|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 28, 2011, 04:07 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2011
Posts: 8
|
Sight questions from a real newbie
Could someone possibly explain the difference in the following three sights and help me with the advantages and disadvantages of each.
30 mm red dot sight 30 mm 2x red dot sight red dot open 4 reticle Thanks in advance |
November 28, 2011, 04:11 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Location: Kelly nc
Posts: 137
|
Here it goes
The red dot is simply that one red dot. The red dot x2 is two power magnification so it's alittle zoomed in. The 4 red dot just means you have four setting to choose from most likely from a light red dot to a bright red dot. The 30 mm refers to how wide your viewing window is.
__________________
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." - General George Washington |
November 28, 2011, 04:32 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Almost
Most red dots allow the brightness to be changed in several steps, mainly to allow the dot to show up clearly under different lighting conditions. "OPEN" refers to a glass plate out in the open as opposed to a tube with the reticule inside it, a bit like a regular telescopic sight tube. The 4 reticules are usually 4 different patterns of projected image. Depending on who makes them the choices vary. I have one that is a dot (.), a "T" shape(T), an upside down "V" (^) or a dot over the inverted V. (sorry I have no way of faking that last one for you. What's the advantage? Mostly personal preference. I like the dot over a V because it grabs my attention faster than just a dot, but has the accuracy of a dot. It also lets me have 2 sighted in distances, one for the dot, another for the tip of the "V". Here's my open 4-reticule sight. It is actually a holosight, not a red dot, but it's close enough to illustrate the point. It is big, there are many others much smaller. & this is what it looks like with the dot over a ^ in use. The blur is a camera effect only. You use it with both eyes open, but the camera can't do that only having one lens. Holographic sights make the lit up part look as though it is out beyond the end of the gun & sight just floating in space, but you can't see that with a camera either.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” Last edited by wogpotter; November 28, 2011 at 04:49 PM. Reason: found a beter picture of the reticule |
November 28, 2011, 04:36 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Location: Kelly nc
Posts: 137
|
Didn't know that one.
I bet the v would be easy to spot in a hurry. I'd like a upside-down v like a military acog for mine I'm going to look into one of those.
__________________
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." - General George Washington |
November 28, 2011, 04:51 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Yes the small dots don't really grab me, & the big ones that do aren't accurate IMHO.
The "T" which is actually 3 lines with a dot where they meet, or the dot over a V is my second & first choice, a plain V would be my third with the dot alone coming in last.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 28, 2011, 04:53 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Location: Kelly nc
Posts: 137
|
That is a bad ass looking red dot.
What's it on?
__________________
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." - General George Washington |
November 29, 2011, 10:06 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
It is a Russian "Kobra", originally made for the AK series with a side mount, but also was available with a rail mount for the Picatinny rail used by the West. The topcover mount is an ARMS #4 for the FAL. These are hard to find nowadays & so fetch a premium price, somewhere in the $300 range I think!
The more modern, more compact ones are actually better as this is so tall I need a riser to get a good cheek weld. It is incredibly tough though so I keep it!
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 29, 2011, 01:15 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Location: Kelly nc
Posts: 137
|
Does it shoot 5.45 by 39
Or 7.62?
__________________
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." - General George Washington |
November 29, 2011, 01:22 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
7.62X51 NATO aka .308 Winchester or 7.62mm NATO.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
November 30, 2011, 02:59 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2011
Location: Kelly nc
Posts: 137
|
I'm very familiar with 7.62x51
I thought that mag looked a bit big, I just assumed when you said ak family. I want one even more now
__________________
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." - General George Washington |
|
|