The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Competition Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 10, 2012, 01:54 AM   #1
smenkhare
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2007
Location: Sydney, Aus
Posts: 149
9mm ammunition for competition

I've finally sent away for my pistol license and am looking at IPSC production division. Other than hand loads, what ammunition do you reccomend?
smenkhare is offline  
Old October 10, 2012, 06:11 AM   #2
lmccrock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2007
Location: Red Rock. TX
Posts: 820
I would say Atlanta Arms because they make a Production-specific load, but noting your location, it is probably not available.

You may have to experiment to find a feel you like. I like heavy-for-caliber bullets loaded with small amounts of fast powder. More of a push, less snap. But others want snappy because they believe it runs faster and that means lighter bullets and more, slower powder.

Just be sure to get a gun on the approved list, IPSC Production List.
lmccrock is offline  
Old October 10, 2012, 06:39 AM   #3
smenkhare
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2007
Location: Sydney, Aus
Posts: 149
Hey lmccrock
yeah I'm looking at either the glock 17A or the springfield XD (unfortunately no G34)
and thanks for the suggestion
smenkhare is offline  
Old October 10, 2012, 07:26 AM   #4
zincwarrior
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
What about the standard manufacturer loads: Winchester, Remington, Federal. How do they compare etc. for competition? Its interesting, as I've heard a lot about mediocre or "range ammunition," but little on what is good ammunition for competition or other non SD uses.
zincwarrior is offline  
Old October 10, 2012, 07:35 AM   #5
BillM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Amity Oregon
Posts: 791
Remington/UMC 115 gr FMJ is about the softest shooting over the counter
9mm ammo I've tried, as well as being the cheapest around here.

Chrono's just over the 125 pf floor in most full size guns---but it's close.
If you are shooting a major match with chrono, be sure to check it in
YOUR gun---going sub-minor and shooting "for fun" really isn't all that
much fun.
BillM is offline  
Old October 10, 2012, 09:09 AM   #6
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,540
What 9mm ammunition can you GET in Sydney?

In general, a slow heavy bullet will have less felt recoil than a light fast one.
But the inexpensive bulk ammunition will have light fast bullets because lead costs more than powder.

I shot Winchester White Box 115 grain while my reloading equipment was in storage.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old October 11, 2012, 05:15 PM   #7
10mmAuto
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 13, 2010
Posts: 598
Quote:
In general, a slow heavy bullet will have less felt recoil than a light fast one.
Disagree. Unless the light one is over powdered or has an abrupt and high peak to its pressure curve it will have less recoil. Recoil is a function of momentum which tends to make heavier rounds recoil more heavily in a given caliber. That's holding everything constant, though, the manufacturers you're using may be loading it in that way or you're using a shortish barreled weapon.
10mmAuto is offline  
Old October 11, 2012, 09:30 PM   #8
Gerry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 382
Quote:
Recoil is a function of momentum which tends to make heavier rounds recoil more heavily in a given caliber.
Momentum is actually a product of mass and speed, not mass alone. In other words, relative momentum is equivalent to the measurement of IPSC power factor. A 115gr bullet traveling 1130 fps has the same momentum as a 147gr bullet traveling about 880 fps. Both make minor power factor and can be used for production division. But which have the lightest "felt" recoil?

It takes MUCH less powder in order to move a heavier bullet the same power factor as a lighter bullet. Less power = less gas expansion = less energy. Remember that not all that energy is contributing to the momentum of that bullet. This is why I have never witnessed anyone (that is not a newbie) in production division who shoots anything lighter than a 147gr bullet. I shoot one heavier than that.

Contrast this to those who shoot 9mm open division with major PF. They want as much energy as possible in the form of huge volumes of gasses that will make their compensator work. So their trick is to use the lightest bullet allowed and stuff the most powder they can in a case while making major. While a great deal of that energy isn't transferred to the bullet, it doesn't end up going out the end of the barrel, but instead exhausts from the ports to compensate for the gun's tendency to flip up during recoil.
Gerry is offline  
Old October 12, 2012, 08:27 AM   #9
LSnSC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2010
Posts: 514
In my production gun, an XD 5.25 the 147's, pushed fast enough to make PF have a smoother recoil impulse. This allows me to get back on target faster.
The 115's, when pushed fast enough to make PF have faster, snappier recoil. I imagine thats why most of the folks who are competitive are shooting 147's.

Occasionally I'll shoot my G21 in production and SSP. You dont have to push a 230gr bullet very fast to make the 125 PF, so to me it, shoots even softer than the 9mm. Its just more expensive.

Bullet weight is not necessarily the determining factor for recoil.
LSnSC is offline  
Old October 12, 2012, 07:44 PM   #10
10mmAuto
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 13, 2010
Posts: 598
Quote:
Momentum is actually a product of mass and speed, not mass alone
I know, that's why I said holding everything else constant.
10mmAuto is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 03:20 AM   #11
gunrobot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2009
Posts: 442
Quote:
What 9mm ammunition can you GET in Sydney?
+1.

If you're not reloading, shoot any 9mm ammo you can get reliably and cheaply where you are. Lots of folk in my area shoot 115gr factory ammo because of the price.
gunrobot is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 06:19 AM   #12
lmccrock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2007
Location: Red Rock. TX
Posts: 820
Quote:
I know, that's why I said holding everything else constant.
No problem, but "everything else" includes power factor, which is bullet momentum, not energy. Something HAS to change with bullet weight to keep PF the same, and that is powder weight.

Anyway...smenkhare, let us know what you can get. We will do what we can.
lmccrock is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 06:33 AM   #13
Gerry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 382
Quote:
I know, that's why I said holding everything else constant.
Yes I see that now. But realize that in real life, it's impossible to have everything else constant when it comes to bullet weight. If a heavier bullet and lighter one are pushed at the same speed, speed may be constant but power factor is not.

If a 147 gr bullet was shot with the same speed as some +P 115 gr commercial rounds, to 1350 fps for example, the 147 gr bullet would have a power factor of nearly 200. Minor PF is only 125 and major PF is 165. Most people shooting 9mm major shoot open race guns that are specially designed to handle the high pressures caused by such rounds. But 200 PF? I'd be waiting safely on the other side of the berm while you tested your first round.

Whether commercial rounds or home made according to directions in a reloading manual, generally the heavier the bullet, the less power is required, and the less velocity is achieved. But chamber pressure and power factor remain fairly constant across loads appearing in the same min-max scale.

Everything is relative I guess
Gerry is offline  
Old October 13, 2012, 06:49 AM   #14
Gerry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 382
Quote:
I've finally sent away for my pistol license and am looking at IPSC production division. Other than hand loads, what ammunition do you reccomend?
I figured I would post something on topic...

First smenkhare, I think you're going about it in the right way. Until you learn the fundamentals, get your black badge, and shoot a few matches, you're not at the stage where you require the competitive edge that custom loads will give you anyway. You probably wont notice much difference at this stage between bullet weights either with commercial ammunition. So like other posters said, get what's cheapest and most available and go have fun.

Your degree of involvement in the sport will eventually dictate whether you need to reload for yourself. When your wife catches trying to sell the family car for a crate of ammo, well that's about the right time...
Gerry is offline  
Old October 14, 2012, 09:49 AM   #15
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
less money, more ammo

Check out the remanufactured choices from Georgia Arms.
__________________
.
"all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old October 16, 2012, 03:08 PM   #16
Jesse Tischauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 26, 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 209
Factory Remington Green box barely makes minor power factor. I run Federal Wal Mart 9mm in all my guns. Its not as accurate or as soft as my buddies hand loads but its the cheapest thing I can find anytime day or night.
Jesse Tischauser is offline  
Old June 22, 2014, 09:39 AM   #17
Silence is golden
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 5, 2014
Posts: 3
My best round for 9mm is 158 gr. Sub sonic PF is 137
Silence is golden is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05489 seconds with 10 queries