|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 8, 2009, 12:44 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 26, 2008
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 191
|
"I'd rather be caught with it than caught without it."
I realize that this is going to be a can of worms. I'll post it anyways.
So, I have a buddy who lives in a really bad neighborhood. He is not eligible for a CCP where he lives (due to stuff that he was semi-involved with 12 or so years ago). He also carries a concealed pistol and has for many years. He is a decent family man and a good guy (for the sake of this post it would be nice if you could just trust me on this but it's not neccessary I suppose) and he has never got into any trouble over the gun although he told me he has had to draw it at least 10 times. At least twice was in his home. I don't know if he can own no pistols or just not get a CCP. Anyways, I don't really have a question I just was wondering what to make of this and would like to hear some opinions on it. I guess one question would be what can I say to make him even consider the consequences of carrying illegally? By the way, the title of this post is what he says is an unoffical motto of sorts where he lives. EDIT: This question is most likely out of line... If it was you, If tommorow your permit got revoked would you stop carrying if you felt you where in danger? By revoked, I mean possibly for getting into a bar fight and having a bad lawyer or something along those lines. This is incidentally NOT the case with my friend. I don't expect anyone to put an answer ti this out there on the internet. Just something to think about I guess. Thanks, Dan
__________________
When I came back to Dublin I was courtmartialed in my absence and sentenced to death in my absence, so I said they could shoot me in my absence. - Brendan Behan Last edited by danweasel; January 8, 2009 at 12:48 AM. Reason: added the last part. |
January 8, 2009, 01:20 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: gulf of mexico
Posts: 2,716
|
better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
i WILL do WHATEVER it takes to protect myself/family.
__________________
There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." |
January 8, 2009, 01:39 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Location: Bismark
Posts: 332
|
Hmm, I'd probably go with no... I know your family is the biggest priority but you're not gonna do your kids any good in jail/prison, (yes i know that not having a gun could potentially eliminate that issue but...) there are other non lethal alternatives (yes i know they suck, but you'll be legal and it'll drastically increase your survival for MOST situations) So i'd say, Screw the felony.... Swallow your pride and buy a Kick-ass Tazer gun that has some range on it. (Assuming that's not illegal too)
Just my 2 cents. But then again i'm not married, I have no kids, and I am totally allowed to have a CPL so i can't say for sure. I don't want to sound like a dandy but if it was my friend i'd tell him that i care about him and don't want him to go to the hot house, and i'd encourage him to check his options. |
January 8, 2009, 02:08 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: December 18, 2008
Location: accurativille
Posts: 44
|
Well, it is our right to bear arms peroid. That was before the ATF and state laws requiring Conceal Pistol License. All the RED tape is for the birds and we have to abide by it while criminals don't and if cought the criminal gets a slap on the hand, and trust me the BG will still carry.
So bottom line CARRY IT and screw the RED tape reverse protection. If you had to pull it out then you must carry it. I would only pull it for one reason and that is to put someone down and i don't shoot legs and arms.
__________________
This is my rifle there are many like it but this one is MINE! |
January 8, 2009, 02:36 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,123
|
Dan you are talking interior Alaska at this time of year?
Get the man a squirt gun. Super Soaker for the home, something smaller for CC. A couple of shots of H20 to the eyes, -50 F first blink eyelids/lashes stuck together, BG is effectively blinded. That will get him by until break up, and then it's a whole nother ball of wax! Good Luck! I can understand your concern. Didn't realize that Fairbanks was that dangerous!
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... |
January 8, 2009, 02:53 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 16, 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,891
|
AZAK, thats life on the streets in Juno... kill or be killed, lol.
Seriously though, I have to agree with JESUS. I mean I literally HAVE to agree with him because he's JESUS. I see his point. On the other hand, this guy has been in 10 situations that already required him to pull his gun, and he's still around to tell about it. If it was me in his shoes, I wouldnt carry A gun... I'd be carrying TWO. For better or worse, I'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it. |
January 8, 2009, 07:14 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
some penalties and the crimes/charges associated with gun violations are more severe with a permit than they are without.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
January 8, 2009, 08:45 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
Honestly, if what you presented here is all you know, I'm not sure you know *enough* about the situation to give him any sort of counsel. But from what you did describe, it certainly sounds like your buddy figures he's already got his own situation all worked out and that he's not likely to do anything differently. I'd suggest that the best thing for you to do might just be to keep your mouth shut.
|
January 8, 2009, 08:58 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: June 14, 2006
Posts: 81
|
You could tell him that he won't be able to protect his family from a prison cell. In response to your second question, I would not carry if my permit was revoked for some reason.
__________________
Para Ordinance SSP-SS Springfield Armory XD .40 |
January 8, 2009, 10:02 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2005
Posts: 3,733
|
Not being eligible to Conceal Carry is very different in many places from not being allowed to own.
1. Having to draw 10 times in recent memory as a civilian means one should be more aware of their surroundings and practice avoidance much better. 2. If he can own there is no reason he cannot defend his family in his home. 3. You have no RIGHT to carry. You think you do but the SCOTUS does not and their answer goes with regards to the COTUS no matter how we feel on the matter. The law is clear on the matter and your refusing to acknowledge the facts of the matter are irrelevant. 4. How well will he be able to protect his family from a jail cell? 5. The odds of having the weapon be found are far greater than having to use it. Car Accident, Heart Attack, Flashing in front of the wrong people, telling people you carry illegally who then post it on the internet or tell others or sell the information to get themselves out of deeper personal trouble to them... All of these mean the odds of being found out are far greater than really needing it if you behave accordingly. If found out then refer back to point 4.
__________________
"Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson "The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin |
January 8, 2009, 10:21 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
What's the penalty there for concealed weapon w/o a license? In Minnesota, it's just a gross misdemeanor. That'll mess up your life if caught and convicted, but not permanently like a felony.
(I thought Alaska didn't require a permit -- almost like Vermont)
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
January 8, 2009, 10:31 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: July 26, 2008
Posts: 36
|
Does your friend live in AK, and if so why would he need a CCP? If not, ignore my post.
|
January 8, 2009, 10:32 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: June 14, 2006
Posts: 81
|
My train of thought was that since Alaska doesn't require a license to conceal, that what we were actually talking about was that he isn't eligible to own a firearm.
Did I read too much into it?
__________________
Para Ordinance SSP-SS Springfield Armory XD .40 |
January 8, 2009, 10:33 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2008
Location: Fayettenam
Posts: 1,086
|
Dan is he in Alaska? If so:
Quote:
But to answer your question.........Yes
__________________
The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. |
|
January 8, 2009, 10:56 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: December 2, 2008
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 17
|
I generally concur with Musketeer. I live in the People's Democratic Republic of Illinois, and apparently exist outside the protection of this Second Amendment thing I hear so much about from citizens of the United States , so I have no personal frame of reference on CC. If he is breaking the law by carrying, then that choice is personal, and he must weigh the consequences of that decision. Does he carry, potentially needing it to defend life/family and risking jail, or does he not carry? If I'm in urban Detroit or East St. Louis, I might risk the chance. If I'm in suburban Illinois, I might not.
He has other options: if he is legally able to own, but not carry, he might be able to transport legally in his vehicle and carry a Taser on his person. Any deterrence is better than none. It might be much slower for him to retrieve from a vehicle and engage in a SHTF scenario, but the likelihood of him needing that firearm is lower than the possibility of him getting a stay in the hoosegow for illegally carrying. I appreciate the sentiment of "Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6", but the odds of one are greater than the other. No option is perfect in this case, and discretion is typically the deciding factor. YMMV. I'm not a legal eagle.
__________________
Peace through Strength. Last edited by Flyover Country; January 8, 2009 at 10:59 AM. Reason: Clarification |
January 8, 2009, 11:02 AM | #16 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
If he has "had to" pull his gun 10 times, he is one of the following:
1) A bad judge of when he needs to pull a gun 2) NOT a decent family man and hanging in places he shouldn't, most likely for reasons he shouldn't 3) Terribly ignorant and unaware. His ignorance takes him to places he shouldn't be and his lack of awareness keeps him from avoiding bad situations in those places.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
January 8, 2009, 05:36 PM | #17 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 23, 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 411
|
Quote:
just because he is willing to protect himself unlike you does NOT make him a bad person. |
|
January 8, 2009, 05:39 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: Weekend cowboy
Posts: 542
|
Just like:
It's better to have one and not need it, than needing it and not having one. Period. |
January 8, 2009, 06:08 PM | #19 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
WilddontgetmestartedAlaska ™ |
|
January 8, 2009, 06:28 PM | #20 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Posts: 707
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have this strange prejudice against felons |
||
January 8, 2009, 06:39 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 9, 2006
Posts: 666
|
While i wont advocate breaking this law , I do understand the described fella's choice , and ill note that if your already a felon of any sort there is little incentive for you not to carry and protect yourself or your family . If i liked the fella he would stay my friend .... but i sure would not sell him a pistol lol .
|
January 8, 2009, 07:44 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 19, 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 250
|
The law is the law, and your buddy is breaking it. Like you, I don't know if your friend is legally allowed to even possess a handgun, but he certainly shouldn't be carrying concealed.
You do realize that people who break gun laws are the ones who provoke more strict ones! |
January 8, 2009, 07:57 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 286
|
Quote:
__________________
Luck runs out. Boiler Up! |
|
January 8, 2009, 08:02 PM | #24 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Quote:
WildimnotantigunimantifelonAlaska ™ |
|
January 8, 2009, 08:10 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 15, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 286
|
Quote:
BuckauthoritariansneedtomovetochinaoranothercommunistcountrycanyoureadthisprobablynotsinceitsallbunchedtogetherwhatsthepointofthisHammer
__________________
Luck runs out. Boiler Up! Last edited by BuckHammer; January 8, 2009 at 08:31 PM. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|