|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 20, 2009, 06:58 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
Why Chamber empty carry is such a bad idea
Yes I know it's the 'Israeli' method, but there are serious reasons not to:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=086_1260862712 1. As in the tape, if you short stroke the weapon, ops..... I understand the jeweler in the tape died, yes the one with the gun that didn't fire cause it looks like he failed to rack it fully. 2. Chamber empty requires two hands, especially if you have to do it fast. Failure to have that second hand free gives you a rather poor club for a gun. 3. If you choose to rack the slide one handed on the calf of your leg, you run the same short stroke risk as well as any 'melted' sights not snagging enough to even rack it (try it with a weapon like a Kel-Tec P3AT or LCP or Browning 1910, or... well any slick slide weapon or Novak sighted weapon. 4. The ONLY reasons I can even think of having a chamber empty weapon are those what are not drop safe (older Colt 1903, Browning 1910, striker fired Ravesn, Jenneings, etc... including Star BMs with longer fireing pins than the length of travel, or those with very poor safeties that are very slow to use. So with modern drop safe pistols, chamber empty does not make the weapon any 'safer'. As long as your weapon is drop safe, I strongly suggest you carry it fully loaded. Or carry a revolver!
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
December 20, 2009, 07:31 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2004
Posts: 3,150
|
Israel is basically not a pro gun society, but they carry guns for reasons that don't have to be enumerated. They're a bit paranoid of loaded pistols, however.
One can learn to draw and rack a pistol with practice. But as we saw, things can go wrong. Don't know how much he practiced, but obviously something went wrong. He was behind the curve facing long odds from the start, but brought his gun to bear after taking a bullet. Don't know if that first bullet was fatal or not. Looked like he had time to put some bullets in his assailants---if his gun had worked. A few years back, on a similar video, a jewelry store owner was able to draw his pistol from his back pocket as he saw Bubba turn to draw his. The owner was quicker. Too bad he was too unfamiliar with his pistol to disengage the safety---Colt Mustang, if I recall. He was then taken in the back room and shot. I think he survived and blamed the gun maker. |
December 20, 2009, 08:22 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 575
|
There is a method to rack and load as you pull the gun from your holster. However, I don't do it... mine is chambered and ready, because too many bad things can happen, and quickly.
|
December 20, 2009, 08:27 PM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Posts: 863
|
My CC is ready to rock 'n' roll by simply pulling the trigger which instantly disengages the trigger safety.
|
December 20, 2009, 09:48 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2009
Posts: 517
|
Keep one in the pipe (All the time).
|
December 20, 2009, 09:54 PM | #6 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
When armed with the M1911A1, Military Police were required to keep the chamber empty, hammer down, and the magazine loaded. They were taught to load the pistol by pressing the muzzle against the edge of the holster. I don't know if they do the same with the M9 or not, or if they can carry the new pistol with the chamber loaded.
Jim |
December 20, 2009, 10:18 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Posts: 259
|
I wonder how many people train in stress situations with an empty chamber? If you carry that way, have you tried it out under stress?
|
December 20, 2009, 10:45 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2009
Posts: 367
|
Condition 1, the only way to go.
|
December 20, 2009, 11:10 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: December 17, 2009
Location: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
Posts: 27
|
I stumbled into this site less than a week ago. Very informative. This thread is a perfect example of something i would not have even thought about but makes perfect sense when explained properly.
|
December 21, 2009, 05:14 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
And remember to be polite to the BG and say 'excuse me but give me a moment to load my gun '
|
December 21, 2009, 06:54 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
|
So how many think you can outdraw the bad guy, assuming of course that no bad guys ever read this forum?
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands! Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag, and return us to our own beloved homes! Buy War Bonds. |
December 21, 2009, 07:30 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2009
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 1,902
|
Stress has a way of locking all brain functions. Most anything that occurs during a high stress situation is usually a result of rote memory (no thinking involved) whereby the training kicks in. If one carries an empty chamber gun, he must continually train and practice draw and racking the slide. There are too many variables for this to have a consistently good outcome, especially under high stress. If one is going to carry a gun, always carry it in Condition 1. And as a previous post suggests, if you are not carrying Condition 1, carry a revolver.
__________________
45Gunner May the Schwartz Be With You. NRA Instructor NRA Life Member |
December 21, 2009, 07:31 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,934
|
Watch the Videos of inmates practice disarming techniques in prisons, then you will not be to happy with empty chamber carry. You need all the advantage you can get, no wasted time.
You were bored Deaf? |
December 21, 2009, 09:06 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
|
The thing that blows my mind every time one of these 'chamber empty or not for ccw' threads comes up is that there is even a discussion about it. Why anyone in their right mind would intentionally opt make themselves even LESS likely to prevail in a life and death struggle is beyond my ability to comprehend. If carrying a loaded gun makes a person uncomfortable then put it away and go buy some pepper spray, and if the design of the weapon is such that empty chamber carry is the only safe way, then save your pennies and go buy a decent weapon. Crikey.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer |
December 21, 2009, 09:18 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
|
Crikey, you say. How long would I need to save pennies. I'm not that young. A decent handgun goes for over $500, some, I'm told, even more. And then there is the crowd that believes no one makes a decent gun and they all need something more. Sorry, can't go there.
However, the basis of all this discussion is the assumption that all situations will involve a fast draw against, presumably, someone else also making a quick draw, or so it seems. Now you tell me you can make a really fast draw from concealment and I'll stop making comments.
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands! Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag, and return us to our own beloved homes! Buy War Bonds. |
December 21, 2009, 09:20 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,721
|
Quote:
I work armed security...two of my co-workers carry chamber empty and another one's even worse off cause sometimes he has one in the chamber, sometimes he doesn't. If you ask him if he's got one in the chamber that day, he couldn't tell you off-hand and he'd have to check. I just don't understand some people's way of thinking....at least keep it consistent. |
|
December 21, 2009, 11:01 AM | #17 | ||
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
December 21, 2009, 11:34 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2009
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
__________________
"Either you are the weapon and your gun is a tool, or your gun is the weapon and you are a tool." Matt K. |
|
December 21, 2009, 11:36 AM | #19 | |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
If you can't know for sure that you will have time and both hands available, it just doesn't seem very wise to count on having the time and both hands available. Too much can be at stake. |
|
December 21, 2009, 12:41 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
|
I'm not part of the in crowd. What does DGU mean?
The tenor of the previous few posts leads one to wonder whatever happened to situational awareness that some here speak of and seem to think so important. Again, I've mentioned in a different thread that other assumptions are overstressing the difficulty of chambering a round (under stress) versus the ease of flicking off a safety (under stress) for automatics so equipped. In my own experiences a smooth draw is more important than an attempted fast draw (easy to say, though) but doing so from concealment, especially in this season, becomes problematic, though not an impossibility. Practice helps whether or not it makes perfect. There are many variables in all of this, mostly in the way any given handgun happens to work. I only have a few handguns myself, but only two automatics. Though they are both "traditional double actions," they still work differently. Observe that in spite of my arguments above (or perhaps because of it), the 9mm that I have has no safety, just a hammer drop. Oddly enough, it also happens to be the easier of the two to quickly chamber a round, mainly because it is the larger of the two. But I am also fond of my old S&W Model 13 revolver, too, which is more of a woods gun. I've tried just about every variation of action over the years but kept on trading because there's still more things to learn about guns, even though I read that Jeff Cooper said you only need one personal gun (Elmer Keith sure never said that). Naturally the action is not the only thing to like or dislike about a handgun and by no means would it necessarily be the factor that makes you take one and leave the other behind (Did you ever have to make up your mind?). I have gravitated over the years to double action automatics, though I still find myself with a single action now and then but my ownership of them becomes shorter and shorter. I have also tended to pick lighter guns, though not necessarily smaller ones. If I were to do it all over again (Ah, to be 60 again!), well, no doubt I do it all over again. At the moment, if I could, I think I'd spend the money on a Kahr. I've fired one and it was a toss up with a Glock but the Kahr is, I think, a true double action. Mox nix. I have no money.
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands! Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag, and return us to our own beloved homes! Buy War Bonds. |
December 21, 2009, 01:34 PM | #21 | ||||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Disengaging the safety, at least on many guns suitable for defensive use, is a far simpler act. Certainly disengaging the safety on one of my 1911s is an easy and natural motion. Quote:
|
||||
December 21, 2009, 02:03 PM | #22 | ||
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
Quote:
In my opinion, it is far easier to do so if one does not have to chamber a round. |
||
December 21, 2009, 02:25 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
|
I conclude we have different opinions about things. But I suspect we have different experiences and different abilities. Different abilities is one of those things that are rarely mentioned and not so easy to talk about. I would still say that your situational awareness will become an overriding aspect of the situation. One and a half seconds is pretty good (provided you can hit the target, too). Does that include reaction time?
No, I still don't think that chamber empty carry is so bad, which is not the same as saying that other alternatives aren't good, maybe better. True, it takes a lot of practice but so does everything else and some pistols, like I keep saying, lend themselves to that more than others. Does anyone here, by the way, use a S&W/Walther type safety (with the upward movement)?
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands! Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag, and return us to our own beloved homes! Buy War Bonds. |
December 21, 2009, 02:27 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: Orygun USA
Posts: 184
|
It wouldn't matter how much training I had. I would never carry w/o one in the pipe. I carry a sub-compact DA only 9mm. No safety or anything to worry about. It's point and shoot, baby!
|
December 21, 2009, 03:05 PM | #25 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
You then go for your gun, draw, and fire. It's not an absolute--just the result of a study performed some time ago. The purpose was to establish the danger radius based on an assumed capability of a 1.5 second draw and fire time. The answer was 21 ft.--also not an absolute. The point is, unlike the soldier in the field or a law enforcement officer on duty, the civilian carrying concealed may not draw just because he senses potential danger. He may draw only when it is immediately necessary--and in most jurisdictions, when deadly force is immediately necessary. The old A, O, J triad comes into play. Situational awareness can help you stay out of trouble, but it does not permit you to draw sooner. Regardless of the "exact" distance (actually, there isn't such a thing), which will depend on circumstance, the time allowed is very short indeed. If the guy can move more quickly than average, you'll have less time. You do not want to choose any weapon or method of carry that will not give you a high probability of success. The stakes are just too high. DA revolvers and DAO or striker fired semi-autos with rounds chambered can meet that requirement with a practiced shooter, with the right holster and clothing, provided that nothing snags. So can a 1911, cocked and locked. Add the step of cambering a round under duress and it becomes more questionable, notwithstanding the bravado and claims of some shooters. Personally, I cannot think of any good reason to chance it. If you are sooting at center mass at someone who has closed to a distance of five feet, accuracy will not be an issue. However, that may not describe the encounter. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|