|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 26, 2012, 11:23 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 1999
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 560
|
14" barrel shotgun that isn't NFA - i.e. no tax stamp required ??
Any thoughts on the legality of this ? (14" barrel Mossberg shotgun)
http://shockwavetechnologies.com/site/?page_id=88 I don't see how this can be legal in any way - I have read all the BATFE letters on the linked site, and still can't see any way this would be OK to own without a tax stamp (BATFE Form 4 or Form 1 if you make it yourself) Seems like the key words that are being relied on for this to be a non tax stamp item are "capable of being concealed on the person". And that is such a fluid term that different people can easily interpret that in different ways. Regards, Rob
__________________
NRA & NAHC Life Member Last edited by Rob62; March 26, 2012 at 11:36 PM. |
March 27, 2012, 01:23 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
|
It makes me nervous. Technically, he seems to be correct. For now. Have a look at Len Savage's letters. But I'm not brave enough to own such a shotgun.
I agree with the point that "capable of being concealed on a person" is readily reinterpreted. Chances are, if the BATFE caught someone with such a shotgun, that's exactly what they would do. It would be very easy for a prosecuting attorney to demonstrate tucking such a shotgun into a jacket in front of a judge in order to demonstrate that such a shotgun is "capable of being concealed". |
March 27, 2012, 06:23 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 9, 2011
Location: colorado-a-fornia
Posts: 111
|
Looks borderline at best, and I would imagine it would take quite alot of talking to stay out of the back of a crusier of you get caught out and about with that one....... Just sayin.....
|
March 27, 2012, 04:36 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,925
|
Quote:
|
|
March 27, 2012, 05:52 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
If they could only make it in semi-auto with a 20 round drum!
|
March 27, 2012, 06:28 PM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Seems easy enough... get him to submit the same S/N that you want to buy to the BATF for a classification and carry the letter with you. THEN read the state statutes for every state you want to posess it in. Good luck on the latter... and state prisons are far less nice places than club fed.
Willie . |
March 27, 2012, 10:28 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 18, 2011
Posts: 116
|
This doesnt seem illegal at all. It is under the same provisions as an AR15 style pistol.
the capable of being concealed is the ATFs definition of AOW(Any other Weapon), which is a weapon that can be concealed, under 26 inches. This weapon is over 26 inches, not being concealable. Also not being considered a shotgun but a Pistol Grip Only Firearm, seems like a fun range gun, and sounds like a pretty good home defense gun. With no cruiser rides involved. |
March 28, 2012, 01:33 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 9, 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 144
|
Ain't a lawyer, but I always thought that all guns with barrels over 0.50 inches were automatically a Destructive Device with shotguns being let through with the "sporting purpose" exemption, and that to be considered a sporting gun it had to adhere to the minimum barrel & overall length rules. That's the reason that you see 410 revolvers, 28 and up are over the half inch.
Not going to lie, if this does bear fruit, I may have to add one of these guns to my "guns that I want even though they are useless". I blame holywood.
__________________
Powered by VI! |
March 28, 2012, 02:55 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
Sounds like more "dancing in the mine field" if you ask me.
|
March 28, 2012, 04:26 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 3,006
|
I don't have the time to look in the ORC but I don't think that crap would fly in Ohio.
I already have some 14" shotguns. I'll take a good old fashioned tax stamp over some wacky loop hole that the ATF can amend with another letter any day!
__________________
"9mm has a very long history of being a pointy little bullet moving quickly" --Sevens |
March 28, 2012, 02:36 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,033
|
Rifled barrels over .5 inches are DDs. This is simply made as a smoothbore pistol, no problems as long as it has never had a buttstock attached and it was not originally manufactured as a shotgun.
This is all federal law. State law may well vary. |
March 28, 2012, 04:29 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: February 8, 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 16
|
H&R Habdygun
I have a H&R handygun its on a 5 dollar any other weapon tax stamp. It was made with a pistol grip and has a smooth bore, if it was made with stock then converted to a pistol grip it would have been subject to a 200 dollar tax stamp. I cant see how this is not an NFA weapon subject to a 5 dollar tax stamp. I also have a Thompson Contender chambered in 45 long colt and .410 its not an NFA weapon because it has a rifled barrel.
|
March 28, 2012, 04:59 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 1999
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 560
|
Thanks for the comments. After reading and re-reading the info at the linked site - of which two of the letters I can't view - I think I understand what the "loophole" is.
My point is that from my purely non BATFE educated mind this is something that will most likely get the owner into a lot of trouble. Regards, Rob
__________________
NRA & NAHC Life Member |
March 28, 2012, 05:08 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,187
|
It falls under the AOW rule. It may be legal with a tax stamp but certainly illegal without one.
|
March 28, 2012, 06:03 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,972
|
No, it's not illegal, and it doesn't require a tax stamp.
|
March 28, 2012, 08:28 PM | #16 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Deleted
Jim |
March 28, 2012, 09:18 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
I don't need one bad enough to take a chance that Andy, Barney, Kojak or Serpico don't know the finer points of BATFE regulations, resulting in my eating pavement. Not interested.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
March 28, 2012, 09:22 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Location: West of the Blue Ridge, VA
Posts: 684
|
Not illegal at all, same as an AR pistol. There is no gray area here
|
March 28, 2012, 09:26 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: March 13, 2012
Location: Circle Pines, MN
Posts: 18
|
I Say Go ahead! I want to see what kind of example they make out of you!
|
March 29, 2012, 01:49 AM | #20 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
|
Quote:
Quote:
The idea is this: Factory pistol grip only shotguns aren't actually shotguns according to the 1934 NFA since they aren't shoulder fired. So, shortening the barrel can't possibly result in an SBS unless you install a stock first. An AOW is defined in part as "capable of being concealed on the person from which a shot can be discharged through the energy of an explosive, a pistol or revolver having a barrel with a smooth bore designed or redesigned to fire a fixed shotgun shell". Note that there is no restriction on barrel length. So, then, at what point would shortening the barrel of a factory PGO shotgun result in it being considered capable of being concealed? In the letters above, the BATFE says capable of being concealed usually means an overall length of less than 26", but that such a firearm over 26" could also be declared an AOW if there was evidence of it being concealed. The point is that this is a completely arbitrary point to make, and that they could reasonably change their mind at any time. And if they do, you are talking a fine up to $10,000 and up to a 10 year sentence. And that's just federal charges. There are still state charges on top of that. The 14" barrel is pretty cool, but I don't know if it's that cool. |
||
March 29, 2012, 04:25 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 3,006
|
O R C 1923.11 F
“Sawed-off firearm” means a shotgun with a barrel less than eighteen inches long, or a rifle with a barrel less than sixteen inches long, or a shotgun or rifle less than twenty-six inches long overall. Yep. Illegal in Ohio. I'll stick to my $200 stamps thankyouverymuch.
__________________
"9mm has a very long history of being a pointy little bullet moving quickly" --Sevens |
March 29, 2012, 08:01 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Location: West of the Blue Ridge, VA
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
|
|
March 29, 2012, 10:20 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 140
|
Tap dancing in the mine field is right I think. While technically correct that it doesn't match description of SBS or AOW, I don't have the funds to defend it in court or cover the expense of being out of work.
Last edited by RyeDaddy; March 29, 2012 at 11:31 AM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|