|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 19, 2007, 11:55 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: September 19, 2007
Location: Southern California...
Posts: 28
|
Don't feel too bad, that is a normal reaction. I've had a gun pointed at me before with the will to shoot (I believe) and my reaction was compete shock. I froze up and did exactly what I was told. I wasn't hurt and lost a little, it took me at least day to get over what had happened. That was years a ago but it's affected my life ever since.
|
October 19, 2007, 01:15 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2001
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 1,521
|
I am with others in questioning whether he really "froze," at all. To me that implies inaction when action is required. By his own telling, he never saw the weapon being presented - he merely observed the attacker straighten up and then "fall back away from the vehicle" - and then only later understood that the assailant had been shot by the driver.
Sounds like OP acted quite appropriately, given his knowledge of events. And it sounds like nothing he discerned after the fact would have changed his behavior one iota.
__________________
"...A humble and contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise." Ps. li "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." —Frederic Bastiat |
October 19, 2007, 01:40 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 560
|
It seems to be passed up, but someone mentioned time compression. Maybe what he experienced was that. What felt like a minute was really less then a second, there is evidence that your perception of time is distorted in a sd situation.
I have only been in one situation where i had to draw my weapon for fear of my well being. I do a side job at night as a rural newpaper delivery guy, not flashy but it helps with bills and such. I was at a very isolated area of my route and was about to put a paper in the box, when out of the corner of my eye, i saw something move, It was black and brown and looked to be rougly the size of a medium sized rott.(cant spell the full name, you know which dog im talking about) It was charging at me, and growling and carrying on. Now im seated in my car, but it is in park. My first reaction was to draw my g17 as fast as i could and get it on this dog. I even managed to get my sights lined up.(i remember trying repeating to my self to get the sights lined up) Im not sure how long it was between the time when i first noticed the dog to the time that i drew and lined up the sights but it felt like at least a minute. But in reality i bet it was more like less then a few seconds. Now I bet your wondering if i shot that dog, well i didnt. That dog did something strange, when i got the gun leveled at its head, it stopped in its tracks. It just stood there, I Kept my gun on him, but put the paper in the box and drove off. The damn thing then started chasing the car down the road and after a half mile gave up. Now the time from when i saw it out of the corner of my eye, to the time right up to the moment of the draw, felt like a bout a min, but i dont think it was. What i found interesting, was that the time it took me to draw my gun and get the sights lined up, felt really really fast. Faster then anything i have ever been able to do in practice. I drew so fast that i broke the retention on my bianchi accumold. It has a button your thinger hits during the draw stroke. I managed to draw through that. I dont know if my draw was realy realy fast, or if it infact was a nother byproduct of time compression, i guess ill never beable to find out not til it happens again. |
October 19, 2007, 03:23 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2007
Posts: 1,041
|
That reminds me of a time I was fishing and a water moccasin came swimming up to the boat and started to get in. I flipped ham back wit a paddle and he came back trying to get in. I flipped him back again and he came swilling back a third time. I reached in and pulled out my 357 and pointed it directly at the snake. I swear the snake looked at it and dove under water never to be seen again. May have been coincidence but it was funny as heck.
|
October 19, 2007, 04:29 PM | #30 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Posts: 1,919
|
thanks, i needed that!
many thanks to all who replied and their kind words.
also thanks for the links, very helpful. just to tie it all up; i never felt threatened by the shooter. i would heve felt more threatened by the other guy if i was in the shooters situation. the "victim" lived, thru and thru left chest with hemothorax. the family of the "victim" already has an attorney making motions. please dont harass me about the term "victim" i think he got what he deserved. thanks again for all the help. ill post now and then to keep you all updated. tom |
October 19, 2007, 04:29 PM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: October 8, 2007
Location: Central Illinois - Cornfields & Cows
Posts: 88
|
I agree with others that from what you have posted, you didn't feel threatened and your actions were therefore understandable considering what you were witnessing. I wouldn't beat myself up if I were you. Critique the situation and determine if there is anything you did or did not do that you would change if confronted with similar scenario in the future. You might decide that what you did was the right answer.
__________________
"Don't Tread On Me." |
October 19, 2007, 05:13 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 20, 2007
Posts: 1,283
|
Quote:
just didnt think it was a very fitting description. it actually confused me a little at first and i had to...re-read. |
|
October 19, 2007, 07:25 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2005
Posts: 335
|
You really should be easy on yourself. You just had a root canal and there is no way you were expecting trouble. What would you have done differently? By the way guys, does this qualify as a 1 shot stop? If so, +1 to the .40
|
October 20, 2007, 04:14 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2006
Location: San Diego, Calif.
Posts: 717
|
Evan1293
Thank you so much for posting that Boyd OODA link! It has totally changed how I think about combat situations!!!!!
|
October 20, 2007, 07:12 PM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: April 2, 2006
Posts: 34
|
Do more scenario work and mental blue printing in your training. Actually pitcture scenarious, visualize yourself taking the preferred response. When it happens for real the mind has a stored reaction to refer to. You get beond the "this can't be happening" stage faster, and into action.
Of course the fact that you just had a root canal may have screwed you up a tad. |
October 20, 2007, 10:02 PM | #36 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Posts: 1,919
|
+1 for the .40
Hey porkskin,
Wanna start a threat re stopping power of .40 vs 9mm vs 45? |
October 21, 2007, 01:42 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2005
Posts: 335
|
I'm not going anywhere near that 9<40<45...my carry guns are all Connecticut or Massuchusets made .38's and one swiss .380. I just thought this qualifies as a one shot stop with the story presented. If you ever watch "First 48" on A&E, it is amazing the folks that die with mousegun wounds
|
October 21, 2007, 02:17 PM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2005
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
|
|
October 21, 2007, 02:29 PM | #39 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Posts: 1,919
|
Doesn't sound like the "shooter" was the criminal here
definately not the criminal. i only chose the terms "shooter" and "victim" for ease of description. guess i could've used "guy number1" and "guy number 2" instead, but inevidently some would would ask "which one was guy #1?"
|
October 22, 2007, 12:59 PM | #40 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
October 22, 2007, 01:02 PM | #41 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
.380? I'm torn between my tomcat in .22 and my keltec in .32. I like the tomcat better and shoot better with it, but not much better and the .32 does seem like a lot more firepower than the .22, in my world a .380 might just be overkill.
|
October 22, 2007, 07:33 PM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2005
Posts: 335
|
David, I let you slide on another thread as you seemed more knowledgable, however I have personally never missed a "First 48", and can tell you that barring a .50 Desert Eagle, a Glock 30, and a few rifles, every murder on that show is a .380, a .25, or a .22. Do you watch the show? I am right on this pal.
|
October 22, 2007, 11:22 PM | #43 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
October 23, 2007, 08:43 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2005
Posts: 335
|
I see that now. My bad
|
October 23, 2007, 06:42 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2001
Location: North Central Florida & Miami
Posts: 3,208
|
Fact is, that these things usually happen in an instant. The attacker knows what will happen, you don't have a clue until it does. Maybe, just maybe, you will have a second or two to react.
All those guys worring about lawyers and juries, about law suits and consequences, wind up dead. The folks that practice, have their mind set in place, and have trained themselves to react, survive.
__________________
Nemo Me Impune Lacesset "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.".........Ronald Reagan |
October 24, 2007, 03:44 PM | #46 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
October 28, 2007, 02:10 AM | #47 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2007
Posts: 6
|
Definitely expect to be subpoenaed and deposed. You might be the only thing keeping the shooter out of jail.
|
October 28, 2007, 05:36 AM | #48 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
TP,
I think you're being too hard on yourself. Quote:
When Driver #1 starts beating on horn-honking driver #2, your logical processor starts looking for a plausible reason and/or is trying to determine "which of these two turkeys is in the wrong here?" Emotionally, your internal thoughts are "I just wanna go home, don't make me get involved in your stupidity, guys!" Quote:
Opinion: 1. You did nothing wrong. 2. There was probably nothing you could have done to change the outcome. 3. You were not directly threatened, thus no reason to draw. 4. You have just discovered that events are seldom clear-cut as to who the good & bad guys are or what the fight is all about. 5. Events can happen before we're finished making up our minds what is really happening or who the real aggressor is. By the way, I do urge you to write down your observations before being called for a deposition or as a witness. Recall as many factual details as you can and try to get the sequence of events straight. Then critically examine anything where you make a presumption - such as that Driver #2 shot Driver #1 -- if you didn't hear a gunshot you don't know for sure. All you know is that Driver #2 exited his car holding a polymer-looking gun and later examination revealed Driver #1 had been shot. Likewise, unless you saw fists making contact or Driver #2 reacting to punches, all you can say is that it appeared to you as though driver #1 was punching driver #2. Having it written down now and stored in your desk will allow you to refresh your memory when/if called as a witness. It also allows you to refrain from "filling in the gaps" with presumptions as time goes by.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
||
October 28, 2007, 11:01 AM | #49 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,829
|
Don't knock yourself for it. What anyone can do is to close their OOLA loop. Preplan your response to situations and when it arises, you already know how to react.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
October 28, 2007, 12:21 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2007
Posts: 115
|
You did the right thing. He had the right to protect himself just as you do (In Utah at least you don't have to take a beating). To draw down on a victim who was protecting himself might have gotten you or him killed (an ugly situation either way). I know if I just took a beating and shot someone, then a nearby person draws down on me , I would have shot first and asked questions later.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|