|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 26, 2013, 08:14 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2012
Posts: 8
|
Mandatory Firearm Insurance
Looks like they're trying to find ways to financially penalize firearm owners & claim it doesn't infringe.
http://www.ctnow.com/news/connecticu...,7225063.story |
January 26, 2013, 08:23 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 18, 2012
Posts: 389
|
Thinly veiled obstacle to ownership.
I think it also reveals the anti-gun attitude, viewpoint and ideology. If my car gets stolen and used in a bank robbery I'm not liable for it. But the antis think that if someone's gun gets stolen there should be someone to sue. What is the legal principle behind this? Another way to punish gun owners, just one month at a time - not all at once. |
January 26, 2013, 11:35 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: June 12, 2010
Location: Alaska
Posts: 42
|
Counter
Criminals don't pay insurance (look at cars) they will be entirely UN INSURED hence, everybody will have to carry Un/under insured gun owners insurance, I'm sure it can be added as a rider to your standard health insurance see, my idea is to spread it ALL around, mind you it's pointless (drownings and all are higher, but hey, we all pay for flood insurance) |
|
|