December 23, 2005, 02:31 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 922
|
Rifle For Elk
I might be going on an elk hunt in Colorado next year, any thoughts on the right rifle caliber? I've read some who say a 30-06 will suffice, and others who say if you get a once-in-a-lifetime shot you'll want a big magnum round. I'll probably get a savage no matter what as that's what I've had the most experience with.
__________________
I've only got two hands, but I've been known to carry three Glocks. RZA |
December 23, 2005, 02:35 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,187
|
For elk, .270 Win is generally considered to be the minimum ethical caliber. From there, it goes up to pretty much whatever you want.
__________________
The test of character is not 'hanging in' when you expect light at the end of the tunnel, but performance of duty, and persistence of example when you know no light is coming. - Vice Admiral James Stockdale, USN (ret.) |
December 23, 2005, 02:37 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 922
|
What about WSM or WSSM calibers?
__________________
I've only got two hands, but I've been known to carry three Glocks. RZA |
December 23, 2005, 02:54 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,187
|
They'll be fine, as long as you're not thinking below .270 WSM. After all, they're just slightly beefed up versions of existing cartridges (powerwise).
__________________
The test of character is not 'hanging in' when you expect light at the end of the tunnel, but performance of duty, and persistence of example when you know no light is coming. - Vice Admiral James Stockdale, USN (ret.) |
December 23, 2005, 06:20 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,899
|
Short answer: Sure an '06 should be fine.
Longer answer: I've shot a few deer with the .30-06, and several more deer with a lesser caliber. For deer, the .30-06 has a lot of what Art Eatman calls "bang-flop". It's very satisfying to hit a deer, hear the hit, and see it go down like a light switch was thrown, and that (minus sometimes hearing the hit) is what has happened every time I've shot a deer with a .30-'06. But then again, I've had similar reactions to deer that I've shot with .257 Roberts loads. The .30-'06, then, is simply more than the minimum rifle that is needed (note: I did not say "too much gun"). So what is the '06 optimal for? Well, an elk is a (much) larger species of deer. Put an '06 bullet through an elk's lungs or heart or into its spine, and you get similar results. I submit that the .30-'06 is absolutely adequate for elk. When I called Sierra Tech Support asking about best loads for the 165g GameKing for elk, they assured me that .30-'06 velocities (2700-2800fps) were great for elk, but advised me not to use that bullet at .300 WinMag velocities (3000-3200fps), due to the possibility of over-expansion at the higher velocities. But Sierra absolutely endorsed their 165g bullet as an elk bullet out of the .30-'06.
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________ |
December 23, 2005, 08:13 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,976
|
Your 30-06 will be fine, easily the most popular hunting cartridge in my home state of Wyoming. Many non-residents go home without firing a single shot during elk season. Takes much gear and a pack mule/horse to get way back where the herds are hardly hunted.
You should consider hiring a hunting guide. There are many game ranches that offer elk and red stag hunts for far less than a fully outfitted Rocky Mt packtrip. Some offer late season cow elk hunts for less than $1,000. Good meat and fun for affordable price. Jack |
December 23, 2005, 08:42 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: February 10, 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 97
|
Depends on bullet placement. I have uncle who took 3 elk every year with 35 Remington Auto. [email protected]
|
December 23, 2005, 10:02 AM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Posts: 2
|
.300 win mag
After using different calibers (3006,280,270,308,338,7mm),for 30 years hunting Elk,my last 6 elk have been taken with the 300 win mag. Excellent trajectory,knock down at extended ranges,bullet and factory load availability options. I have settled on this caliber and recommend it to anyone who asks.
wjb |
December 23, 2005, 10:20 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2005
Location: In the sticks of East Texas
Posts: 185
|
Just one thing .300 win mag or .338 ultra mag there is a possibility of long shots and on the .270 the drop is more at longer distances anything inside of 300 it is perfect but anything outside I believe it would fall much quicker due to altitude but that is my guess
__________________
"Prefection is not attainable,but if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence." -Vince Lombardi "Gun control is putting that second bullet through the same hole the first one made." - Ted Nugent |
December 23, 2005, 11:14 AM | #10 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
The higher up you are, the thinner the air, so the flatter the trajectory. I doubt it's enough to worry about unless you're talking Way Over Yonder, though.
, Art |
December 23, 2005, 11:17 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2005
Location: In the sticks of East Texas
Posts: 185
|
ok I knew it had something to do with it but I was not shure thanks Art
__________________
"Prefection is not attainable,but if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence." -Vince Lombardi "Gun control is putting that second bullet through the same hole the first one made." - Ted Nugent |
December 24, 2005, 08:12 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,323
|
Caliber choice depends on what you already have and what else you hope to hunt with the same rifle. If you have a 30-06, I'd go with that. The 300 Win Mag is hard to beat, but it has more recoil than the -06. I wouldn't think in terms of any shot over 300 yds. That is a long shot.
As was said, 270 is considered the minimum elk caliber. The caliber choices then are between 270 and 338 for the most part. If you intend to hunt grizzly bear or any large bear with the same rifle, I would lean on the heavy side. If not, the 30-06 is good. |
December 25, 2005, 08:49 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Posts: 256
|
Living in Colorado, I see plenty of guys (including buddies of mine) lugging plenty of big bore rifles into the woods.
Funny thing is, they all practice year round and shoot deer and antelope with their .270's and 30-06's, then when elk season rolls around they grab their.338 or 7 MM's. They don't know how the gun shoots, and they don't have time behind the trigger. Anything .270 andup will kill an elk DEAD. If you own a .270, 30-06,or some other applicable rifle that you use frequently and are comfortable with, take the money that you would have spent and buy a plane ticket, get out here, and SCOUT. That will do you more good than 1 inch less drop at 400 yards. In my opinion, you're better off with a slightly lighter caliber that you KNOW inside and out versus some magnum cannon that you don't have the experience with. (edit: Notice that I live in Colorado and big game hunt,and my .270 is my go to gun!)
__________________
--Duck911 |
December 25, 2005, 08:57 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,531
|
30-06 with a quality 180 grain bullet would be perfect. i use 165 grain bullets on deer (box actually has a picture of an elk on it, lol, remington accutip boattails) just because i always want to error on the side of caution, but i think those would certainly be plenty to knock over an elk as well. absolutely devastated the heart of the deer i shot this year, it went down so fast by the time i got my scope back on i thought i'd missed because it was in the brush already. i definitely wouldn't spend the money on a new magnum rifle, you'll do great with the one you trust now.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|