|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 16, 2010, 10:08 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 2009
Location: Frozen Tundra
Posts: 2,414
|
Its not necessary fo the government to have this power under law. It is in the interest of the agencies and business within the US to disconnect portions of the internet in the event of some major cyber attack, they do not need a law passed in order to do so.
I could see the government setting up some plan with the agencies and business involved, but the legal authority should remain with the people who own the backbone of the internet. Its like your cars on fire but you have to wait for someone else to come to allow you to squirt water out of your garden hose.
__________________
Molon Labe |
June 16, 2010, 10:17 PM | #27 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Frankly, there's some stuff in there that gives me real pause. There are some serious 4th Amendment issues, such as this gem in Section 11: Quote:
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
June 16, 2010, 11:53 PM | #28 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,389
|
This is pure politics, which isn't a part of TFL anymore.
It's also getting far snarkier than it should. Closed.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
|
|