|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 12, 2007, 05:41 AM | #76 |
Junior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2007
Posts: 1
|
I would not rely on the mercy of an armed felon. Compliance and a close call...
http://news.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ar...0333/1321/NEWS Burglar killed; homeowner hurt Frank X. Mullen ([email protected]) RENO GAZETTE-JOURNAL September 11, 2007 A Reno man was wounded as he disarmed a burglar in his home and fatally shot the intruder Monday afternoon, police said. Reno police Sgt. Ray Leal said a resident in the 400 block of Brittany Avenue was confronted by the gunman when he arrived at home about 1:35 p.m. The burglar, a 43-year-old Reno man whose name was withheld, ordered the resident to crawl to the bathroom at the end of the hall and remain there while he resumed the burglary. After a short time, the burglar placed a gun to the resident's head. The man told police he believed he was about to be shot and turned his head as the gun discharged. He then jumped to his feet and struggled with the suspect for the gun, sustaining two gunshots to his upper body, but managed to wrestle the gun from the intruder and shoot him. The resident was treated at Renown Regional Medical Center for non-life-threatening injuries. "I don't believe the two men knew each other," Leal said at the scene. Detectives can be reached at 334-2115 or Secret Witness at 322-4900. |
September 12, 2007, 09:24 AM | #77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Again, this thread is going nowhere. Same old blather based on a refusal to understand the basic issue in favor of heroic posturing.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
September 12, 2007, 09:59 AM | #78 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 5, 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 406
|
Maybe we like blather! Ever think of that? Huh?! HUH!?
__________________
Greg Miller "Remember, a valid point never overrules a family tradition." - Me |
September 12, 2007, 10:45 AM | #79 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
Quote:
I think it bothered me mostly because it sure seems to me that in some situations, control actually is more important than life itself. For instance, if there is no doubt at all that you are going to get killed in the end, would you rather
Given those two options, and only those two, which one would you choose? (I'd take card #1 myself; in such a simple case, being able to control the manner of my death would be more important to me than living.) Of course, life isn't so simple. The BTK killer, for instance, never told people that the above was the choice they were making when they decided whether or not to cooperate with him. Instead, he told them that if they cooperated, they wouldn't get killed. Or that, if they cooperated, he would let their loved ones go. His victims usually believed they had a choice between
Given a choice between those two options, anyone in their right mind would cooperate. But guess what? Psychopaths lie. That's what they do. They are generally really good at lying. The actual choice the BTK killer was offering was a bit more bleak. His victims actually had a choice between
Cooperating and surviving was not among the cards BTK put in play. So the question becomes, how do you know whether you are making a deal with an ordinary, decent criminal or whether you are talking to a twisted, violent psychopath with a sadistic streak? Answer: you don't. Psychopaths are good at lying. Remember that. There are no guarantees. If you know the odds, you have a slight advantage when you choose your course of action -- simply because you are more likely to know what realistic possibilities are actually among the cards in play. For example, if the assailant wants to shove you into his car and take you to the place experts call "Crime Scene #2", you can take it pretty well as a given that you are going to die anyway so you might as well fight back right here and now. No matter how bad your immediate odds appear to be, they aren't going to get any better once he gets you inside his vehicle and away from potential witnesses. Offered the choice between getting in the car or not getting in the car, your actual choice is between getting shot right there with potential witnesses around, or dying a slow death by torture in the woods somewhere. Knowing the odds of survival if you cooperate also lets you know which cards are in play. As Glenn pointed out, bank robberies traditionally create a fairly low risk of bystanders getting killed. Normally, bank robbers just want to grab and go. So you can probably gamble on cooperation in such a circumstance ... unless the criminal(s) begin tying people up, or shepherding them one by one into a back room, or ratcheting up the violence in some other way. The odds change as soon as the criminals begin putting cards on the table. However. Keep in mind that in cooperating, you are rarely facing the simple possibilities of
It isn't quite that simple. Instead, you are actually gambling between
Put each of those outcomes on a set of cards and shuffle the deck randomly. Pick a card ... Which outcome happens once you cooperate is utterly outside of your control. But if you decide to fight back, you can significantly improve your odds of a good outcome by getting training in both shooting skills and defensive tactics. If you absolutely must fight back, fighting back skillfully creates far better odds than fighting back clumsily. Get training. Be realistic about your skill level. And be smart enough to know which cards are actually in play and which cards are simply not available. pax Last edited by pax; September 12, 2007 at 01:24 PM. Reason: for clarity |
|
September 12, 2007, 11:18 AM | #80 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
Amen Pax!!!
I would only add that for me: I know what I will and can do. I cannot know what the BG can and will do. Therefore I will do what I can based on the situation. No matter what the outcome, I will know that I made the choice and that I decided whether to take a stand or not. I refuse to let someone make that choice for me. If that means control is more important than life, so be it. Glenn, some of us have BTDT and it has nothing to do with posturing. |
September 12, 2007, 11:40 AM | #81 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
|
Heroic posturing? Failure to understand the issue? Glenn we understand the issue buddy. It isn't rocket science to understand what odds and probabilities are. We are willing to accept the statistical increase in danger. You may not be and thats your business. It isn't heroic posturing its a "going down fighting" mentality. Just don't come on here making it look like those who disagree with you are issue dumb.
|
September 12, 2007, 01:02 PM | #82 | |||||
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
September 12, 2007, 02:11 PM | #83 | |||||
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
September 12, 2007, 02:14 PM | #84 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
September 12, 2007, 02:20 PM | #85 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
It's really hard for people to face reality. Many people endow guns with mythical powers and then have a hard time when faced with the fact that they are just tools, and as tools the most important factor is who is using that tool.
A gun does not grant omnipotence and there are situations where use of a gun will cause more harm than good. In fact, and the statistics bear this out, there are more situations where using a gun will make the situation worse than there are situations where gun use will make the situation better. If you know and utilise this information you will have better outcomes, if you ignore this data and think your gun has mystical powers and is the right answer to every question you will have worse outcomes. Furthermore I think the "death before dishonor" crowd are mentally ill and need help. It can be argued that pain and torture leading up to death is worse than death, but loss of honor being worse than death is just warped, not least of all because honor is impossible to define, with any definition relying greatly on circumstances and culture. |
September 12, 2007, 02:22 PM | #86 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
September 12, 2007, 02:23 PM | #87 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 8, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,769
|
Quote:
Very eloquently stated. |
|
September 12, 2007, 03:14 PM | #88 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
|
Quote:
|
|
September 12, 2007, 05:32 PM | #89 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
September 12, 2007, 06:35 PM | #90 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
I just happened to run across this this very afternoon:
Based on nationally representative samples of crime incidents reported in the National Crime Victimization Surveys, victims who use guns for self-protection were less likely to be injured or to lose property than otherwise similar victims who used other forms of self-protection or who did not resist at all. For example, among robbery victims who used guns, only 17% were injured and only 31% lost property, compared to 25% inury rates and 88% property loss rates among victims who did not resist at all, and 33% injury rates and 65% property loss rates among all robbery victims. Excerpted from Gun and Self Defense By Gary Kleck Ph.D |
September 12, 2007, 08:27 PM | #91 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
Yes Lurper, those stats support the theory that there are indeed situations where a gun is a valuable self defense tool. My point is that sometimes it makes sense to use a gun and sometimes it makes sense to keep it in your pocket, that should not be a controversial statement. The tricky bit is knowing when to draw your weapon and when to leave it in your pocket, or for those who don't own a seecamp or keltec yet in your holster.
The most valuable self defense tool you have is between your ears,. use that first. That's all I'm really saying |
September 12, 2007, 09:13 PM | #92 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2007
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
__________________
If guns were outlawed, then only outlaws would have guns. |
|
September 12, 2007, 09:19 PM | #93 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2007
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
__________________
If guns were outlawed, then only outlaws would have guns. |
|
September 13, 2007, 05:10 AM | #94 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
|
Quote:
|
|
September 13, 2007, 06:20 AM | #95 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
When you let the situation evolve and decide what to do based on the details, you are letting the odds, as you know them from past experiences, inform your decision making and ultimately your actions.
The problem is that you might take anecdotal evidence from gun sites like this and apply that instead of applying reality. A person who spends very much time on here could get a wild west or combat zone mentality that is actually very dangerous to have in the real world, since it is based on the paranoid comments of a few people rather than collected facts from the real world. And make no mistake, the same "control issues" that propel us to spend time getting a CCW permit and concern ourselves with handgun purchases come into play. All I'm saying is to be aware that we have those control issues and don't let them lure us into making foolish decisions. On a side note, "control issues" really do affect people's lives. Upper middle class white women are perhaps most affected, the theory being that they are used to being in control. In the study of assisted suicide I did upper middle class white women are the group most likely to take end of life matters into their own hands. They are used to being in charge and would rather end their lives on their own terms than wait for health concerns to follow their own course. I think this is the same mentality that would perhaps cause a CCW gun owner to take his chances in a firefight when perhaps it would be wiser to let things unfold on their own. |
September 13, 2007, 10:59 AM | #96 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
|
Justme, For me it is a "I just don't know for sure" thing.
Try this scenario. You are in a room with 3 exit doors. One is locked. Of the other two doors a single bad guy awaits on the other side of one door to shoot it out with you. You can get a key for the locked exit door by pulling the trigger on a 6 shot revolver loaded with one round (Russian Roulette style) while the muzzle is point at your stomach. You can also choose to exit one of the other 2 exit doors. What do you do and why? |
September 13, 2007, 01:37 PM | #97 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
Quote:
Quote:
Calling this a "wild west or combat zone metality" is way over the top. By the same token, you could say those who choose to stand their ground in their home rather than retreat (especially a woman) possess the same mentality. Which is pure hogwash of course. As far as the real world goes, some of us do this for a living and have BTDT and while our opinions may differ, those opinions are based on something other than what I hear other people say or read on a forum without checking it out. So to imply that those comments are paranoid ramblings not based on fact is a bit inaccurate and insulting. |
||
September 13, 2007, 01:39 PM | #98 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
Quote:
|
|
September 13, 2007, 02:20 PM | #99 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
You should never ever draw your gun until you believe that the situation calls for lethal force. Some people disagree with this attitude, I think they are wrong. If I draw a weapon I will shoot, if I shoot I will shoot to stop the threat( as opposed to shooting to kill, in a legal sense the killing is accidental and collateral to the act of stopping the threat).
If you draw a weapon with some misguided mindset that the mere presence of a gun will make all your dreams come true...well I think you are wrong. |
September 13, 2007, 03:08 PM | #100 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
Quote:
How about the idea that it is smarter to have the gun in your hand when you need it as opposed to having to draw first. You know, like Dennis Tueller demonstrated with his exercise? |
|
|
|