|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 6, 2012, 02:17 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2012
Posts: 388
|
chances of hearing damage from different calibers?
what caliber size will minimize the chances of damage to hearing for home defense And that caliber size will still be adequate for stopping an attacker? Thanks
|
November 6, 2012, 02:24 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Without a silencer (aka noise suppressor), none. Some may be worse than others, but all will cause hearing damage from .380 on up.
Worrying about hearing damage is the least of your worries. However, if you go that route, get a suppressor or get electronic hearing protection.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
November 6, 2012, 02:26 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 19, 2007
Location: Montmorency Co, MI
Posts: 1,551
|
Your hearing most likely will be damaged in any self defense action.
Better hearing than all of your bodies-you and family etc. |
November 6, 2012, 02:28 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
All calibers can and will cause hearing damage without the use of a suppressor, although many shoot .22 out of rifles without ear protection which I am guilty of every now and then.
I will share an experience of mine. I had the indoor range to myself and slipped off my hearing protection. I reloaded my 3" S&W model 60 with hot 125gr .357 magnums and pulled a shot off. My immediate reaction was to cover my ears the blast was so great. For a good 6 months after my left ear rang non stop at an unbearing level which was driving me crazy. Its been about 2 years since the incident and my left ear still slightly rings and has high frequency hearing loss. The condition is called Tinnitus, it is a non stop ringing usually resulting from hearing loss/damage. Since then I have no interest in the .357 as a self defense round where I may have to fire it again with unprotected ears. The .357 is considerably louder than most handgun rounds out there, even louder than the .44 magnum believe it or not. I was naive then thinking I needed a big boomer as a carry gun but have since then switched to .380, .38 special, and 9mm for my carry guns. |
November 6, 2012, 02:28 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 164
|
Improper advise deleted
__________________
IDPA Member A00640 Founding Charter Member - Middle Tennessee Shooter's Club Last edited by MTSCMike; November 6, 2012 at 03:03 PM. |
November 6, 2012, 02:28 PM | #6 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
All guns are far too loud for your hearing. Yes, some are louder than others but NONE are quiet enough to NOT do damage.
The sound is creating by the pressure in the barrel, strongly affected by muzzle pressure, so longer barrels and lower pressures are quieter. The bullet noise itself is really not a factor. I would not choose a SD cartridge based on noise level. I would make an effort (in the home) to have electronic hearing protection available should the situation and timing allow for its use. Electronic protection will enhance your hearing and help you in a defensive situation. However, it's obviously not life critical and I'd rather be alive and deaf than dead. Permanent damage can be and has been done by one single shot. I've done it myself. I have tinnitus in my right ear from one single shot of a very loud gun. I had plugs in but it hadn't sealed yet. Trouble is, it's unpredictable. You might shoot for years outside and never have a problem and then one shot and your ear never stops ringing. Shooting indoors is MUCH, much worse. In any case, never, ever practice without protection and make electronic protection available along with your defensive gun. Don't get yourself or your family shot while you try to don electronic muffs but if possible, use them.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
November 6, 2012, 02:30 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
As far as auditory exclusion, your brain may not register the sound of the shot but your ears still take the full force of it regardless of if you remember hearing it or not. Before you give advice, know what your talking about. As Brian can attest, Tinnitus is no fun. Just in case people don't know how this works, there are little tiny microscopic hairs in your ear that pick up sound and send signals to your brain. When your ears are exposed to loud noises these hairs are knocked over and damaged. Picture stepping on grass, it gets pushed down but will eventually spring back up. Repeatedly step on that same spot of grass or put something heavy enough and it will stay flat. Well when these hairs are permanently damaged or die, they are no longer sending signals or the correct signals. These false signals from the dead hairs result in hearing a constant ringing. There is currently no cure for tinnitus, and probably wont be one untill stem cell research becomes more common. Last edited by Dragline45; November 6, 2012 at 02:44 PM. |
|
November 6, 2012, 02:53 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 164
|
I'm going to fire my ear specialist. I just cruised the net and found several sources that indeed say that a single exposure can cause tinnitus.
I stand corrected. My apologies.
__________________
IDPA Member A00640 Founding Charter Member - Middle Tennessee Shooter's Club Last edited by MTSCMike; November 6, 2012 at 03:02 PM. |
November 6, 2012, 03:01 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
|
|
November 6, 2012, 03:03 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
The medical literature contradicts the statement that one loud exposure won't cause permanent damage. Please refer to the peer reviewed literature as compared to the opinion of one person.
Second, if someone said: Quote:
Last, attend me - posters should cease and desist stating that gun shot level noises cannot cause damage with one shot or that you need repeated shots. We have banned folks for such as it promotes dangerous actions. We take similar actions for those who promote illegality. There are no excuses for such postings.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
|
November 6, 2012, 03:14 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 23, 2005
Posts: 462
|
---ah well, I was too slow. Others made my point.
|
November 6, 2012, 03:23 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
|
Can we agree that the potential for hearing loss is significant, and that the differences between calibers is negligible that (a) it should not be a factor in caliber selection, and (b) we should wear hearing protection when practicing?
I would also agree with the "better deaf than dead" argument, but I am more than halfway towards each already. |
November 6, 2012, 03:30 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
The data suggests, as Brian mentioned, that pressure is a key factor in hearing damage. For that reason I favor a lower pressure cartridges shooting heavy, slower bullets for home defense, such as .38 special, .44 special and .45 ACP. .45 Colt would also be a good choice. A .357 mag snubbie is just about the worst choice you can make hearing-wise.
|
November 6, 2012, 06:45 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
|
|
November 6, 2012, 06:49 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2012
Posts: 388
|
Another question I have:
As I came indoors from outdoors, I thought isn't the noise/sound amplified inside? How much amplified will the sound of a fired handgun be in that case since home defense is basically "indoors' should this affect the choice of caliber? thanks |
November 6, 2012, 07:09 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
|
The "amplified" effect you refer to is just the same level of sound but it bounces back and forth from walls, floors and ceilings so rapidly that you perceive more sound. And yes, it does do more damage than outdoors.
__________________
Jim Page Cogito, ergo armatum sum |
November 6, 2012, 09:13 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
Last edited by Dragline45; November 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM. |
|
November 6, 2012, 09:17 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 2012
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 2,989
|
Many years ago a class form then Memphis State University (Now University of Memphis) came out to the range. They were studying noise levels/hearing loss. The professor asked me if I minded taking readings at my firing. I assured him I did not. (Later learned the range office directed hime to me, as I had the loudest muzzle blasts of anyone there.)
They had a device of black plastic that looked about the size and shape of a GI canteen, with an aluminum fixture where the cap would be. He took readings at my right ear (I had my muffs on) as I fired my .357 Magnum, .44 Magnum, and .45 Colt. To my surprise, there was very little difference in the decibel readings. I have that constant ringing from my Army days when ear protection was unheard of. Bob Wright |
November 6, 2012, 11:07 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2012
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 399
|
Bob - like you, in my Army days no mention was made of hearing protection. At the time I thought nothing of shotgun or 1911 blast. We shot M-14s and I shot in competition, but no muffs, no plugs, not even .45 brass in our ears. It is easy to see this by looking at photos of old Army training photos, even ones from Camp Perry.
I have paid the price for that ever since, but thankfully do not have tinnitus. My good buddy got tinnitus about ten years ago from a single shot at an elk, using a .300 Weatherby Magnum with a KDF reducer and no "ears" on. Sucks that his two guides had their own plugs in and did not warn him, but that is 20-20 hindsight. Is there a thread on Firing Line in which posters bat around their favorite electronic ear muffs and reasons why? I'm not looking to spend $200, but would like to be able to wear muffs and also hear what people near me are saying without having to read their lips (which I'm pretty good at, by unfortunate necessity). |
November 7, 2012, 12:00 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I'd say they will all hurt, but some are likely to hurt more.
Last time I checked, a .357 actually was one or two dB higher than a 12ga (assuming service barrel lengths). The .357 was just slightly louder than the .44 magnum. Both of those were louder than the 9mm. The .45acp, .44 special, and .38 special were quieter than the magnums by 4 or 5 dB. Considering that a change of 3dB is a doubling (or halving) of noise, that difference could be significant. In other words, they are all likely to do damage. Magnums, and most rifle rounds, are likelier to do more damage. This is one reason, I admit, for my preference for the .45. (Or, in other calibers, slightly heavy bullets loaded just subsonic.) Last edited by MLeake; November 7, 2012 at 12:44 AM. |
November 7, 2012, 12:12 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 11, 2009
Posts: 329
|
In a home defense situation I would not worry about my hearing. If you have some electronic muffs and time then that might be a good idea to use. Otherwise I want to hear as well as possible.
I understand that you are afraid of hearing damage because I've fired many rounds of .22 when I was young without protection. These days I have significant damage and do not wish to have the least bit more damage but my wife and daughter are more important than my hearing. Use the gun that you shoot the best.
__________________
Portland, Or |
November 7, 2012, 12:41 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: September 4, 2012
Posts: 29
|
Well if your a right handed shooter with a pistol in one hand it would probably be smart to put you left finger in your left ear and press your head into your right shoulder so both ears would be protected.
|
November 7, 2012, 04:07 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 908
|
Firing any gun in an enclosed space is going to be loud... But when it comes between your life and exposing your ears to a few loud blast of gunfire... Your ears take a distant decond to your life.
I do not use ear protection when I shoot .22 or .17 HMR out of a rifle. I do use ear plugs when I shoot my .17 HMR revolver. Its a good policy for whatever you are shooting. I wear ear plugs when shooting handguns. Once you damage your hearing dont expect it to get better. If you feel like dealing with the paperwork and expenses, a suppressor knocks down the noise a lot. |
November 7, 2012, 06:06 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Quote:
|
|
November 7, 2012, 06:56 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2012
Posts: 1,031
|
I had a 12 gage magnum go off next to my right ear, permanent hearing damage from one shot.
At least no tinnitus. |
|
|