|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 29, 2000, 01:50 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 26, 1999
Posts: 1,159
|
Guys,
I don't reload but figured this was the place to get an answer to this question. Why do we still have to endure muzzle flash in our pistols, particularly the hotter loads like 9mm +P and .357 Magnum/Sig. Surely there are fast burning powders (HR38 ?) that can be fully consumed before the bullet leaves the barrel. So why the "tongue of flame" routine. Answers appreciated. Regards, Mike H |
May 29, 2000, 05:08 PM | #2 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Hey, there's muzzle-flash even with Bullseye.
Seems to me if you experimented with a fairly long barrel and a fast powder, you might wind up with very little flash. I'd bet you wind up with very little velocity, as well... FWIW, Art |
May 29, 2000, 05:35 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2000
Posts: 709
|
Like Art said. The fast powders aren't compatable with heavy bullets at higher velocities. For example: a .357 158gr jhp would use, say 2400 powder. Slow burning, but it's needed with a heavy slug. You could in theory load for low flash signature but the chances of having both high performance and low flash aren't very good. |
May 29, 2000, 05:42 PM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,949
|
I'm not positive, but I have read somewhere in the distant past that the flash is not necessarily unburned powder burning beyond the muzzle. It is the extremely hot gases which yield a gas plasma effect. Some powders burn much hotter and therefore brighter than other powders even though they may reach similar pressures.
|
November 24, 2002, 04:39 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 29, 2001
Location: Where the Red Sox meet the Black Bears
Posts: 561
|
If you shoot a .22lr handgun in the failing light of a late afternoon, you'll see a lot of muzzle flash.
|
November 24, 2002, 05:08 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 17, 2001
Location: Farnham, Va
Posts: 2,183
|
As Mal points out, it's the same effect as a fireman opening a door without checking it. The air on his side of the door seems to explode.
__________________
Right turn, Clyde. |
November 24, 2002, 07:11 PM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,949
|
Gosh, I had forgotten I said that 2 and a half years ago!
|
November 24, 2002, 10:15 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 17, 2001
Location: Farnham, Va
Posts: 2,183
|
Damn. I gotta start lookin at the dates man. Had me all freaked out....
__________________
Right turn, Clyde. |
November 25, 2002, 12:17 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 29, 1999
Location: Dewey, AZ
Posts: 12,858
|
It's a firearm...
Ergo....flash of fire. Sam |
November 26, 2002, 10:27 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2000
Location: The hills of Western MD
Posts: 237
|
I imagine one could experiment with different powders and load parameters until the minimum amount of muzzle flash was achieved for an individual gun.
Myself, I load up good ole' Blue Dot in the .357 Mag anytime I want an impressive display of spitzensparken! Whatever the bullet doesn't get, the flames will finish off : ) |
November 26, 2002, 11:26 AM | #11 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,381
|
Mal H, you get the Physics Prize!
Muzzle flash can be EITHER unburned powder burning outside the barrel, a plasma effect from the expanding gas, or BOTH. Flash suppressants put in the powder can help cut this down, but you're really asking for a lot if you hope to totally eliminate flash.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
November 26, 2002, 11:57 AM | #12 |
Staff
Join Date: March 20, 1999
Location: Somewhere in the woods of Northern Virginia
Posts: 16,949
|
Thanks Mike! That's mighty nobel of you to mention it.
[Caution - thread veer coming] Did you notice that three locals won the NP this year? A George Mason prof for economics (second one for GMU); a VA Commonwealth U prof for chemistry; and a member of Associated Universities in DC for physics. Very cool. |
November 27, 2002, 02:26 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 27, 2002
Location: east georgia
Posts: 125
|
MORE, FOR WHAT ITS WORTH............
The flash is a result of the excess oxidizer (given off by the powder during the combustion process) igniting when exposed to the atmosphere. This also results in the "jet" effect that increases recoil, or decreases recoil when directed through a compensator. If you want to minimize the observed flash, -as you stated you are NOT a reloader?: Use the various loadings intended for Law Enforcement use. Several years back, Winchester worked on this problem and applied it to the "Silver Tip" ammo line. They claim to use some type of deterent coating on the powders. The results are dramatic. The old Super-X .357mag. 125gr JHP's I was issued created a "fire-ball" the size of a Basket ball when fired from a 4" bbl. revolver and was blinding at night, a significant problem for law enforcement as most shoot-outs are at night and at very close range. In the mid '90's, I was issued the "New and improved" 145gr Silver Tips. The flash from these are less than most 148gr factory wadcutter loads, though velocity is only slighty less than the 125's. (1450fps w/125's vs 1350fps w/145's) The same applies to the current .40S&W. The Rem UMC 180gr "yellow box" loads and the Federal USA produce substantially more flash than the Winchester Ranger "Talon" ammo currently produced, at least it did the last time I qualified at night back last June. Try obtaining/using either the Silver Tip or RANGER SXT ammo or equivalent from Federal (Hydro-shok) or Speer (Lawman). These should give reduced flash.
__________________
"There is no such thing as a second place winner in a gunfight" Bill Jordan |
November 28, 2002, 12:24 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 26, 1999
Posts: 1,159
|
As the originator of this thread I'm now even more interested in how someone picked it up from over 2 years ago
Way to go Thirties. Mike H |
November 28, 2002, 01:12 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 30, 2000
Location: Token Creek, WI
Posts: 4,067
|
I'm guessing it was diligent use of...
the "Search" function!
(Only because I accidentally did that once, too...) |
December 1, 2002, 06:12 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 6, 2002
Location: long beach.CA
Posts: 116
|
It dont work like one would think. My AMT 30 carbine pistol blows out a flame approx 1/1/2 ft flame about 8" dia. I also own the LONE EAGLE single shot pistol. IN 308 WIN. Got the idea to load some 308 with the slowest burning powder I could find in my book, figured the flame coming out of that barrel would be something to see. Turned out to be a real disapointment not much muzzle flash at all. I shoot 454 down to 22 in hand guns nothing flames like that 30 carbine auto loader..I really like all that muzzle flash.
|
|
|