|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 14, 2014, 06:22 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 358
|
So an AR is a good HD but...
I see where others here are saying an AR is really a good round for HD as data shows it doesn't penetrate as much as pistol cartridges thru walls.
I am not debating this AGAIN here but I am curious if anyone has any data or experience shooting an AR indoors. I know that when I am around ARs at the range, I use ear plugs and headphones. The noise is incredible compared to a pistol cartridge or even other rifle cartridges. More specifically, what would that do to yourself and family to discharge one indoors? Would it do permanent hearing damage? My guess is yes and I would avoid this as an option for this very reason when other options are available.
__________________
L2R |
February 14, 2014, 07:42 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,795
|
The debate is usually AR vs shotgun. Both of those are equally loud in the home, and would be a concern. My personal opinion is that a handgun is still the better choice for indoor use even though handgun rounds do typically penetrate more in building material. My thinking is that at such close ranges there is a very real possibility I will need 1 free hand and only 1 hand on the firearm. Plus a handgun is much easier to have handy, yet out of sight for unexpected bumps in the night.
I see the any long gun as a better choice when you are expecting trouble and waiting for intruders from a secure area. Which is better is another debate where I won't go now. |
February 14, 2014, 07:51 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 358
|
i see reports of 140 to 160 decibels
if true, permanent hearing loss would happen.
of course, hearing loss is better than loss of life but this doesn't look like my first choice. hand gun makes sense in some ways but that also puts me on even ground with intruder. decisions, decisions.
__________________
L2R |
February 14, 2014, 08:17 AM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Hearing loss, ARs, defense weapons....
I'm not sure what data you are reading or what media reports you might have seen, but Ive heard the opposite; the AR 5.56mm(5.56x45) 6.8SPC, .300AAC Blackout, 7.62mm, etc do much better than common handgun calibers.
In the 2000s, the big push in US law enforcement was to switch from SMGs & pistol caliber carbines to M4/AR type patrol rifles. New optics, white-lights, stocks, etc all gave these rifles a serious advantage over the SMGs/carbines. As for the noise or muzzle blast, any firearm could cause serious or even permanent hearing loss. Revolvers, pistols, carbines, shotguns, etc. FWIW; the pistol caliber carbines & SMGs(9x19mm .45acp) were considered sub-standard by many commandos in the elite MAC-V-SOG. This spec ops group in SE Asia were able to carry or use nearly any weapon they wanted. Many found the sub-machine guns & pistols lacking in real firepower for the MAC-V-SOG missions. Author & tactics expert: John Plaster who served in the unit documented these pistol caliber problems in his non-fiction books about MAC-V-SOG. |
February 14, 2014, 11:15 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2008
Posts: 560
|
There is a big difference between mac-v-sog work and home defense.
A handgun in a moderate caliber is all a practiced shooter needs. Large diameter subsonic rounds like 45 ACP, 45 Colt, and 44 SPL will do the job with less damage to the shooter. Much of the AR self defense craze is created by video gamers and Tom Clancy fans trying to justify their equipment. I want my handgun and a free hand in that situation. Unlike many people, I have been there. The 1911 was good enough to resolve the problem. On that day John Browning trumped Louisville Slugger. |
February 14, 2014, 11:44 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
All firearms would render hearing useless for awhile, at least.
How about electronic ear muffs? Hearing protection and enhanced hearing, both. Might be quite an advantage in a tactical situation.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
February 14, 2014, 12:02 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,525
|
From FreeHearingTest.com:
.223 from an 18" bbl is 155.5db 9mm from a handgun is 159.8db .357 magnum from a revolver is 164.3db |
February 14, 2014, 12:19 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2012
Location: Richmond, Va.
Posts: 353
|
Not sure if I need to say this, but using a rifle in the home will only be safe if using bullets that will quickly fragment or expand and stop.
Do not use FMJ ammo.
__________________
Frank-- Member, GoA, NRA-ILA, SAF, NRA Life Member |
February 14, 2014, 12:45 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 635
|
Quote:
If you've ever been to a 3 gun match, when someone switches from AR or shotgun to a handgun, the handgun sounds like a toy in comparison.
__________________
SAF, ACLDN, IDPA, handgunlaw.us My AmazonSmile benefits SAF I'd rather be carried by 6 than caged by 12. 2020: It's pronounced twenty twenty. |
|
February 14, 2014, 01:45 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 358
|
i agree
maybe the 'test' measured sound downrange at 100 yards or something.
or maybe without a muzzlebreak. I know that a 9mm is not smart to shoot without hearing protection but it's not totally painful. But standing right behind an AR with a muzzlebreak takes both earplugs and earmuffs. I guess earmuffs on the bedside table would be good and then you have the option if you think you have time.
__________________
L2R Last edited by L2R; February 14, 2014 at 02:52 PM. |
February 14, 2014, 02:07 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,525
|
Here is a chart comparing various AR muzzle devices for sound level one meter away from the muzzle.
Here is another chart comparing the noise levels of different muzzle devices at the shooter's ear. As you can see, the muzzle device makes a big difference. In my limited, unscientific experience, the .357 magnum out of a 4" model 65 is way louder than my AR. |
February 14, 2014, 02:29 PM | #12 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
The noise difference between a handgun and an AR both fired indoors would be "deaf" versus "very deaf". It doesn't really matter how you feel or how bad you think it hurts or whether you "notice", both are far, far above safe dB levels and can and have caused permanent hearing damage in a single shot.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
February 14, 2014, 02:39 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
|
So an AR is a good HD but...
Quote:
Bingo... That's on my AR... No bueno. |
|
February 14, 2014, 02:58 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 358
|
thanks all
that is just what I wanted to know.
So some sort of hearing protection needs to be a part of the discussion when discussing self defense in the home, particularly when advocating 12 gauge and ARs with my friends and family.
__________________
L2R |
February 14, 2014, 03:02 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
|
You mean like earmuffs next to the bed at all times? |
February 14, 2014, 03:34 PM | #16 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Plaster....
John Plaster(USAR, 0-4/Major, ret) wrote at length that handguns & pistol caliber SMGs(Uzi SMGs, Swedish K/S&W model 76s, etc) did not work very well in combat.
I agree that for most purposes a 3"/4" barrel handgun can defend you but it's not perfect. |
February 14, 2014, 03:40 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
|
Quote:
And nothing is perfect. |
|
February 14, 2014, 08:30 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 610
|
Well that's what suppressors were made for. Just wish they were simply sold as "safety equipment" right next to the ear plugs and glasses, instead of demonized as some "assassin tools"
|
February 14, 2014, 10:17 PM | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2013
Posts: 1
|
As far as hearing loss is concerned, how do our combat veterans fare? I ask this seriously. It seems a firefight would be louder than a single weapon discharge.
|
February 14, 2014, 10:34 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 988
|
I messed up the quote
Quote:
__________________
Semper Fi Marine, NRA member, SAF Defender's Club member, and constitutionally protected keeper and bearer of firearms Last edited by SHE3PDOG; February 16, 2014 at 01:58 AM. |
|
February 15, 2014, 09:52 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 610
|
As I understand, most simply don't use hearing protection because they can't hear commands or other important things.
Tinnitus is a serious problem among combat vets. |
February 15, 2014, 10:04 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2012
Location: Richmond, Va.
Posts: 353
|
Quote:
I can attest to that. My ears are ringing so loud right now, and 24/7 if you want the truth of it, that it's even hard to read this.
__________________
Frank-- Member, GoA, NRA-ILA, SAF, NRA Life Member |
|
February 15, 2014, 10:25 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 988
|
Ya, my ears ring too. It kind of sounds like the low buzz when a TV is turned on.
__________________
Semper Fi Marine, NRA member, SAF Defender's Club member, and constitutionally protected keeper and bearer of firearms |
February 16, 2014, 01:44 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Rocky Mountain West
Posts: 3,395
|
If I have opened fire in my home, I am afraid for my life. I could not care less at that point about the hearing loss, I just want to be alive at the end of the encounter, with the immediate threat stopped. The hearing damage will be a bummer later, but I really don't think noise should be a factor in choosing the HD weapon for you. It's sorta like if I had to total my car to avoid a fatal accident, or cut off my trapped hand before it falls off a cliff. Those situations are going to be real bummers, but I'll be alive at the end.
I don't mean to minimize the seriousness of major hearing damage. I'm sure it's a real burden. I just don't think it factors into a use of lethal force to preserve life and limb. At the range, by all means, I'm all about high-end hearing protection.
__________________
16 Pistols, 5 Rifles, 1 Shotgun, no time to shoot them |
February 16, 2014, 07:19 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 358
|
obvious choice life over hearing
I agree 100%.
But if I plan well, why can't I have both? While your point is spot on, my thread was started due in part to my partial loss of hearing already in my life. It got me thinking about my Dad whose hearing loss greatly contributed to him ending up in a nursing home. There were other issues but the environment that he created, screaming, chronic asking to repeat words, blasting the tv all day long played a major roll in him losing his independence. So, while my hearing may not rank #1 in the heat of the moment, I realize that my hearing is like using up a tube of toothpaste and mine is already half squeezed out. I am weighing out the idea of a suppressor vs. having hearing protection hanging next to the bed that could both protect and even enhance my hearing. Having 2 dogs probably buys me time. And if I don't have time, well then, so be it. I won't just ignore the facts and end up like my Dad without trying.
__________________
L2R |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|