|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 8, 2012, 05:03 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2007
Posts: 1,204
|
Comparing advertised B.C. w/Independent Measurements
Some of you may be aware of this report already but its a good read. This was a independent study performed by the U.S. Air Force Academy that "addresses the question of ballistic coefficient accuracy. This project compares ballistic coefficients advertised by four well known bullet companies (Hornady, Nosler, Sierra, and Barnes) with those measured by an independent source (Bryan Litz). B.C.s were determined using calculations at the JBM Ballistics web site. Many published ballistic coefficients are significantly different from independent measurements."
See the report here: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA554683 Last edited by Brian Pfleuger; October 9, 2012 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Makes more sense to link to the report.... |
October 8, 2012, 09:09 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,476
|
Good information, I hadn't see the report. Most BC's were found to be within 5% of the published values. I know Sierra lists multiple BC's for each bullet based on velocity. I wonder how they selected the BC to use for their comparison?
Bullet Name FMJBT Diameter inches .224 Weight grains 55 Sectional Density .157 Ballistic Coefficients .272 @ 3000 fps and above .245 between 3000 and 2400 fps .235 @ 2400 fps and below |
October 9, 2012, 11:03 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2007
Posts: 1,204
|
Not at all surprised that bullet makers would fudge the numbers a bit because its all about selling product. I don't think its necessary because most hunters don't reload and don't care, and target shooters/reloaders will select the bullet with the highest b.c. value anyway.
|
October 9, 2012, 06:31 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2002
Posts: 2,832
|
Calculating BCs from form factors is pointless; just shoot the things, get muzzle velocity and downrange velocity, then work from that.
|
October 10, 2012, 07:35 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 3, 2002
Posts: 1,264
|
I think it's laughable that BC's are published to 3 digits.
|
|
|