|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 7, 2013, 11:01 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2007
Location: "Undisclosed Bunker"
Posts: 1,464
|
Taurus Acquires Diamondback Firearms
I was kind of sad to see this in that while I don't own a Diamonback I have shot a few of them with buddies at the range and they seemed like a nice utilitarian-like model. That said, sign of the times in that there are more and more consolidations occurring in the corporate world from what I can tell:
http://cheaperthandirt.com/blog/?p=35774
__________________
NRA Life Member “A free people ought...to be armed..." ―George Washington |
January 7, 2013, 09:07 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 29, 2012
Posts: 10
|
Taurus? Seriously? Are they announcing this to promote their guns or damn themselves to eternal hell? I wouldn't take a Taurus firearm if it was free.
|
January 7, 2013, 11:42 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: December 4, 2012
Posts: 47
|
They can now each have a POS convention.
|
January 8, 2013, 12:48 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: November 30, 2006
Posts: 22
|
Every Taurus product I have owned has been flawless. I currently own 3. I can't say that about all the others. This condemnation trick is ignorant and wreaks of " my gun is better than your gun" syndrome. Now Diamonbback I have no experience with and do not plan to.
__________________
Keep the Faith |
January 8, 2013, 01:00 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
I've owned a Taurus and it was a decent gun. YMMV.
If they bought Diamondback I hope they can make the design work. The only two I saw at a range were jam-o-matics.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
|
|