The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 28, 2007, 01:15 AM   #1
hknut
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2005
Location: Olympia, Wa.
Posts: 535
Shepard scopes

Anybody have feed back on Sherpard scopes? My question is the bullet drop reticule caliber specific?
__________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce Drunk Driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars"

Walk softly and carry a big SIG.
hknut is offline  
Old December 29, 2007, 01:48 PM   #2
ocharry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2006
Posts: 681
yes i think it is ,, when ordering you have to tell them what caliber it is for

i have a friend that has one on a 375 h&h and he loves it

nice scope


ocharry
ocharry is offline  
Old December 29, 2007, 08:23 PM   #3
AK103K
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 1, 2001
Posts: 10,223
I believe its more velocity/bullet coefficient specific. The same scope can be used with multiple calibers if they fit in the same parameters.

I had one on a 700 varmint in .308 and it worked as advertised. There is no faster, or easier to use scope for ranging. Just put the target into the appropriate circle and squeeze the trigger. You can instantly tell if the zero has been messed with or if you didnt dial the windage back. The vertical and horizontal scale hash marks are also zero repeatable, and allow you to dial off for windage.

Great scopes, you wont regret buying one.
AK103K is offline  
Old December 30, 2007, 12:25 AM   #4
Zak Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 12, 1999
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Posts: 2,682
Here's my analysis of the Shepherd scopes, which I posted over on AR15.com some months ago
Quote:

Per their website, the Shepherd has the following features which give their scopes unique value:

1. one shot zero,
2. range finding & reticle BDC
3. two reticles (one FFP one 2FP), scope malfunction indicator
4. windage indication

Taken one by one:

1. one shot zero -- any scope which has some reticle features and dials can do this. In a mil-dot reticle (or MOA-based NPR2, or similar), you spot your hit with the reticle features and then dial the correction.

2. ranging finding & reticle BDC -- like most ranging finding reticles, the ranging "circles" are based on a specific-sized target, and will be difficult or impossible to use on different size targets. The granularity of distance "data" you get out of the range-finding features is coarse. For example, even if the target is the right physical size for the circles, how do you range it accurately if it's between 700 and 800 yards? You have to guess how close it is to the two different circles.

2a- reticle BDC-- BDC's are by nature calibrated to one load from one rifle in one set of environmental conditions. This is not unique to the Shepherd, but still worth noting as a disadvantage of BDCs. The second problem is similar to the arbitrary-distance ranging problem. If you have a target that you've lased at 765 yards, and your BDC has marks for 700 and 800 yards, you have to guess where in the reticle the datum for 765 would be. This means firstly you don't know exactly where it is, and secondly that you are holding "in space" with no specific reticle feature on the target.

3. two reticles & malfunction indicator-- While there may be some potential use for a FFP+2FP setup, to provide a fine main crosshair yet constant angular features in the observed reticle, the point that having two reticles being more reliable is a red herring. From good scope-makers such as Leupold, Nightforce, Trijicon, S&B, USO, (and I'm sure mot of the sub-Leupold-price options), reticles don't break very often anyway. The reliability thing is a non-issue. Furthermore, while their demo seems to indicate that a 2FP reticle is a potential reliability problem (with "up to 23 things between the reticle and the target")... WHY would they want to do this AND the other? Why not just make one well?

4. windage indication-- Leaving one or the other knob dialed is always something the shooter has to keep track of, when using knobs for windage and elevation adjustments. This is one reason I often prefer to leave my windage knob zeroed and use reticle-feature wind holdoff.

In summary, in my opinion, the ranging system is a gimmick and not practically useful. A basic mildot or MOA-scale reticle will be more flexible. The reticle BDC has the same limitation as any reticle BDC, namely that arbitrary-distance shots are difficult due to lack of a continuous scale, and even then, they lock you into one load/gun/set of conditions. I also see no practical value to the last two features, just that they make the scope more complicated mechanically (and prone to failure) and for the user, since his sight picture changes.
__________________
Zak Smith . DEMIGOD LLC . THUNDER BEAST ARMS CORP . COLORADO MULTI-GUN
My PM inbox full? Send e-mail instead.
Zak Smith is offline  
Old December 30, 2007, 01:19 AM   #5
moredes15
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2007
Posts: 45
Zak is deadnuts on. I had a Shepherd once. Every criticism Zak detailed is right on the money, and are my criticisms of the Shepherd line.

One thing that hasn't been mentioned specifically--Shepherds are good enough for hunting, but their reticles are 'way too thick for all but the most casual target shooting.

Mine wouldn't hold its' zero; I had to send it back for warranty work. It took ~2 1/2 months, and I sold it "immediately". It took me 3 months--there's not much of a market for it among those who're fluent with MOA-based or mildot reticles. For the money involved, I think it makes more sense to go with a Leupold or Burris Black Diamond.
moredes15 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07084 seconds with 10 queries