|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 26, 2012, 09:56 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
Less lag. Quicker burn maybe.
Getting ready for the Fall here and hoping to see a couple of those big flag'en white tails again back in the woods along with their unusual way of getting your immediate attention. (snort/whistle)_ I'm going to have to rely on your experience and/or knowledge concerning musket caps feller's. Been toying with the idea of changing out my #11 nipple to a musket cap nipple on my 54 T/C Hawken.
Questions: 1. Is this an appropriate thing to do with a rifle that's loaded with a 90 grain charge of 2FF Black under a P-ball? 2. What would be the positives? or the negatives I would likely encounter? Not quite period correct as Haug Haggen would say. But hey, it's just a thought._ |
September 26, 2012, 11:39 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
|
1. It's neither appropriate nor inappropriate.
2. Positives are you get a hotter ignition gas and a greater volume of ignition gas; however, with real black there's no need for hotter or more ignition gas. Some folks who have dexterity issues (ie, old farts like me) find them easier to handle, especially in cold weather. Negatives are the conversion costs money and the caps are more expensive - not a great deal of money, but hey, for us old farts pennies matter sometimes. As far as PC is concerned, musket caps are not all that modern themselves, and a T/C "Hawken" isn't necessarily all that PC itself. It is a plains style sidelock, which is a very good thing, but a Hawken it isn't. |
September 26, 2012, 12:09 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2008
Location: Stuart, VA
Posts: 2,473
|
I don't think I'd bother. Never had a problem with percussion caps on my T/C Hawken. I did change my 10 gauge double to musket caps when I heard some folks had issues. Never a misfire with the musket caps on it though.
__________________
Liberty and freedom often offends those who understand neither. |
September 26, 2012, 01:41 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
Quote:
|
|
September 26, 2012, 02:27 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
When I can, I prefer the Musket Caps.
In-Line Hunter;
I have the option to go with any of the three primers and chose to stick with the Musket and have not regretted it. I do use a Musket capper as well. Sure makes a handling difference, during late season. ..... Side-Lock Hunter; Did convert for a time even though I had no real issues with the 11's. Have you made sure that the flange will clear the snail? Also, I can weather seal the 11's where I find it harder to do with the Muskets. .... Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. Last edited by Pahoo; September 26, 2012 at 05:56 PM. |
September 26, 2012, 03:45 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,678
|
I'm no Spring Chicken, but am lucky to still have no dexterity problems.
Even so, I've always used cappers to seat #11 caps and Top Hats. (I never bothered, when using 209's). #11 capper: Top Hat/Musket capper: 209 primer capper: . |
September 26, 2012, 05:31 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
I changed everything I could to musket caps. If I couldn't change, I put improved nipples on, and TC sells one. The only problem I've ever had was getting a '53 Enfield to light, even with a musket cap. Sure takes the fun out of it. Particularly if you experience it while hunting.
|
September 26, 2012, 06:51 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
|
The only reason I can see to change it out is ease of capping with cold fingers. I never had a problem with #11 but it doesn't usually get that cold here.
Strafer you've got to be doing something wrong for a P53 to not work. |
September 26, 2012, 09:04 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,315
|
I think the fire channel is a little thin. I need to get in there with a wire and work it out a little. It is one of the TOW cheapies, and had to be drilled. I think the scraper tends to pack crud in the channel. It might get better with use, if the channel fire cuts a little. It's a bit of a stretch calling it a P53. Still fun.
|
|
|