|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 14, 2002, 03:05 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2001
Posts: 2,132
|
Would you trade your M1 Super 90 for an M4 Super 90?
If you could only have one...well...would ya...punk?
Pro's: Pic rail More reliable (supposedly) with more weightgaining goodies on board (optics, taclight, sidesaddle) Cons: Lose 1 round No dedicated foreend light (yet?)
__________________
P7M8, VP9 |
November 14, 2002, 03:38 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2001
Location: northern va
Posts: 147
|
i really dont think i would trade the M1S90, actually i dont think i would even buy a M4S90
__________________
HK USPc .40 HK USPf .45 HK USPc .45 HK USPss .45 Match (clone) HK USP .45 Tactical HK Mark 23 DS Arms STG58A Carbine |
November 14, 2002, 04:05 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 16, 2000
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,456
|
I have a M3 S90 and it has never malfunctioned with slugs, buckshot or field loads. I can't imagine the M4 being more reliable than that (not possible) so - NO - no trade here!
__________________
RSVN '69-'71 PCSD Ret |
November 14, 2002, 04:27 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2001
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
__________________
P7M8, VP9 |
|
November 14, 2002, 05:48 PM | #5 |
Registration in progress
Join Date: December 26, 2001
Location: sunshine Fl
Posts: 122
|
Same here, the M1S90 is all that I need. Paying 1K+ for another semi-auto that gas operated is not on my list.
fwiw:I'll buy the M3 before the M4. |
November 14, 2002, 06:23 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 21, 2000
Posts: 823
|
Nah, my M1S90 works fine with a Surefire as-is. Never a misfeed, even with birdshot and low recoil buck/slugs.
Justin
__________________
Justin T. Huang late of Kennett Square, Pennsylvania |
November 14, 2002, 07:01 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2002
Posts: 111
|
Nope. The M1S90 is the best shotgun in the world.
|
November 14, 2002, 07:10 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2000
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 5,521
|
Negatron. The M1S90 is a near-perfect semi-auto shotgun, the M4S90 has some major flaws.
__________________
"The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." --A.E. Van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher the munchkin wrangler. |
November 14, 2002, 07:40 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 13, 1999
Location: Kern County, CA
Posts: 215
|
Nope.
|
November 14, 2002, 07:52 PM | #10 |
Staff Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2001
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,422
|
Having been involved in the testing of the M4 when S.W.A.T. had one in-house for an article, I'd have to say NO.
__________________
S.W.A.T. Magazine Weapons, Training and Tactics for the Real World Join us at TFL or at AR15.com or on Facebook |
November 14, 2002, 08:56 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 1998
Location: NE OH, USA
Posts: 3,198
|
No. I would just go get an M4 to add to the collection.
__________________
- Ron V. |
November 14, 2002, 10:18 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: February 2, 2001
Posts: 65
|
No way.
|
November 18, 2002, 09:49 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2000
Posts: 283
|
I have to agree. I'll keep my M1S90.
Don't see any need for the M4. It's a step in the wrong direction. |
November 19, 2002, 04:05 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2001
Location: North Babylon, N.Y.
Posts: 157
|
I really can't imagine the M4 being better than my M1S90 as I consider the M1 perfect to begin with.
__________________
Robby |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|