The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 12, 2013, 04:59 PM   #1
kb2iaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 2, 2006
Location: Oneonta (city of the hills)
Posts: 104
first time i heard of this ....

My Query lies not in the revolver ...nor the auto hand gun section ,
My query is a single shot pistol called the ?? chipmunk . It is or supposed to be a single shot target pistol selling for under $200.00 dollars . Made somewhere in Pennsylvania ..(could this be an AMISH MANUFACTURE ?? Nah ...they don`t do this sort of thing ...Anyone know anything about this product ??? Personally that is ...I have GOOGLED it but would like to know from personal experience if an under#200.00 shingle shot is worth the cost for a youth plinker to teach fire arms safety ..
__________________
DD-657 DD-531 DD756 Freedom,has a taste...and those who fought for it , the taste is sweet...the protected will never know .
VENI VIDI VICI
kb2iaw is offline  
Old March 12, 2013, 05:50 PM   #2
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
The little (really tiny) Chipmunk rifle was first made by Rogue in Oregon, then Keystone Sporting Arms in PA (Milton, IIRC) bought them out and as far as I know still makes the Chipmunk and Crickett. I am not aware that they make a handgun nor of anyone else using the Chipmunk name.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old March 12, 2013, 06:04 PM   #3
BobCat45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Location: East Bernard, TX
Posts: 523
Since I didn't have a clue, I searched for "chipmunk pistol" and found that Cricket does indeed sell a pistol called a chipmunk - go to http://www.crickett.com/products_new.php , near the bottom of the page.

Comes in .22 LR and .22 mag. It says "Action : Manual cocking single-bolt left handed action with a forged steel and machined low scope bolt handle."

Thanks for the amusing mystery!
BobCat45 is offline  
Old March 12, 2013, 06:12 PM   #4
ihctractor
Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 78
".....(could this be an AMISH MANUFACTURE ?? Nah ...they don`t do this sort of thing ..."


Your right, the Amish make and use much larger and way more expensive guns!

Never seen or heard of Cricket handgun.
I once had a .22 single shot revolver. It was mostly made of pot metal and the cylinder was fake. It was a top break, looked like an old Schofield revolver but only had one hole for a cartridge. Don't know who made it or where it got too. I suspect my father, years ago, made it disappear because it was of such poor quality that half the time you pulled the trigger the action would fall open and you had to shove a rod down the barrel to eject the shell.
ihctractor is offline  
Old March 12, 2013, 06:18 PM   #5
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
"Single shot .22's are military weapons with no place on the streets of America." - Obummer

(OK, he didn't say that but only because he was not aware that such evil guns exist.)

Jim
James K is offline  
Old March 12, 2013, 07:26 PM   #6
Bob Wright
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 2012
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 2,989
Savage made a single shot pistol, the Model 101 I believe. It looked like a small single action revolver, but the cylinder was a dummy, and was integral with the barrle. The action rolled out ot the right side for loading and ejecting.

As I recalled it sold for $19.95.

Bob Wright
Bob Wright is offline  
Old March 12, 2013, 07:46 PM   #7
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
That Cricket/Chipmunk sure is ugly. I wouldn't want any part of one of those. I'd love to get my hands on a Savage 101, though.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old March 13, 2013, 11:20 AM   #8
kb2iaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 2, 2006
Location: Oneonta (city of the hills)
Posts: 104
Well O.K. Thanks for the reply's ....So No One Here at this posting has any personal experience or knowledge with this pistol ... ( UGLY ??) Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder ...i would like to exchange some thoughts with an owner or former user ....Thnx anyway .
__________________
DD-657 DD-531 DD756 Freedom,has a taste...and those who fought for it , the taste is sweet...the protected will never know .
VENI VIDI VICI
kb2iaw is offline  
Old March 13, 2013, 10:28 PM   #9
Jbar4Ranch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Wright
Savage made a single shot pistol, the Model 101 I believe. It looked like a small single action revolver, but the cylinder was a dummy, and was integral with the barrle. The action rolled out ot the right side for loading and ejecting.

As I recalled it sold for $19.95.
I had one a few decades back, and found another one locally a couple years ago. The "cylinder" also has dummy bullets in it so it looks loaded from the front.
A little bigger than a Bearcat, but smaller than a Single Six or Frontier Scout.



__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced...

SASS 47015
Jbar4Ranch is offline  
Old March 13, 2013, 11:01 PM   #10
lamarw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2010
Location: Lake Martin, AL
Posts: 3,311
I suspect they are simplistic and will probably never wear out. The weird thing is it looks like all the bolt actions on the handgun open from the left side; therefore the bolts would not be interchangeable with the rifles. I did not follow the catalog. They may make lefty rifles.

I guess if you are a right handed shooter, you would want the bolt on a bolt action handgun on the left side. It almost seems a break-action would make more sense.
lamarw is offline  
Old March 14, 2013, 12:35 PM   #11
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Quote:
I guess if you are a right handed shooter, you would want the bolt on a bolt action handgun on the left side.

Took me a while to figure out the reasoning behing the left handed bolt also till I kinda went thru the loading process in my head, then it made sense. I'm thinkin' in .22WMR, they'd be kinda neat. As far as ugly? I dunno....I've seen a lot of offerings from Ruger that were uglier.
buck460XVR is offline  
Old March 17, 2013, 12:50 AM   #12
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
Aren't they the same as the rifles with a shorter barrel and stock? Same action exactly I think. Anyone who knows the rifle could give the info you want.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07703 seconds with 10 queries