|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 2, 2013, 11:29 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
Con Law 101: Selective Prosecution as it pertains to David Greggory
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Wayne Doyce Mcwilliams, Defendant-appellant 730 F.2d 1218 holds
Quote:
Must they then be in a protected class? Or could one claim selective prosecution for merely NOT exercising a right, such as being a member of the media? Could one claim it is free speech to own one of the illegal magazines, as a form of protest regarding the inaction of the government in something of a hypocritical fashion, possibly resulting in both individuals being prosecuted? (Not something I advocate or have any intention of volunteering for, it's just the example that's out there and "common knowledge" for the commenters) Would one be able to claim selective prosecution for being in a political party not consistent with David Gregory's positions, and thus use Free Association to demonstrate a selective prosecution? |
|
|
|