The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 3, 2002, 07:19 AM   #1
Khornet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 585
.40 S&W brass

Came back from the range with my scrounging booty: 533 .40 cases all in good shape. After sizing/depriming I began case belling, which I do very lightly with these cases. With my RCBS die I can usually feel the case rub the die walls as it enters (this is not the case with my RCBS .45 dies). I'm using a Rock Chucker single-stage.

As I went through the brass I noticed that every so often a case would feel tight in the die, and I began noting the headstamp when that happened and setting the case aside.

Reading on TFL so often about disasters with .40 reloads from case failure, especially in 'unsupported' chambers like my G22, I've been getting more finicky about my brass and discarding anything that seems odd.

Of 533 cases, 494 were Winchester, the remainder divided among headstamps FC, PMC, S&B, Federal, CBC, Speer, and RP.

44 cases were 'tight'. Most, 55% were FC; 11% each were Win. and Fed., 9% S&B, 7% RP, 2% each of the others.

Now I don't know how FC brass differs from the others--maybe you folks can tell me--but I've never had a problem with my Glock or any of the hundreds of reloads using Win. brass. But I don't intend to use these 'tight' cases. I sure don't need 'em, I have about 1500 Win. and why take a chance?

Anybody know anything about these other brass makes?
__________________
The M1 does MY talking!
Khornet is offline  
Old April 3, 2002, 08:52 AM   #2
sricciardelli
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 13, 2001
Location: Montana
Posts: 489
I'll assume you did a full-length resizing first?

Measure the wall thickness of a case that is not "tight" and then one that is...
__________________
http://stevespages.com/page8.htm
sricciardelli is offline  
Old April 3, 2002, 08:03 PM   #3
Cheapo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 1998
Posts: 986
I've measured several brands of .40 brass after sectioning them, and found all but one or two were exactly the same thickness in the neck. The others were a whopping .001" thinner.

There's little difference I've seen in other dimentions as well--certainly not enough to make me suspect sidewall thickness differences as a real factor in .40 kB!s.

Now alloy content, work-hardening, metal fatigue and perhaps even clowns using Brasso as case cleaner--THOSE could be factors in the .40 problem. Yours could merely have been fired in a looser chamber.
__________________
Let us never forget that the only legitimate source of government power is the citizens. If WE cannot exercise a certain power, we cannot grant it to the state.
Cheapo is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04251 seconds with 10 queries