|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 18, 2012, 02:48 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 1999
Location: Longmont, CO, USA
Posts: 4,530
|
While you are correct that he did not follow them outside, he did shoot once through the door at the guy on the ground.
As you said, "the video says it all."
__________________
Gun Control: The premise that a woman found in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is morally superior to allowing that same woman to defend her life with a firearm. "Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house." - Jules Henri Poincare "Three thousand people died on Sept. 11 because eight pilots were killed" -- former Northwest Airlines pilot Stephen Luckey |
July 18, 2012, 03:05 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 265
|
Fine Jimpeel, call the special prosecutor here in Florida that's handling that high profile case we all know about, and have her charge the old man. But if I'm on the jury (a possibility since I live in the same area where the shooting happened) if this video is all the evidence you have, I won't be convicting the old man...and I doubt anyone around here will either.
Yes, one of the criminal thugs got run over by the other criminal thug and he was shot as he was getting up to finish running out the door, but until they finally cleared that door and ran off, they were still a threat to all (the criminals had weapons and there were innocent people inside the cafe.)
__________________
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. ----THOMAS JEFFERSON |
July 18, 2012, 07:20 AM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 16, 2007
Posts: 712
|
robhof
The gentleman's best defense against any charges is his age, as I don't think any grand jury would want to process a 71 year old gentleman, the public outcry would end any politician involved.
|
July 18, 2012, 07:47 AM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 2,016
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member USN Retired |
|
July 18, 2012, 07:52 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: March 1, 2012
Location: United States/Arkansas
Posts: 32
|
Let's get real folks...we all applaud Mr. Williams for his actions but his skill level leaves a lot to be desired.
Let's learn from this...to some extent he was lucky that the bg's had an inert firearm. They were stupid and careless - turning their backs on the crowd demonstrating a lack of control on their part permitted Mr. Williams to go on the attack. If he were better trained and more skilled he would have gotten better hits. At those distances he would not have had to use his sights but training in point/flash shooting should have gotten better hits. What are the shooting requirements to get a CCL in his neck of the woods? |
July 18, 2012, 07:58 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
Aftermath __ Keep your mouth shut !
It's best not to say anything to the media or anyone else .You may be confused ,upset , etc and say things you didn't mean to say. Your words may be distorted and used against you. Later when you've calmed down then with your lawyer you may talk to the police. Never assume you may be treated like a hero ,especially when minorities are involved .I'm sure that the racemongers [Sharpton etc] will be on the case immediately .
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
July 18, 2012, 08:18 AM | #32 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
|
Quote:
send in a check, fingerprints and photo This wasn't TOO far from my house - most of these "internet cafes" (aka video slot parlors) are inhabited by a lot of the retired folks that live here, so not only are they cash cows, most "guests" are older and not as strong or likely to fight back - except for this gent. No charges to be filed from what I saw; although one of the "disadvantaged youths" had to be flown to the hospital in Gainesville via helicopter - hope they bill his family - don't know why, there's a medical center just down the street and another hospital 4 miles the other way |
|
July 18, 2012, 08:49 AM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
Quote:
|
|
July 18, 2012, 08:51 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Let's drop the blood lust - like he should have killed them.
Also, can we avoid technical mistakes? The little 380s do have some kick to them due to the blowback nature. Move beyond the attaboys, please. We want to learn from it. Did he shoot well? Should he have shot at all? Was the last shot at the door legit? Equipment issues - yeah - he should have carried a 1911.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
July 18, 2012, 09:11 AM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 2,016
|
Quote:
But I do not believe that this makes it 'right'. I firmly believe Mr Williams went too far. As we view the surviellance footage, it is pretty obvious that the robbers turned and fled, and that the threat had seemingly ended. We all know that as responsible citizens, we must cease engaging bad guys when there in no longer and imminent threat. I contend that his continued shooting was irresponsible and could have very easily resulted in a tragic situation where an innocent bystander could have been injured or killed. I contend that Mr Williams SHOULD have stopped firing his weapon, especially since we all seem to agree that he wasnt particularly taking careful aim during the incident. I am pretty sure that i would not have continued firing my weapon at fleeing robbers.
__________________
NRA Life Member USN Retired |
|
July 18, 2012, 10:29 AM | #36 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Gosh, we should probably disarm the cops because Williams is apparently much more accurate with his "irresponsible" shooting than most cops. I did like this comment from one of the robbers. Remember that Florida is a state with concealed carry for the last couple of decades or so and pro-gun folks have claimed that crime drops because the robbers fear somebody may be carrying a gun. In short, Florida has had concealed carry longer than each of the robbers have been alive. This comment was classic... Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|||||
July 18, 2012, 10:43 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
I am being fussy about his technique and the first shot looked aimed, the rest were point shooting and looked stressed.
Of course, being an internet denizen, I would have shot like William Tell and Annie Oakley and Jerry Miculek. I don't think his shooting was out of control but wasn't the best technique. I don't think the last shot was out of bounds. Yeah, he could have pulled back but they were still an active threat. I agree with that. Those little 380s, like snubbies, take a bit of practice. I can fire a decent group through one but under stress - that's an empirical question.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
July 18, 2012, 10:55 AM | #38 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
Considering how often bad guys herd unarmed people into a back room and execute them, the notion that a fleeing robber might pause at the door or even outside the door and pop off a shot or three hardly seems outlandish to me. The video CLEARLY shows that the dude with the gun held onto it right up to where he disappeared from view outside the door at the very end of the video. He was a robber, actively engaged in an armed robbery and still holding the weapon. As far as I'm concerned, he was an active threat and even the shot through the door was completely legitimate.
JMHO. As for the punk's view that the "old man" shouldn't have shot him again when he was on the floor, the statement that "I was down, I wasn't going to shoot you" has zero credibility. If the kid had thrown the gun across the room and put his hands up, then maybe he would have had a point. An armed robber with a gun in his hand is an active threat -- period. Don't want to get shot? Don't engage in armed robberies. |
July 18, 2012, 10:58 AM | #39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Quote:
Just like the incident here in Sanford Florida. Give me a break with the chase them down/pursue them and shoot them dead. Surprised at GM's reply
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
|
July 18, 2012, 11:13 AM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
GM - moi? I don't think he left the place after them. He shot from inside at the guy scrambling through the door. They were still in close proximity and certainly hadn't surrendered.
If he chased them down the street shooting, that would be troublesome. That last shot at the door, I wouldn't regard that as trouble.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
July 18, 2012, 11:20 AM | #41 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9
|
Self Defense Heck Yeah
Justice prevails quickly in this instance. I am happy to see this seasoned man take his as well as others safety so seriously. He is my hero. Too bad all states do not have the same laws regarding self defense.
The NRA should use this guy for a new campaign. |
July 18, 2012, 11:27 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2010
Posts: 226
|
Great story!
I never underestimate old guys, I've seen "The Wild Bunch" to many times! Plus, now there is a whole generation of hardcore 'Nam vets who are into their 60's, so you never know who you might be dealing with. Might be a hardcore lifetaker & widowmaker. |
July 18, 2012, 11:34 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2012
Location: Northeast, Fl
Posts: 254
|
"Charges unlikely against man who shot robbers"...they don't appear to be going to file charges. Good news!
|
July 18, 2012, 11:43 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Don't want to shut this, but we are tending towards attaboys and bloodlust again. Don't need that.
Hint.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
July 18, 2012, 11:58 AM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 18, 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 171
|
I think it would be interesting to find out how often this guy has trained or if he had any training and how being under stress can or did change that.
__________________
I'd rather have it and not need it then need it and not have it. "If gun owners are as violent as anti-gunners said we are, there wouldn't be any anti's left" |
July 18, 2012, 12:00 PM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
Quote:
|
|
July 18, 2012, 12:23 PM | #47 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
There's a certain philosophical satisfaction in seeing criminals their comeuppance.
However, we live in a civilized society governed by laws. Everybody deserves due process. When a civilian maims or kills in self-defense, they bypass that system altogether and rob the person they've shot of that right. Sometimes circumstances are such that we can't wait for the system to intervene, and one may have to use lethal force to prevent serious harm in the moment. Such a situation is a terrible thing, and it must be treated with the utmost gravity. Agreeing that a person had no choice (as it appears was the case here) is one thing. Cheering them on for inflicting harm is something else altogether. That is the encouragement of vigilantism. And civilized people don't do that.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
|