MN Posts: 668	If he can afford to A. buy and B. shoot a legal SBR full-auto Krinkov, paying legal fees in the extremely rare chance that he ever needs to use it in self defense would probably not be a big deal, methinks.

September 18, 2012, 03:01 PM	#6
mboylan Senior Member Join Date: March 31, 2011 Posts: 120	You are wrong about the legal fees. An AC-556 was used in self defense several years ago. The legal fees were in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.