|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 8, 2014, 08:44 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 19, 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 578
|
generic bullets versus premium
i really dont see the point of all the hype of the newer generation bullets. Sure the newer bullets promise perfect results but i dont see the worth of them.
Did some testing today. newspaper compressed in a box, backed by a 1/16 steel tray. that was backed by a 20 inch thick rotting stump. at a really close 15 yards i blasted away. 4 rounds 110 grain sjhp 38 +p 3 rounds 130 grain rem umc standard 38 special 7 rounds standard 38 special 158 grain lrn they all did the same things to the test target. hit, entered, penetrated, shredded newspaper, and blew through the plate and dissapeared into the stump. the end. dug half way through the stump, found NONE. |
August 8, 2014, 09:03 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
|
sounds like you need a better test media......
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed |
August 8, 2014, 09:08 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,510
|
. . . ^^ +1 ^^
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
August 8, 2014, 09:15 PM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 19, 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 578
|
I really could use better target, but when the "outdated" 110 grain +p sjhp expands and still penetrates like a 158 grain lrn, i somewhat doubt the need to pay 30 dollars for a box of 20 premium bonded 110 to 130 grain bonded jhp ammo.
if my 20 year old 35 dollar a box of 50 round generic hollow points are still labelled as self defense/target/think skin game animals(some brands do say that) then why pay more for something that i can rarely ever find in store or online? |
August 8, 2014, 09:56 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,510
|
I know what you're saying.
I got into shooting in 1983. At the time, most all defense rounds were JHP's with the top half of the bullet being exposed soft lead. I believe they most likely worked just fine. And I rather doubt that modern designs (where the copper jacket goes all the way to the tip of the bullet) are significantly better. Shot placement is everything. Years ago, Federal made a 357 Mag 125g JHP where the hollow point was a cave; and it was a hot round to boot. I bet it was a highly effective defense round. Speaking of hot rounds, Remington's 125g JHP was a monster of a round back then. And in terms of 38 Special, I still think a soft swaged 158g LSWC HP (think Speer) is as effective as anything being produced today. I can't imagine a Hornady 158 XTP being ballistically superior in 38 Special; in fact, I know it's not.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
August 9, 2014, 07:37 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: September 1, 2013
Location: Poland
Posts: 41
|
Ballistic gel would give you more accurate results but you're right.
Modern loads aren't significantly better than what people shot 20, 30 years ago. |
August 9, 2014, 08:28 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,786
|
I think it depends.
A 38 Special is one of those rounds that doesn't benefit nearly as much from improved bullet technology. Most of the premiums work better in rounds leaving the muzzle at 1000 fps or more. The problem in the past was getting fast bullets to perform well after contact. Either you used fmj that would stay together and get deep penetration with no expansion. Or take a chance on the cheaper, older HP designs would often expand violently and give poor penetration. The premiums improve performance of rounds like 38 and 45 ACP, just not as dramatically as they do with faster rounds. |
August 9, 2014, 08:52 AM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 24, 2006
Location: N.E. Oh.
Posts: 527
|
You do need better test medium and a whole lot more testing to draw any kind of conclusions.
Even gallon plastic water filled jugs ain't all that bad. In fact can come close to b-gel. If you are serious about terminal ballistics I suggest b-gel & lots of measurments & notes, else nothing can be concluded with any hope of accurate data. A chrono is a good idea to. |
August 9, 2014, 09:18 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2002
Location: The same state as Mordor.
Posts: 5,564
|
Quote:
(I shoot cast lead handloads, almost exclusively.)
__________________
"As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven. " |
|
August 9, 2014, 01:30 PM | #10 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 27, 2013
Posts: 1,139
|
The newest ammo is the most likely to properly expand in the most varying circumstances. All HP ammo is better than FMJ.
The reason to buy premium ammo is to give yourself the best possible chance of surviving when you might only get one decent hit. I bought one box of premium JHP 15 years ago, and that's what I still have on hand, should I choose to carry. Unless you are re-chambering it multiple times, ammo doesn't go bad over time. One 20 round box of the good stuff is a reasonable investment. |
August 9, 2014, 01:45 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 3, 2006
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 998
|
I think 9mm rounds have seen real improvement in last few years. A few years ago it seemed that a lot of people were going to 40 S&W or 45. Now it seems that 15 + rounds of good 9mm hp rounds is a pretty good load out.
I reload for my range shooting, so I don't mind spending some extra for my SD rounds. Carrying critical defence right now seems to have good test results |
August 9, 2014, 01:49 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
|
|
August 9, 2014, 02:03 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
I'd submit sophisticated, highly instrumented testing will show that at 15 yards and less that the differences in effects of $ vs. $$$$ bullets are minimal. At long ranges, YMWV.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
August 9, 2014, 04:39 PM | #14 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 19, 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 578
|
but there so accurate and fun to shoot.
|
August 12, 2014, 04:10 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
what matter$ mo$t? the wor$t that can happen.....
If I shoot paper any accurate bullet works.
If I shoot animals to eat the bullet choice matters. But if I shoot people all I got is that bullet; ay?
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
August 12, 2014, 04:43 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 1, 2001
Posts: 10,223
|
As far as using older ammo, you do need to be mindful that there is the very real possibility it can and does in fact "go bad". This isnt a failure of an older era bullet design, but an overall cartridge problem.
Ive encountered it with both rifle and pistol ammo over the years, and its been varied in how it did go bad. Some rounds simply misfired, some were hang fires, and some had cases that failed, both before being fired, and while being fired, caused by powder degradation. How the ammo has been stored, also seems to have a direct bearing on how things progress too. Personally, I keep fresh ammo in the guns I count on for anything serious. Its not so much about the design of the bullet, as it is about the round actually functioning properly when called on to do so. While I do generally use whats deemed acceptable and issued by agencies that can afford to do the research, I would not be too upset if it were simply "ball". If the latest design should fail to work as it should, its going to be basically the same thing anyway, and regardless what you use, its still a pistol, and the drill remains, "shoot them to the ground". Thinking you got a magic bullet thats the Sword of Todd, is dangerous thinking. |
August 13, 2014, 01:24 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 2,118
|
I shoot whatever the local police department or state troopers use.
Why? Because if (God forbid) I ever have to use one of those bullets, I don't want the prosecutor to be able to say that I was trying to kill someone due to "super killing shredding pulverizing extra lethal" ammunition. All it takes to discount such a theory is putting the police chief or a trooper captain on the stand and ask them what their department issues to their officers. Then ask if they're designed to be more lethal than any other bullet type out there. They say, 'no, they're designed to expand on impact and stop the threat'.... Then I would have a high-ranking law enforcement official defending my choice of defensive ammunition. Call me crazy, call me paranoid. But I carry the same ammo type that the local PD does, right now, it's Federal Hydra-Shok.
__________________
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." -Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights. |
August 13, 2014, 07:25 AM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
|
Quote:
"Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury.... I submit to you that this man intentionally carried the same dangerous and deadly ammunition as our brave men and women in blue... This was not for defence of his life... No, no, no... This was sadly and tragically due to his deep seated want to kill someone... And he did..." 6 of one, half dozen of the other? |
|
August 13, 2014, 11:26 AM | #19 | |
Junior member
Join Date: September 6, 2013
Location: Kitsap County, Washington
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
With the older Remington SJHPs, the scalloped jacket would cut the lead nose into six small fragments. |
|
August 13, 2014, 12:22 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,341
|
What I have found is that in some calibers, there are now more choices in bullet construction and more bullets are purpose related and not just the basic "good for everything" bullet. Along with this has come the knowledge that bullets need to be purpose related in order to perform the best in different scenarios. IOWs, a bullet good for .357 SD/HD is not the best bullet for hunting deer with the same .357. With today's bullet constructions, folks have a choice......not so much years ago. With today's manufacturing processes there is little difference in a brand name HP or SP than a generic HP or SP other than hype or consistency.
|
August 13, 2014, 12:43 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: Campbell Ca
Posts: 1,090
|
Testing media isn't nearly as controlled as I'd like
And you recovered no bullets. I really don't think you could take too much away from your test.
|
August 13, 2014, 03:10 PM | #22 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
IMHO, a lot of the hype about "bullet performance" is just that, hype. And something for the gunzines to write about. Bullet placement is, and always has been, far more important than bullet expansion, "blow up", etc. Some folks will contend that expanding bullets are necessary, not because they are more lethal or have greater "stopping power" but because they will not overpenetrate. Maybe, but I have never seen a gunzine article on "perfect mushrooms" that mentioned overpenetration - it is always that magic expanding bullet that will for certain stop anything in its tracks, even if it misses.
Jim |
August 13, 2014, 04:19 PM | #23 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 24, 2006
Location: N.E. Oh.
Posts: 527
|
I used to fool around shooting b-get. It was fun & educational. Then I read an article tht plastic gallon jugs of water give similar results so I did the water
jug things. And guess what? Results were very similar. The downside to water jugs is that you can't tell very well where the expaned bullet stopped in the last jug. I've only found a very few j.h.p. bullets that did not expand, most were of foreign make, i.e. PPU .40 cal. When one could find Win. .40 bonded core at Wally per 50 I bought 4 boxes. They perfromed every bit as well at the Buck .25 each rounds. Samo with Remington 230 .45 j.h.p. 100 pack I could buy for $51 bucks per 100 @ Wally back in the old days 2 yrs. ago. They performed just dandy. If you have need for j.h.p. in .45 & .40 & find 'em at Wally grab ;em. They work fine. Nix on PMC .41 mag 210 h.p. They acted just like harball, penetrating SEVEN jugs and might still be flying for all I know! |
August 13, 2014, 04:56 PM | #24 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 6, 2013
Location: Kitsap County, Washington
Posts: 316
|
JHP bullet expansion reliability came into being when the California Highway Patrol and International Wound Ballistics Association jointly developed the four-layer heavy denim test back in the late 1990s. It's a superior test for bullet expansion reliability than the FBI's heavy clothing test. It forced bullet manufacturers to design bullets that expanded more reliably.
Modern bullets designed to perform well against four layers of heavy denim cloth perform very well on the street. Most of these bullets, when recovered from human flesh, closely resemble bullets fired into ordnance gelatin covered by four layers of denim. |
August 13, 2014, 06:18 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
|
I was very surprised by the generic looking ppu hollow points. I thought they were just for show, it looks like they just cut off the top of the bullet and drilled a hole in it, but it mushroomed perfectly in my 9mm and water jugs. I did not more the penetration though, but remember being surprised that it did just as well as the xtp's. Right now I am pretty sold on hornaday flex tips though. I'll upload pics of the rounds in a bit
the top os a federal hydra-shock .38 from a 1.86" barrel(no good), second is a twenty year old half-jacket speer HP in 357mag from same snubbie 3rd is a 9mm 125gr PPU, fourth is the 125gr Hornaday XTP 9mm and last is a 90gr hornaday xtp in 9mm I could definitely see the speer half-jacket possibly getting the shroom cut off by the jacket if it had more velocity, since it has a good jacketed stump left on the bottom, but pretty good in this test
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed Last edited by skizzums; August 13, 2014 at 07:25 PM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|