|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 19, 2002, 02:19 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2002
Location: Meadow Viista, CA
Posts: 6
|
Combat Pistol Shooters Prescription Shooting Glasses
I am currently prototyping and testing new prescription shooting glasses with a special bifocal design for combat/tactical pistol shooters. If you have any personal exerience with custom designs or features , I would like to hear about them.I'm working from several law enforcement inputs and suggestions at this time. When the design is fixed and testing complete, I will be adding them to my product line at Hansen's Eagle Eye.
__________________
Richard Hansen |
February 19, 2002, 06:40 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
IF I COULD SEE YOU
I'D BE LINED UP BEHIND YOU.
(Web-site address?)
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
February 19, 2002, 08:06 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,089
|
Eagle 1, like many competitive shooters with older eyes, I have the standard dominant eye correction at the front sight distance, and the weak eye at infinity. What is magic about your glasses?
|
February 19, 2002, 09:50 PM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2002
Location: Meadow Viista, CA
Posts: 6
|
Combat Shooters Bifocal
My design is only different in that the correction in the dominant eye is a small area along the top rim of the dominant eye lens. The rest of that lens and the other is for distance. Other than that , it sounds like your glasses accomplish the same thing. With mine, when you look around, the bifocal is slightly out of the way and only comes into view with a very slight forward dip of the head straight ahead and forward.
__________________
Richard Hansen |
February 20, 2002, 07:39 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2001
Location: Lafayette, Indiana--American-occupied America
Posts: 5,418
|
Why not just change your technique to move focal point closer?
|
February 20, 2002, 10:03 AM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2002
Location: Meadow Viista, CA
Posts: 6
|
I'm sorry Mr. Freeman, I don't understand what you mean by moving the focal point closer.
__________________
Richard Hansen |
|
|