|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 13, 2007, 11:34 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: December 26, 2005
Posts: 45
|
which is ideal for daily carry: 38 snub or full-size 1911
hello,
im a newbie and i feel the urged to do carry a gun, on daily basis. that would served as my personal defense. as a civilian so far these are my requirements: #i want it concealed close to my body. #has enough rounds and power for personal defense. #easy to use (since i dont go to the range often) #easy to maintain, and most of all, reliable. is 38snub or 1911 perfect candidate for my needs? pls give your inputs. tnx |
November 13, 2007, 11:44 PM | #2 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
.32 pocket pistol like a seecamp or kel tec
WildmeetsallyourneedsAlaska TM |
November 14, 2007, 12:53 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Posts: 81
|
Out of your two choices, the .38 snub. Other than that, a small auto like suggested ^.
|
November 14, 2007, 12:57 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2000
Location: True West
Posts: 1,350
|
Sounds like a S&W J-frame Airweight: 642, 442, 637...
__________________
"You come far, Pilgrim." "Feels like far." "Were it worth the trouble?" "Ah...what trouble?" ~Jeremiah Johnson |
November 14, 2007, 01:53 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: December 26, 2005
Posts: 45
|
correct me if im wrong guys...i find the 1911 cumbersome to be concealed. esp. that im wearing jeans and tshirt on daily basis. but im worried regarding the stopping power and reload aspect of 38snub. i heard alot of talks about it.
|
November 14, 2007, 10:21 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: October 27, 2007
Location: St. Cloud, Minnesota
Posts: 25
|
The 1911 is a hammer. Carry a snubby.
|
November 14, 2007, 10:37 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 19, 2007
Posts: 192
|
My full size 1911 is my favorite hangun, BUT it is too big for CC, I carry either a Colt Pony (.380) or my Colt Dick Special (.38).
I'm looking at getting a Officers model 1911 for carry, and that is just barely concealable. IMNSHO
__________________
That's the way John Wayne woulda done it. |
November 14, 2007, 10:39 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Location: "State of Discombobulation"
Posts: 1,333
|
Quote:
The 1911 is an "Expert's Gun" in my not so humble opinion and there are many people carrying a 1911 that have no business carrying one. Biker |
|
November 14, 2007, 10:46 AM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 4, 2007
Location: Meechigan
Posts: 492
|
I just saw a TV show on the Outdoor Channel, maybe it was Guns and Ammo. Can't remember the name of the gun rag writer, but the name was familiar. He said that during a gun show, he met with several of the other writers, all of whom parrot the 1911-is-the-one-and-only-pistol mantra in their articles. However, all were carrying .38 snubby revolvers. That should tell you something... actually, several things.
|
November 14, 2007, 10:57 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2005
Location: Orange Park, Fla
Posts: 1,019
|
A 3" 1911 or a Commander, I recommend a Bobtail. Either one will conceal as well or better than a .38 Snubby, with a good holster and belt. I have all of these guns so I am speaking from experience. The easiest to conceal and carry IWB is a Lightweight, Bobtailed Commander 1911. then the 3" 1911. The 3 " is the one I carry most because I carry it in my pocket, minimizing the concealment problems. The 3' 1911 is almost exactly the same size as the snubby.
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence in their behalf. - George Orwell |
November 14, 2007, 04:46 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,568
|
While I cannot speak for everyone, . . . for myself, . . . I feel comfortable with my full size RIA 1911 steel, . . . carrying 9 rds, . . . and a backup mag with me.
Yes, . . . I have other weaponry, . . . but since I also have good leather, . . . it is not a "pain" to carry. In fact, . . . the clamshell holster with my Colt Det Spec is far more uncomfortable for me (its a topheavy OWB) than my 1911 in IWB, . . . and is far and away much less concealable than my 1911. I also subscribe to the idea that a 9mm, a 40, or a 38/357 using proper ammo can mushroom up to the size of a 45, . . . but my 1911 starts there. May God bless, Dwight
__________________
www.dwightsgunleather.com If you can breathe, . . . thank God! If you can read, . . . thank a teacher! If you are reading this in English, . . . thank a Veteran! |
November 14, 2007, 05:27 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 28, 2007
Location: In the shadow
Posts: 526
|
Go magnum. Ruger SP101 with a 3" pipe. Inside waist band, behind you, on the right side, given you are right handed. You attacker will not stand around to see where the 5th bullet lands.
|
November 14, 2007, 05:27 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,676
|
I like the 1911 platform, but I have owned only one compact, an enhanced officers stainless. Sorta wish I still had it as it was fully functional and accurate. So how about comparing the comparable sized 1911 to the 38? Like I don't think any of those MV specs on the ammo is starting out from a 3 inch barrel. Probably can say that ball ammo maybe drops to perhaps 700 fps out of the little barrel. The 38 snub can throw a 158 grain bullet a bit faster than that. Lighter bullets don't seem to gain proportionately in velocity from the heavy bullet, so alot of folks shoot the heavy lead and expect decent penetration. If you can conceal a full sized gun and can bear the weight all day, go for it. Some can I guess.
|
November 14, 2007, 08:40 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: December 26, 2005
Posts: 45
|
no doubt with the power of .45cal, i personally submit to that. actually i do have a full-size 1911, 8 rds. however despite being fabled..i do heard alot of negative comments specifically on reliability issues. that it jam, etc. and that revolvers, so far surpass it when it come to reliability aspect. the only obvious advantage that it has, is the reloading issue.
of course reloading a pistol, yes a lot easier,faster compared to a revolver. however im not on a mission to crackdown a terrorist cell, or bust off a ring of druglords. im just a plain civilian. and on personal defense, will the confrontation go more than 6 rds? |
November 14, 2007, 08:43 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: western north carolina
Posts: 1,641
|
do carry a full size 1911 or Double Eagle daily.
|
November 14, 2007, 08:43 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: December 26, 2005
Posts: 45
|
The 1911 is an "Expert's Gun" in my not so humble opinion and there are many people carrying a 1911 that have no business carrying one.
@BikerRN: what should be the proper business in order to be qualified to carry a 1911? |
November 14, 2007, 09:01 PM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 28, 2001
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 4,300
|
An Officer's-length 1911 carries nicely under a loose shirt or jacket. A stainless Kimber Ultra is my most-carried self defense pistol.
|
November 14, 2007, 09:25 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 5, 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 222
|
642 Looks Incredible For Carry.
Anyhow... 1911's Are For Everyone Who isn't 1) Financially Impaired 2) Retarded 3) On Drugs 4) Liberal 5) Hilary Clinton 6) Illegal Alien 7) etc. so if your not on the above list.. your free to own a 1911... But A 642 would be easier to carry. Unfortunately I Would Be Catogorized Under "Financially Impaired" Lol Heres A Review Below On The 642 http://www.snubnose.info/docs/m642.htm
__________________
GLOCK 17 Springfield Loaded 5" Stainless 1911 .45 |
November 14, 2007, 09:55 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: February 15, 2007
Location: upstate SC
Posts: 70
|
I carry a Kimber Full size stainless in a Galco Royal Guard IWB holster every day I'm not working. I carry the S&W 642 snub too as a back up. The sw is nice because you can just throw it in your pocket and go anywhere, but I like the size and power of the 1911
|
November 14, 2007, 10:01 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Location: "State of Discombobulation"
Posts: 1,333
|
Quote:
I've carried a 1911 before, packing an N-Frame now and may switch back to a 1911 again. I don't shoot much anymore though. I'm only on my third case of handgun ammo for the year, plus what I shoot in Quals. I think the trigger on a 1911 is one that requires a lot of training and serious forethought. You had better be able to explain why you shot whomever it was you shot and not utter a silly comment like, "I don't know how the gun went off." You also have to be able to deal with the adrenaline dump that you will have in a life or death encounter. How much do you shoot? Do you shoot in competition? That is a good way to practice firing under "stress". There is a reason that most police agencies do not allow the 1911 except for a very select few. Biker |
|
November 14, 2007, 10:26 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: December 26, 2005
Posts: 45
|
wouldnt you feel undergun with a small revo, while others are bulging with sophisticated autos?
|
November 14, 2007, 10:47 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Location: "State of Discombobulation"
Posts: 1,333
|
No, I don't feel "undergunned" as I practice accuracy, not "spray and pray".
Let's face reality here. For myself, in an Off-Duty encounter I am only interested in preserving my life and the life of my loved ones. I have no obligation to intervene myself in to a situation to save someone that I do not know or cannot identify. The only exception to this would be a Uniformed LEO in a struggle with a civilian. Once the guns come out BG's tend to run away or at least try to avoid being shot. This means they "beat feet". If I need more than what I carry then I should've had a longarm in the first place, and a buddy or three. Biker |
November 14, 2007, 11:03 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 9, 2004
Posts: 5,177
|
Quote:
I've owned five or six through the years, and sold them all. My Kahr PM9 made saying good-bye to those j-frames very easy Six plus one, quick reload, awesome accuracy and (after break-in) perfect reliability. JMHO. |
|
November 14, 2007, 11:44 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Location: "State of Discombobulation"
Posts: 1,333
|
I do believe that a "snubbie" is an expert's gun, but given the two choices I chose the one that I thought would be better for someone that doesn't intend to practice much.
If they were asking for a gun for Home Defense I would've suggested a 38/357 K, L or N Frame Revolver. I opted for the Double Action Revolver over a Single Action Autoloader more so than 1911 vs J-Frame. Biker |
November 14, 2007, 11:47 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: December 26, 2005
Posts: 45
|
i have read several threads regarding home defense. and so far, 38snub was not mentioned. does it imply that its not so ideal for the job?
|
|
|