February 23, 2012, 03:44 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 2,018
|
To defend a stranger?
My state says we can use deadly force if:
Quote:
With my luck I'd save a pedophile by shooting the victim's raging father. |
|
February 23, 2012, 03:48 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
That's a good one. For starters, just how certain are you of "who's who in the zoo" when an altercation starts (or you come upon one already in progress)? I'm sure it's often unclear who the "good guy" and "bad guy" are.
|
February 23, 2012, 04:29 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2005
Posts: 3,733
|
Long Island just had a retired NYPD officer responding to a roberry at a neighboring business to his where he shot and killed an off duty ATF agent wrestling with the robber over a gun.
Take the shot and you are liable for the consequences. Unless the situation were outright obvious like a rampage shooter I have observed I am not going to pull the trigger to save a stranger. My nightmare is witnessing a child abduction... I would intervene and would shoot if they refuse to stop but really really hope they do. Kids who are taken very often turn up dead and or raped, at the same time it could be a parent with a nutcase child. I'd rather we all sort it out with an Leo present.
__________________
"Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson "The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin |
February 23, 2012, 04:49 PM | #4 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Here is a defense of a stranger shooting in Missouri that we discussed in Tactics and Training: http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=454222
As that account shows, it is a lot easier to get into trouble with third party shootings than it is to get out of it. Another good example is some of the Force-on-Force training from the Spike TV series "Conceal and Carry School" (available online at: http://www.spike.com/full-episodes/t...eason-4-ep-113). It provides some reality-based scenarios showing how quickly the person you are saving can become your attacker. Given the degree of uncertainty involved in those situations, I would probably opt to be a good witness and call police unless I had a very, very clear picture of what was going on. And even if I had a clear picture, I don't know that I would be all that excited to risk my life, my freedom, and my financial well-being to save someone else who didn't value their own life enough to get a CHL and use it. |
February 23, 2012, 05:33 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: October 20, 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 46
|
I hate to be a coward in my mind but I have too much to lose to defend someone when I am not certain of the situation. Only obvious situation when I might intervene is if a child is involved or if I see a LEO in obvious danger. But even then, I would not jump in without assessing the situation.
|
February 23, 2012, 06:27 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,128
|
As with everything, it would depend on the situation. I couldn't stand by and and let an unarmed woman be beat to a bloody pulp or any unarmed person being attacked with a weapon be hurt or killed because I was afraid to act. You have a moral obligation to protect if you have the ability to do so, regardless of whether you have a pistol on your hip. Two grown men (or women) fist fighting is one thing, I'm certainly not going to intervene, but once certain lines have been crossed then I feel I must. It's purely a judgement call.
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs |
February 23, 2012, 09:44 PM | #7 | |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 26, 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,649
|
Quote:
I think we Americans have always stood up for the victims. I hope we always will.
__________________
No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes. |
|
February 23, 2012, 10:09 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2011
Posts: 990
|
B Roberts, just when your link got me all excited I see in the descriptions on several episodes- Rich Wyatt- ugh
As to defending a stranger, a lot have already mentioned they'd need to be able to be sure what they perceive and what is going on in fact are the same thing. |
February 24, 2012, 12:38 AM | #9 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
Quote:
Under the laws of pretty much all the States, if one comes to the defense of another, the actor "steps into the shoes" of the person he's trying to help; and his use of force will be legally justified only to the extent the person he is helping would have been legally justified in using that force. So if you use lethal force to defend someone who could not have legally used that force himself (e. g., he was the initial aggressor or he had a legal duty to retreat and didn't or he was actually resisting a lawful arrest, etc.), you will be going to jail. The "take home lesson" is that you need to be sure that you know what was actually going on. Quote:
|
||
February 24, 2012, 03:28 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2005
Posts: 3,733
|
I have a moral responsibility to take care of my family; something that is hard to do from jail.
Perhaps I would intervene with a woman getting beaten by a man but I strongly suspect the interference would be announcing the polive had been called and recording rather than shooting. As many LEOs will relate, as bad as you may feel for the woman many of them wind up turning on their would be saviours in domestics.
__________________
"Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson "The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin |
February 24, 2012, 07:16 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Posts: 177
|
Why else carry if not to defend yourself and others from deadly attack? Of course you defend a stranger, if that stranger is being assaulted by an attacker who intends to kill him or her.
|
February 24, 2012, 07:24 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
Against an animal in a heartbeat.
A child vs. an attacker in a heartbeat. Some aging elderly grandmother in a heartbeat. Everyone else gets 911. |
February 24, 2012, 07:49 AM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 13
|
If you have had training why not just shoot the person in the knee or leg with all that time at the range and this is what you get out going to the range to take a life. I would think its to sharpen your skills shot the guy in the leg or arm he still has a chance of bleeding out but atleast you know you didnt shoot'em in one of the kill area's. Just something to think about dont be another gun happy cop that see's a reason to to kill someone. Officer's are suppose to wound the person not go for a kill shoot thats what their trained to do serve & protect i hope.
__________________
"THEY THAT CAN GIVE UP ESSENTIAL LIBERTY TO PURCHASE A LITTLE TEMPORARY SAFETY,DESERVE NEITHER LIBERTY NOR SAFETY" - BENJAMIN FRANKLIN |
February 24, 2012, 07:53 AM | #14 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
How often would you "know" what's happening between two strangers? Yes, there are lots of scenarios we can all invent where we would know. Real life isn't that clean. ------------------- On the "moral obligation" issue... I have no moral obligation to get killed for a stranger. My moral obligation is to my wife and kids. They're the only people I've promised anything. Let's say this "intervention" doesn't go quite as "Superhero-ish" in the real world as we picture it in our Internet imaginations.... and we get killed during our "moral obligation" to help this stranger.... Who has the moral obligation to take care of my family? |
|
February 24, 2012, 08:31 AM | #15 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Furthermore, we really need you to proof-read your posts and present them in a manner that's easier to understand.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
February 24, 2012, 08:36 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,746
|
There are too many scenarios.
Bottom line, for me anyway, is it will have to be clear cut, before I intervene. I mean like if its a 220 pound 25 year old beating a 90 year old lady clear. Edit: I carry around a firearm so I can fight with it, IF I think MY life, or physical well being is in jeopardy. Too many people, in my opinion, have dreams of being the White Knight and fighting crime with their CCW. You had better carefully weigh the consequences and be damn sure, before you get involved.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."- Thomas Jefferson ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ (>_<) Last edited by nate45; February 24, 2012 at 08:43 AM. |
February 24, 2012, 08:52 AM | #17 | |||||
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So in a situation where you or someone else is immediately going to die or be seriously injured if the attacker isn't stopped, you don't shoot people in the arm or leg because it is both a very difficult target to hit and has a low probability of stopping the attack. In addition, the arm or leg has less muscle and bone than the torso - the possibility that a shot exits the target and continues on to injure someone else is increased when the arm or leg is hit. For these reasons, every single federal, state, and local law enforcement agency teaches to shoot center mass of the torso as the preferred target. Quote:
Officers are trained to shoot to stop the attack. Whether the person is wounded or killed is irrelevant, so long as the attack is stopped. However, it is understood that the most effective means of stopping the attack may also kill the attacker - which is why those means are limited by law to very specific scenarios. |
|||||
February 24, 2012, 09:13 AM | #18 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
||
February 24, 2012, 09:18 AM | #19 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 2,018
|
Quote:
Defending those others was definitely not on my radar when I sought to obtain my cc permit. If defending those others was any sort of priority my reasons for carrying would be faulty from the start, its sort of a LEO-wannabe mentality. Quote:
Most of us, as partly evidenced by this thread, mind our own business, have the right mental perspective on carrying and will think before we act. Quote:
Theres also a 50/50 chance you would be protecting someone who would or has voted against ccw in your state. |
|||
February 24, 2012, 11:58 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 3,133
|
These types of scenarios are probably the most difficult. There are so many variables in these situations as described in previous posts that one is really putting oneself and possibly family at risk.
Every situation is different. Unless someone is suffering grave bodily harm or under the imminent threat of grave bodily harm I would not do anything more than dial 911 and be a good witness if possible. If someone is being harmed, then the answer would be - "It depends". No solid answers here.
__________________
Simple as ABC . . . Always Be Carrying |
February 24, 2012, 01:56 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2005
Posts: 3,733
|
Quote:
__________________
"Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson "The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin |
|
February 24, 2012, 04:17 PM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: January 9, 2012
Posts: 15
|
As a Civilian, have you ever had to pull a Pistol on anyone ?
If you did, did you fire ... and what was the outcome ?
|
February 24, 2012, 04:22 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
Respectfully, I think you'll find that for the most part those who have will not be willing to discuss it, at least not in detail. Many may have pending or recent litigation, and others most likely will not wish to air a traumatic personal memory publicly, especially to - no offense intended - a pretty brand new member.
I world direct you to any number of sites searchable on google that summarize "Armed Citizen" encounters. I think Guns Save Lives is one. Just google that term and you should be set. |
February 24, 2012, 04:27 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: January 9, 2012
Posts: 15
|
Can we chat about making 'a Citizens arrest' using a gun ?
When i lived around Chicago , I routinely witnessed from my car , men roughing up their wives/g-f's while in their own car at a stop or men swinging fists at each other outside usually at a Bar . This prompts my post today . Im wondering what the correct protocol is for a typical concealed carry Citizen who needs to halt a life threatening situation immediately, should the occasion ever arise ? Im talking about taking affirmative action after the Police have been notified but before they show up on the scene to prevent loss of life
How would YOU handle a situation of a man beating up a woman severely...perhaps with a blunt object , for example ? Thanks. |
February 24, 2012, 04:32 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 1999
Location: Middle Georgia, USA
Posts: 13,198
|
Moving to T&T.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|