|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 25, 2015, 03:42 PM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2000
Location: England
Posts: 455
|
New Navy M1895, one of the last contract. Altered to shoot .38/200 by the British in 1940.
|
November 25, 2015, 05:54 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Posts: 2,033
|
Howdy
I just picked up this New Service on Sunday. Have not shot it yet. 44-40, made in 1907. |
November 25, 2015, 07:58 PM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
|
Quote:
I still don't have an OLD Colt revolver. And since my last post, I just parted ways with the one Colt revolver I did have. I'm not especially proud to admit that I rode a snippet of the snake gun wave and took in a nice sum for the early 90's Colt King Cobra that I had. The revolver was truly stunning to look at, IMO, I think it's better looking than -ANY- Python and I'm not trying to be a contrarian, it's just how I feel. But the double action was ridiculous and the value of the revolver far, FAR outweighed my desire to keep it.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
|
November 25, 2015, 08:52 PM | #54 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
Quote:
__________________
As always, YMMV. __________________________________________ MIIAA SIFE |
|
November 25, 2015, 10:27 PM | #55 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
See Post # 5. Remember, the original I frame was designed for .32; it was made to take .38 S&W only by reducing the number of rounds from 6 to 5. Later, the frame was lengthened and strengthened to become the J frame and to take .38 Special and then .357, still in 5 shot.
Jim |
November 26, 2015, 09:00 AM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2010
Posts: 647
|
|
November 26, 2015, 12:35 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 24, 2006
Posts: 1,900
|
Sevens- Thanks.
|
November 26, 2015, 01:13 PM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2009
Location: Mid Western Michigan
Posts: 1,187
|
|
February 20, 2016, 10:37 AM | #59 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 22, 2013
Posts: 13
|
Colt Dectective Special
|
February 21, 2016, 09:01 PM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2009
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 976
|
NIB SAA .357 - made in 1979 - hasn't been fired since the factory testing, but soon will be:
CCH is still fresh: |
February 22, 2016, 01:16 AM | #61 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
I'm going to throw this out here, because you folks know old Colts better than I do.
When did the Colt DA revolver become considered "drop safe"? (model and approximate year?) S&W underwent a design change from their turn of the century models to a more reliable drop safety (I think shortly before WWII, or just after -can look it up,), but I don't have reference for Colt. I believe the Colt DA system was considered drop safe before S&W, and am curious about when that began. I only have one Colt revolver, an Agent .38, one of the later guns with the shrouded ejector rod. I rather like it, despite the fact that I thought I wouldn't. I don't shoot it much, but it is a very comforting weight in my pocket when things go bump in the night.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
February 22, 2016, 08:39 AM | #62 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
|
S&W's design became truly drop safe with the adoption of the modern hammer block safety (the free floating L piece) in 1944.
Prior to that there were two earlier hammer block designs, but they could be disabled by dried greases, dirt, etc. As for Colt, no clue.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
February 22, 2016, 12:24 PM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2014
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Posts: 2,033
|
Howdy
I believe the Police Positive was the first double action Colt that was 'drop safe'. They were first made in 1905. |
February 22, 2016, 01:06 PM | #64 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Colt didn't go to the positive hammer block all at once, and the name "Positive" in the model name indicates it has the block. They called it "positive" because it is mechanically controlled all the way, unlike the early S&W blocks which were pushed out of the way by mechanical action, but depended on spring tension to position them to block the hammer, not a good system.
AFAIK, the first Colt to have the "positive" safety was the Pocket Positive in 1905, succeeding the New Pocket, followed by the Police Positive in 1907, succeeding the New Police. The New Service got the block in 1909 at SN 21000, but not the "Positive" designation. All the Model 1909 Army revolvers have it. Jim |
February 22, 2016, 04:56 PM | #65 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
Thank you James, I think that answers my question!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
|