|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 5, 2012, 12:39 AM | #1 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
IL: Winbigler v. Warren County Housing Authority.
SAF Press release:
Quote:
You can take note that David Sigale is the attorney here. The SAF is apparently trying to do what the NRA couldn't do in their case, Scott v. D.C. Housing Authority (#52). In this case, Stephan Halbrook voluntarily dismissed his case on Feb. 16th, when it came to light that his plaintiff didn't really want a gun. Another case, Doe v. Wilmington Housing Authority et al, (#53) an NRA backed case has gone south and has been awaiting a decision on cross-MSJ's since July 15th, 2011. Here the plaintiff has actually agreed with the reasoning of the defendants actions, during deposition. This SAF suit appears to be much better than what we have seen, to date. |
|
September 17, 2012, 12:31 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 19, 2012
Posts: 4
|
Would they disarm active duty police offirs as well?
Would they disarm active duty police offirs as well?
disarming retired and active duty police officers directly violates LEOSA federal law however they are also violating state and federal gun ownership law by denying him the right to bear arms which is made worse because it is government funded. What would stop them from disarming an employed police officer. |
September 17, 2012, 05:23 PM | #3 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
david sigale , illinois , saf , second amendment |
|
|