|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 17, 2014, 11:34 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Tell me about your big-bore choices.
I've been following various threads on big-bore handguns and I've decided I want some more personal experiences to digest. Your .44s, .460s, .480, .475s, .500 etc
Basically, I'd like to know what you've chosen, and why. Even if you haven't bought it yet. Me first. I went for lil' ol' .44Mag. It boils down the RH .44 was the only revolver in the shop that I could afford, thanks to a complicated twist of events. A good thing too as it got me into reloading and big-bore shooting appreciation!! It was bought to act as my woods gun but I've come to really appreciate what you can do with the round even if I've just begun to scratch the surface of its potential. It suits my requirements for woods protection. Other calibres intrigue me, so what of the other big bores? What do they bring to the table?
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
August 17, 2014, 11:40 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,264
|
45 Long Colt
There are loads from cowboy powder puff thru near elephant medicine on the books. My Ruger can shoot them all! My current load of choice is a ~260 gr bullet at about 1350, if I remember right. It's great fun! Sure, 480 Ruger would be fun, but I want an SA gun. 44 mag is pretty good. 454 Casull offers a bit more than the LC, but at a price. 475 Linebaugh will be in my stable someday, but not soon. Oh yea, and handguns really need to be shootable with a 7.5" or shorter barrel! |
August 17, 2014, 11:55 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
The largest bore handgun I've ever had was the .44 Mag, too.
Never saw a reason to go bigger, especially with all the loading and bullet choices available. Haven't had one for a long time, but I'm thinking about it.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
August 17, 2014, 12:07 PM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Last edited by Pond, James Pond; August 19, 2014 at 04:14 PM. |
||
August 17, 2014, 02:01 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
|
I have a variety of S&W revolvers in .44 Mag....both model 29's and
629's....in 3", 4", 6" and 8 3/8"....and I like them all... ( the 3" is a 629 Trail Boss...its an RSR gun, and its ported )...its fun to shoot, a little bit, but a box of 50 rds is enough for one day / because it jumps a little. In the 6" or 8 3/8" barrels ...the .44 mag is easy to shoot / in 4" follow up shots are still difficult - or slower than a gun chambered in .357 Mag as an example. The only round I shoot in .44 Mag is a full power 240gr JSP ( Montana Gold bullet that I reload ) but the load specs are similar to Mag Tech ammo. I don't go to velocities beyond the published tables for reloading. ------------- I am contemplating another Freedom Arms single action ...large frame, 5 shot ( I have one that I had made in .357 Mag that I shoot a lot -- its a 4 3/4" Octagonal barrel at about 55 oz .).../ but if I order another one made in .454 Casull or .475 Linebaugh...I will go with a 6" or maybe 7 1/2" barrel... The Freedom Arms revolvers are pretty heavy ...not easy to carry ...but for me, they'll just be range guns ...vs hunting for big game / I'll use a rifle, if I want to hunt big game ( but I did a lot of that when I was younger..Elk, Deer, Black bear, Antelope....) and I've lost the urge to kill anymore.. ----------- In the north woods, in Grizzly country, a .44 Mag is pretty light ...and a handgun is not what I'd want against a Grizzly ( not even the smaller Grizzly in Montana / vs the bigger Brown bears in Alaska )...so I don't consider a .44 mag really a practical woods gun / but a 3" or 4" are pretty easy to carry, if I wanted to ( any N frame holster would work ) - and it would be better than nothing...but not better than a slug out of a shotgun or a good rifle. Outside of Grizzly country ...a .44 Mag or even a .357 mag is plenty for a woods gun in my view. A 4" .357 Mag is a very quick gun - and easy to shoot / easy to carry hiking, fishing, etc... I like the ballistics of the .475 Linebaugh a little over the .454 Casull...and it is less snappy than the .454 Casull in general ...for the few rounds I've fired in friends guns. While I understand the attraction to large bore handguns....I know my limitations with some arthritis in my hands and wrist...and I won't shoot any caliber bigger than the .44 Mag too much...and $ 4,000 for another Freedom Arms, when I already have one I love in .357 Mag, doesn't really make any sense...and I sure wouldn't carry a big single action weighing 60+ ounces anywhere.... I only know one guy that has the S&W 460....and he says it is not very accurate with .45 Colt or .454 Casull ....so he only shoots it in .460 which is punishing...and he only puts a box or maybe 2 thru it a year... Last edited by BigJimP; August 17, 2014 at 02:10 PM. |
August 17, 2014, 03:11 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Quote:
But there's plenty of others, up to 330 grain loads for serious hunting, either home made or from Garrett and Double Tap.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
|
August 17, 2014, 05:43 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: Campbell Ca
Posts: 1,090
|
Another nomination for .45 Colt
Give me the 270 gr, cast lead, SAA bullet at 1,000 fps (plus or minus) and that's all I will ever need.
|
August 17, 2014, 06:32 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,452
|
I've used the 44 Mag and 45 Colt quite a lot and have killed game with both. They are both excellent cartridges and in the right guns are up for about anything in the lower 48. If you want a DA revolver, there are more choices in the 44 and you're a lot more likely to find a deal on a DA in that caliber. But I eventually settled on the 45 Colt and was quite satisfied with it in a heavy-frame Ruger SA revolver.
Time changes our priorities and I now find myself with a Glock 30 as my main bigbore handgun. I will probably, at some point, set it up for 45 Super or maybe a 460 kit. I used the 45 Colt with Sierra's 240 JHC at about 1300 fps and it was a killing machine. These ballistics are easily attained by the 460, so I probably don't need another handgun to hunt with. Biggest thing we have here is black bears, which have finally migrated to my area. I have shot the 480 Ruger just enough to be thoroughly impressed with it. Impressed enough that if a bargain on a 480 SRH crosses my path, I'll probably buy it, cut it down to about 5" and remount the front sight.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice. |
August 17, 2014, 07:45 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
|
I've got a BFR 454 7.5" and a Blackhawk 45 Colt, short 4.62" bbl.
I love the .45 Colt, and although I didn't need the BFR, I like the 454 too and it can be loaded from any way you want, from fairly tame to wrist breaking. So, while not needed, I love it's versatility. A 255-270gr hardcast at 1000 fps is enough to kill almost anything, but sometimes it's just plain fun to let off a some of the big boomers. I will say, that for the price ($800) the BFR is a superb deal. It's got a hand lapped barrel, recessed chambers, locking base pin, and it's SOLID. It's essentially a nicer finished Ruger Blackhawk. They're also super accurate. I've got a big bore Glock too, a Gen4 G21 with a KKM comped barrel. Messing around with .45 Super I've got 250's running 1300 fps, which is stout. It's not a Colt or Casull, but it's no joke either. |
August 17, 2014, 08:31 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,786
|
I've shot the really big hand cannons, don't need them. I'd rather carry a light, shorter barreled carbine in a true rifle caliber than one of the truly big handguns. A 3" to 4" Smith 29 or 629 is as big as I want to carry in a handgun. I actually end up carrying the Glock 20 more. If those won't suffice a short rifle will.
|
August 17, 2014, 11:49 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2010
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,679
|
I'm a 45 guy,45auto,45Colt,454Casull Love them all.My choices go from mild to wild to a down right BEAST.havent ever found anything I wanted to do with a handgun that one of these 45's would'nt do in grand fashion.Just old school if You can't do it with a 45 I dont want to do it.:
|
August 18, 2014, 12:09 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
|
Just this past spring I aquired a Springfield Armory Champion. 45ACP 4" barrel. Use this for my carry pistol.
My big boy is a reproduction Colt Walker. Shoot 44 cal round lead ball over 40 grains of Pyrodex RS. (same as FF black powder). |
August 18, 2014, 12:41 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,753
|
I first chose a 10-inch barrel for my single shot T/C Contender in .44 Magnum. It was horrendous to shoot, the entire rig is simply too light. I still have the barrel, it's been years since I've shot it.
Just about two years ago, I bought a lightly used vintage Ruger Redhawk with a 7.5-inch barrel and the original wood stocks. It's far heavier, but still quite punchy. I removed those wood stocks and put a Pachmayr decelerator on it, and that helped. But far more helpful was the four-port job that Mag-Na-Port did on the revolver for me. It's so much more pleasant to shoot even the warmest handloads I build for it now. 1,385fps with a 240-grain LSWC does not beat me up too much and I enjoy shooting that load, but I put more of my light load through it... 870fps with a 240-grain LSWC. The light load is more friendly to the steel plates at my club. I had a very nice Smith & Wesson 657, a 6-inch stainless .41 Magnum, but even with a Pachmayr decelerator on it, it pounded my hands far more than I enjoyed. Kept it more than a year and tried to love it but couldn't. It went away. I miss that revolver in and of itself, but I don't miss shooting it at all, for sure. I've shot a handful of .460 and .500 Magnum from the big X-frame Smith & Wesson revolvers and it blows my mind how well they designed those big rigs to handle recoil. I believe it must be the compensator on them, I find them a hoot to shoot and perhaps it's because simple economics prevent you from sending 50 rounds down range in one session, but they're just more enjoyable to shoot than most "regular" .44 Magnum guns. I had a Desert Eagle .50 AE for a bit, it was mostly just to give it a twirl because I got a good deal on one, and I found that it wasn't all that bad to shoot, but I find the gun cartoonish and the ammo frightfully expensive, so I couldn't keep the gun. I'm not much for big bores, and I believe I'm covered with my .44 Mag Redhawk. But I can say that if I were to get some other big bore (or bigger bore), it would be the .460 Smith & Wesson, mostly because I find that appropriate .452" bullets are less costly and easier to find. Nothing else really interests me, and I doubt I'll even get the .460.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
August 18, 2014, 02:06 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quote:
No slouch at all!!
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:52 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Transplanted to Ridgeland,SC
Posts: 606
|
my choice for 44
for me its a matter of convenience that I chose the 44.I have 2 44 mags a 44 spl and a Uberti 7.5in Remington outlaw with both a 44-40 and 44 spl cylinders.I cast my own using a Lee 200 gr rnfp so I can use the same mold for all of them.The mold drops a little heavy at 212 grs with my alloy of wheel weights and monotype but it is a very accurate bullet in all of them.
|
August 18, 2014, 01:43 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,522
|
Being a long time fan and shooter of big bore guns I still love the 44mag the most.
To me the 44mag does what I need in a large bore hand gun. Larger, more powerful guns have their uses if attacked or hunting bear or elephant. But for the average threat or use the 44mag has it covered. Not to mention the lower cost of re-loading and less recoil.
__________________
Texas - Not just a state but an attitude! For monthly shooting events in DFW visit http://www.meetup.com/TexasGunOwner-DFW |
August 18, 2014, 02:51 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2006
Location: Homes in Brooklyn, NY and in Pennsylvania.
Posts: 5,472
|
recoil
about the .460 vs the .44 Rem mag....
Quote:
__________________
“Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports ... all others are games.” Ernest Hemingway ... NRA Life Member Last edited by darkgael; August 18, 2014 at 03:05 PM. |
|
August 18, 2014, 03:43 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2013
Location: Pahrump Nv USA
Posts: 480
|
44 Mag here as well. Where I live there isn't anything much larger than a mountain lion. The larger more powerful rounds require handguns that weigh about as much as a rifle, (or so it seems at least).
If I was to take a trip to where something really big and mean was available to cause me harm, I think I would buy some slugs for my shotgun and save myself about $1,000. |
August 19, 2014, 09:05 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 1, 2012
Posts: 225
|
I have a 500 (4 inch) and 460es (2.5 inch) but they're really more range toys (the 460es shreds dropped ceiling tiles at the indoor range). Also have a Desert Eagle in .44 that's a lot of fun but weighs a ton. All 3 as "fun guns" are wonderfully entertaining
Over the years also picked up a S&W 629 PC (snub .44 mag) and a Ruger Alaskan .454. Those are "somewhat more practical" (they don't weigh nearly as much) but not nearly as much fun to shoot. I think my regular 629 and Ruger SBH (especially the hunter model) are the most "fun" to shoot without getting worn out. They'd make good hunting guns I think as well from what I've read (if I were ever inclined to take up handgun hunting). Otherwise, while not really a big bore a Ruger BH .30 Carbine gives you the "feel" of a big bore without the recoil. On a different note, also found a Ruger Old Army (.44 Black Powder) that's pretty neat as well. I'd recommend it if you were tempted by BP. Last edited by DealHunter; August 19, 2014 at 09:12 AM. |
August 19, 2014, 11:06 AM | #20 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,617
|
Big Bores, Basically, I'd like to know what you've chosen, and why
My fascination with big bores began back in the early 1970s, thanks to Guns&Ammo magazine, assisted by Shooting Times, and, of course, The American Rifleman.
These were always around the house, my father was a sportsman, conservationist (before the wackjobs discovered ecology), and was an NRA certified Rifle & Pistol instructor, who gave Hunter Safety courses every fall. Elmer Keith, Skeeter Skelton, Charles Askins, Bill Jordan, and a host of others I knew well, from their writings. I think I might even have learned a thing or two from them... Dad had several handguns, but no "big bore" other than a Colt Govt model .45ACP. The "cannon" in the house was a S&W Highway Patrolman .357 (6"). Besides reading all about them, I think the thing that really set me on the path of big bores was an ad in the early 70s in G&A, for the new .44 Auto Mag. The ad was full page, and on cardstock (thick) paper, with a life size picture of the gun, perforated, so you could punch it out and hold it. The ad claimed a 240gr bullet at 1600fps from the 6.5" barrel. And the header said "Strap a Rifle on your Hip!" Although I was still a few years to young to buy my own handgun, I wanted one. Even found one in a sporting goods store some 40 miles away. Never could convince my Dad to buy it (probably because of the expense, we never had much money). At the time, a S&W M29 cost $283.50 MSRP, and the Auto Mag was over $100 more! I watched that gun sit on the shelf, for years, and watched the price go up, and up. It was still sitting there, with a tag of $695 when I went into the Army. And, naturally, when I got out, it was gone. 1983 was the year I became a true big bore owner. I had gotten a .45acp in 1980, and in 83, I got a Ruger Blackhawk (7.5") .45 convertible. I got it with the idea of shooting the .45acp, and not having to hunt for the brass to reload. But I made one small mistake. I shot it with .45 Colt ammo, first. WOW! I was hooked! And so it began. I did experiment with the heavy "Ruger only" loads, and then settled on one load, 250gr swc at 1100fps (actually just a hair under). That same year, I found, and after getting a personal loan (it cost more than the car I was driving at the time), was able to buy a .44 Auto Mag. The .44AMP taught me a lot of things, and since then, I have gone on with other big bores Desert Eagle .44Mag, S&W M29-2, Ruger SUperBlachawk, T/C Contender, Ruger Vaquero, all in .44 Mag. Also more Rugers (Vaquero, Bisley) in .45 Colt. And the .45 Win Mag, in the Wildey, and LAR GRIZZLY pistols. I deliberately avoided getting any of the larger calibers, as they came on the market. I passed on the .454, .460, .480, and the .50s. There was nothing I do (or CAN do) with a handgun where the higher power of these rounds gave me any benefit over the .44s and .45s that I already had. Also saved the expense of tooling up for the other calibers. I found magnum power autopistols to be an interesting breed. Very different from magnum revolvers, and a much different feel, even when shooting the same ammo. Also, by personal choice, I never bothered with the uber heavy for caliber bullets that are so popular with some folks these days. 240/250gr slugs, cast or jacketed always did everything I ever asked them to do, and more besides. So I don't bother with the 270, 300, or heavier, and get a small smile from the internet experts who recommend them. Not the people who use them for some applications, but the people who recommend them for everything (on the net) and imply that anything less is mouse pharts, that amuses me. .44Magnum .44AMP (Auto Mag Pistol) .45 Colt .45 Win Mag These are my big bores in the magnum power class, in autopistols, revolvers, and Contender barrels. I'm also fond of various .357 calibers, but they aren't "big bores" even if they have the .44 size case (.357AMP). So, I've spent 30+years collecting them, and shooting them (some much more than others), its been more than enough to keep me both busy and satisfied, and I haven't gone on to the new rounds I think of as "monster magnums". If you've got a .454, .460, .50AE, .500S&W or what have you, that's fine, enjoy it. They just aren't for me. Oh, yes, I almost forgot my other "big bore", the .45-70, in a 14" Contender. That is a handful with some loads, too!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
August 19, 2014, 12:45 PM | #21 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 21, 2012
Location: Woodhaven MI
Posts: 477
|
I have one Super blackhawk 44 magnum revolver and that's it for big bore revolvers right now. I like it a lot, but I prefer my 357 Magnums for plinking and target shooting because they're a little cheaper to shoot and just as much fun.
I don't hunt much these days, but if I had to choose between a 357 and 44 for hunting with a handgun it would be a tough choice for me between my SBH and 686. The 44 Magnum is obviously more powerful, but a 357 Magnum is no slouch and I can shoot them just a little bit more accurately than I can the 44. It would ultimately come down to what I was hunting. Anything bigger than a large Michigan or West Virginia deer and I'd take the 44 magnum. |
August 19, 2014, 02:09 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Let's see... big bore...
Revolvers
Semi-autos
Last edited by spacecoast; August 19, 2014 at 02:14 PM. |
August 19, 2014, 02:56 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,753
|
44AMP, I know you are very much "set in your ways" at this point, and guys like you simply won't jump on the latest & greatest, the fads or funny new stuff, but my own personal experience has been that .460 Rowland is a heckuva lot of fun to shoot. I doubt you'd chase after one, but if you get the chance to shoot a modified 1911 pistol with the Clark/Rowland conversion, I'll bet it would light your eyes up.
It really flings a bullet and without a lot of associated nonsense. I did not keep the one that I had, but it sure wasn't because I didn't like it, the thing is an absolute hoot to shoot.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
August 19, 2014, 04:17 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quote:
I read that the .480 seemed to give lower recoil because of its lower pressure. I think the bullet weight and gun weight disparities would need to be pretty big for the .460 to feel tamer than the .44!!
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
|
August 19, 2014, 04:20 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
|
My "heavy hitters" are;
44 magnum from either my 5" Super Blackhawk or my 4" M29. 320 grain LBT gas checked Wide Flat Nose bullet. 21.5 gr of 296 and a magnum pistol primer. My "heaviest hitter" is a Freedom 454 Casull. 370 Gr LBT gas checked Wide Flat Nose. Small rifle primer 25 gr 296. I have killed a lot of game as well as large domestic animals (horses and cattle) with all 3 of these guns and the results have been all I could ask for. Kills with the 44 are about equal to what I have seen in 45 years of hunting from 308s, 300 Savage 30-30s and 8mm Mausers. I have killed elk, buffalo, deer, antelope and cattle with my 454 and the results remind me of the kills I have made with my 338 Mag. I have only ever recovered bullets from the 44 mag loads 2 times. Once when my friend Joe killed a large moose with his 6” M-29 with 2 shots. One went about 36” and exited, and the other went 45” and we found it under the skin. Another time I recovered a bullet from a large beef cow I killed (bull actually) that broke the upper leg bone and was found under the skin at the back of the rib cage on the other side. I have yet to recover a 454 370 gr bullet from any animal. Exit wounds on every one so far. I have killed 27 large animals ( From 150 pounds to 2,100 pounds) with my 454. I can’t seem to keep a bullet inside any animal I shoot with it. I am very very pleased with how well it works. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|