|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 2, 2009, 08:39 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: November 22, 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 61
|
.40 S&W Caliber Cartridge not Accurate?
I was reading in Guns magazine today (January Issue) about the 20th anniversary of the .40 S&W caliber cartridge and in the article it was stated:
"Though not the most accurate pistol cartridge out there, the .40 S&W has more than enough accuracy for it's purpose." My question is this, why was such a statement made? Is it really less accurate than let's say a 9mm or a .45 ACP? |
December 2, 2009, 09:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 144
|
Sounds like a duboius claim to me. I know several people who shoot it better than any other caliber, and I have never seen any hard data to suggest it is less accurate than any other handgun caliber. Maybe they are comparing it to rifle rounds...
__________________
Sig Mosquito Sig P228 Bersa Thunder 380 Last edited by jontz; December 3, 2009 at 06:59 AM. |
December 2, 2009, 10:02 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2009
Posts: 440
|
Agreed, definitely a dubious claim. I don't think it holds any merit, the .40 S&W is a great handgun round.
__________________
A liberal firearms owner and 2A supporter from New Jersey (yes, we do exist). SIG Sauer P6, S&W Model 59, Ruger Mark II "NRA Endowment" special edition, Mossberg 500 12-gauge. Please check out WhichGun.com, a firearms reference and buying guide. |
December 2, 2009, 10:12 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Posts: 398
|
I call B.S. I've never seen any informed research that says the .40 S&W is inherently less accurate than any other self defense caliber.
|
December 2, 2009, 10:19 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2009
Posts: 360
|
My 40 SW Sig 226 is a very accurate handgun and shoots equally as well as my 9mm Sig P226.
|
December 2, 2009, 10:21 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 5, 2009
Posts: 559
|
In most cases involving modern ammunition, it's the firearm or the shooter that isn't accurate, not the cartridge. This assumes quality ammunition, of course.
|
December 2, 2009, 10:59 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 1, 2001
Posts: 10,223
|
I dont usually shoot a lot of .40, but in the same guns, SIG P226's and P229's, with extra factory .40 barrels, I shoot tighter groups with the 357SIG barrels in the guns than I do with the .40 barrels in the guns.
Its the same for all of them too, not just one gun. |
December 2, 2009, 11:27 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
|
Here's a group that I shot, off hand with an HK USPc in .40S&W at 25 feet using UMC 180 grain practice ammo. I haven't benched the pistol, but with the right ammo I bet it would do pretty well.
[IMG][/IMG] |
December 2, 2009, 11:36 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
|
I've got a Glock 23 which apparently didn't get the memo. Discounting shots that I toss, it'll hang right at 2 3/4" at 50 yards (rested)- even with my bulk reloads.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice. |
December 3, 2009, 12:10 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
|
Quote:
|
|
December 3, 2009, 04:06 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
|
The 40 does seem to have some disadvantages.
It's almost always loaded supersonic. A lot of the loads that work best for personal defense, 155gr or esp. the 135gr don't have a lot of bearing surface (meaning "part of the bullet that actually rubs on the barrel"). A longer bearing surface increases accuracy. And since the cartridge is kinda short for it's length, if the chamber is a bit loose it will allow more "wobble" meaning the bullet doesn't start out pointed quite the same place downrange each shot. BUT, a tighter chamber can compensate for that, and the heavier weight slugs have both more bearing surface and some of the 180s are subsonic, which helps too. They're not highly thought of in IPSC circles. They're almost always plenty accurate for personal defense.
__________________
Jim March |
December 3, 2009, 05:52 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 228
|
there were serious accuracy problems that initially delayed the 40s&w (it's original name) from reaching the market.
s&w could not get less than 3 foot shot groups with it at 25 yards. of course s&w and winchester resolved the issues. maybe the current rumors are leftover from the dawn of the 40cal? initial offerings in the caliber weren't as accurate as 9 or 45. it's still not quite accurate as 45acp or 9mm in a lot of guns. yet other guns shoot it exceptionally well. seems to be a very brand(of pistol) picky cartridge |
December 3, 2009, 07:07 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 144
|
Quote:
__________________
Sig Mosquito Sig P228 Bersa Thunder 380 |
|
December 3, 2009, 08:24 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
|
Smoothbore BB pistols will beat '3 foot at 25 yards'. I don't buy it.
I have also obtained excellent accuracy with OEM Glock .40 chambers measuring 0.433 at the chamber mouth, so large chambers are necessarily accuracy destroyers either.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice. |
December 3, 2009, 08:37 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 29, 1998
Location: mid-coast Maine
Posts: 546
|
"not highly thought of in IPSC circles" ? Limited division is shot almost exclusively with .40's. Yes, capacity is the issue, but I don't hear anyone complaining about the accuracy.
|
December 3, 2009, 09:07 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 638
|
Obviously the article was written by one of those slimy S&W haters. You know... The ones that typically refer to the cartridge as .40 Short & Wimpy.
__________________
"...shall not be infringed." (Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states). |
December 3, 2009, 09:17 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
|
Have the bullseye shooters discovered the .40 S&W yet? John
From another board, posted in 2006: "IF .40 S&W were more accurate at 50 yards than .45 ACP bullseye match shooters would be all over it for the "centerfire" leg of 2700 matches. They aren't, so its pretty safe bet that it isn't. --wally." |
December 3, 2009, 10:17 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2008
Posts: 3,004
|
Ive seen some impressive groups shot with .40s. Its accurate. Im not a .40 fan but saying its inaccurate is a stupid claim.
__________________
Check us out: www.imfdb.org. Fun site for people who love gun movies. |
December 3, 2009, 10:36 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2005
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 683
|
Quote:
__________________
Join the community at GunUp! |
|
December 3, 2009, 01:04 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2007
Location: Moses Lake WA
Posts: 395
|
The Glock 22 was the most accurate Glock that I owned (with WWB 180gr) it would out group a 17 and 21 at 25 yd of of sand bags usually 1.5" five shot groups. I currently have a Kahr K40 that shoots very good also. The heavy bullets seem to work better for me. I like the 40 but don't think it is any better or worse than a 9mm or 45 acp any one will work for me.
__________________
The best gun is the one you have when you really need one |
December 3, 2009, 03:24 PM | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2008
Posts: 3
|
Just Bought an HK 40c
I have shot just about everything except the .40 and the 10mm. I recently purchased an HK 40c and plan to take it to the range in the next few weeks to see how it does. However, I will say that I find Sig 9mm (239) to be more accurate than my Glock-19, so I tend to think its more about the gun, grip and trigger control and less about the ammo...
|
December 3, 2009, 05:24 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: SW FLORIDA
Posts: 318
|
The majority of PD's in America, as well as the majority of Federal agencies use the .40 cal. It is a powerful and accurate round. I've owned a Glock 22for the last 16 years. I also have a .40 cal FNP and Beretta. It will get the job done.
|
December 3, 2009, 05:37 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 884
|
If not .40 then which?
Some of you have said that .40 S&W is, "pretty accurate for self defense". That seems to give the impression that you think another pistol cartridge is more accurate. So...
Without starting a huge malicious debate, which pistol round is most accurate? You may want to list a few of them in the order you like. And if you think's it's .40 S&W please say so. (I know some depends on brand of gun and brand of ammunition. I just want other people's opinion.)
__________________
Slow is Smooth. Smooth is Fast. |
December 3, 2009, 05:42 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 811
|
"Without starting a huge malicious debate,....." you say
Too Late.........
.22 I say.
__________________
sailing ... A way to spend lots of money and go real S L O W |
December 3, 2009, 05:59 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
Depends on what you mean by "accuracy". For off hand shooting out to 25 yds there seems to be more difference in accuracy between ammo brands/models than cartridges such as 9mm, .40 and .45ACP. Also, the .38 and .45ACP have nearly 100 yds of evolution in firearms which most of includes bullseye competition.
The .40 was designed specifically to meet combat criteria not bullseye competition standards, and the firearms for it have been primarily intended for LEO and defense. Maybe in a hundred years some .40 pistols will evolve to be tuned for better target accuracy. But right now the competitions it is used for favor reliable functioning, capacity and speed over pinpoint accuracy. The transonic velocities of lighter bullets can also be a factor not experienced in all but the most extreme .45ACP (such as 165 gr). I suspect a 180 gr .40 is just as inherently accurate as a 230 gr .45ACp or 147 gr 9mm all of which have similar sectional densities (therefore approximately the same bearing length) and velocities. I think the accuracy issue has more to do with the ammo type and firearm used than the cartridge when it cmes to the popular auto pistols. for instance, the .380ACP is not known as being inherently accurate. Light, stubby bullets. But, when fired in a fixed barrel blowback pistol like the Makarov it can easily be more accurate than 99% of recoil operated pistols.
__________________
"The ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone. ... The advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition." - James Madison
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|