|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 17, 2009, 01:20 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Reloads VS Factory ammo in SD gun CONT:
I addressed this debate to the Wyoming Attorney General who passed it to the Wyoming Dept of Criminal Justice (who handles CCW permits & Such).
Based on the response, I dont think I would loose any sleep regarding carrying reloads in Wyoming. (Based on Wyoming Law that States if one is involved in a ligit SD shooting, he/she cant be sued civily). You're state may or may not be differant. Basicly one should carry what he/she feels comfortable with. Personally I feel more comfortable with my own ammo. Quote:
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
March 17, 2009, 01:27 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2009
Location: Shallowater, Texas
Posts: 444
|
I was told by my CHL instuctor to never use reloads for self defense, for legal reasons. What the reasons are I dont know, he didnt elaborate, and I didnt ask. Personally I would trust a Gold Dot or Hornady TAP over any of my reloads for self defense.
|
March 17, 2009, 01:34 PM | #3 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 17, 2009, 01:50 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
There are two separate issues here. This is often forgotten:
1. Are there legal proscriptions against reloads? 2. Are reloads going to make a bad impression on the jury? a. The DA explicitly brings it up and denounces you. b. The DA just presents the reloads and describes them factual but hoping that the fact that you reload makes you look a touch off. I'm bored repeating that jury research does show that the impression formation can be important in ambiguous shoot cases. The WY letter doesn't speak to #2. Nor would the impression formation issue usually surface in appeals or legal data bases. Summary: Whatever you carry should be able to be justified as reasonable by your lawyer or expert opinion.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
March 17, 2009, 01:52 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Let me back up. If its a ligit shooting, it wont go before a jury. If its not, then reloads are the least of your problems. Again, in Wyoming, if its a ligit shooting YOU ARE EXEMPT FROM CIVIL CASES.
I can also address Alaska. If its a ligit shooting you dont go to criminal court, the cornor's inquest determins if its self defence or not. I spent 20 yrs as a LE officer in Anchorage, and was certified as a EOD & Firearms Expert by the Courts of Alaska. SD ammo never came up. Any shooting goes to the Cornor's Inquest. That determines if it was self defence or an unjustifiable shooting. If its ruled as unjustifiable, then it goes to the Prosicuter who determines if he has a case. If he feels he does, it goes to the Grand Jury. They determine if there is enough evedence to bring it to trial. But like I said, choose what you are comfortable with. Know your state laws, and get advise from the Attonrney General's Office.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
March 17, 2009, 01:56 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 701
|
+1 AR15Chase I wouldnt trust my life to my reloads.
|
March 17, 2009, 02:01 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
If you are in court, someone doesn't think it is a legit shooting and then you have to worry about image impression.
We can find SD cases that went to court and the actor found not guilty. Thus, they are definitionally ambiguous. Some thought it was bad and some thought is was good. We are talking about if you go to trial - can appearances impact jurors? For instance, I recall watching a trial of an officer charged with shooting someone. In his officer pictures - he has no glasses and one of those military haircuts. Looks like a real tough case. One trial - he is wearing intellectual type glasses and has his hair grown out? Looks like a nice middle class guy - not a warrior. Why?
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
March 17, 2009, 02:06 PM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Posts: 14
|
A debate is going on on this topic in the reloading forum:
http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/....php?p=3372774 And they link to this post which lists three cases where reloads have been a factor (post is by Massad Ayoob): http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost....&postcount=140 While not by any means a prevalent factor in cases, it seems like the savings from reloading self-defense ammunition isn't worth it. |
March 17, 2009, 02:19 PM | #9 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 17, 2009, 02:46 PM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,989
|
People use handgun reloads primarily to save money. If a person expects to be shooting people in self-defense on a very frequent basis then I could see how using reloads for self-defense would save a significant amount of money.
However, that's totally unrealistic. Most of us will never be involved in a self-defense shooting, and those who are almost certainly won't be involved in multiple self-defense shootings. Which means that the amount of ammunition expended in a lifetime of self-defense shootings is quite small. At most, a person might need 300 rounds of self-defense ammunition for a lifetime of use. Enough to prove it's functional in their handgun and enough to make up for the wear and tear ammo incurs as a result of being carried. But what about practice? For practice the shooter can use his own reloads which duplicate the basic characteristics of the SD ammunition. Using reloads for SD has caused problems in a few cases. Not frequently, but it has happened. Those problems, while infrequent can cost a lot of money, hassle and may even result in prosecution*/civil liability in the worst case. Against that, one must balance the savings on 300 rounds of factory ammunition vs. handloaded ammunition, amortised over a lifetime. It's an easy decision once you look at it objectively. *Prosecution due to the circumstances of the case being clouded by the use of handloads, NOT being prosecuted SPECIFICALLY for using handloads.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
March 17, 2009, 03:07 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
I reload, because my reloads are better (for me) then factory. Its not necessarly cheaper in some aspects. An example is the ammo I use for HIGH POWER. Cant really say thats cheaper then what I could buy. I also have more confidence in my reloaded ammo. Factory have screw ups just like everyone else. Even the Army. Once years ago DCM (before DCM became CMP) use to provide military ammo for leg matches, and required military ammo be used. We got a shipment of 30 cal ammo for the match that turned out not to have any primer flash holes. This would have been a problem but at the time I was running a NG sniper school using M1C/Ds and was able to provide M72 so we could fire the match. APD use to issue, 125 Gn JHP Winchester 357 ammo. We found several cases where primers were in sideways, and the mouths were deformed because care wasnt used in belling the cases. Its not common, but it does happen. One needs to inspect his ammo regardless whether its factory or handloads. With handloads its possible to imspect the components. If factory was perfect, there would be no recalls. When I first hired on with APD, the issue ammo was 158 grn RNs lead that was cast and loaded by jail trusties, Needless to say I carried my reloads then too.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
March 17, 2009, 03:26 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2005
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 2,723
|
New Hampshire v. Sgt. James Kennedy and New Jersey v. Daniel Bias are the cases I'm aware of where reloads have been an issue. Massad Ayoob has been on here several times in the past talking about those cases in threads similiar to this one.
In the first case, the defendent (a police officer) was painted as a rambo for rolling his own ammunition, but he ultimately prevailed (I belive the case was about unintentionally discharging his handgun into a suspects foot). In the second case, Daniel Bias was accused of shooting his wife. He claimed she committed suicide and that the gun shot residue tests were wrong, because the gun was loaded with light handloads and the State tested the gun with full power ammunition. I don't recall the final disposition of the case, but I want to say he was found guilty of killing his wife. |
March 17, 2009, 03:55 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2007
Location: Shawnee, KS
Posts: 1,093
|
While I never worried about carrying reloads I decided to make it a non-issue.
1. I bought a box each of 125gr and 158gr bullets from Double-tap 2. I fired some of each to determine point of impact vs. point of aim with my fixed sight SD revolver. 3. I made my own full power reloads that match the poi vs. poa for practice. 4. I carry the DT and don't have to buy anymore because I'll never shoot it again other than in a SD situation. If I used them in a semi-auto they would get shot up over time because of the wear put on the cartridge by cycling the action. There is no such concern with a revolver. |
March 17, 2009, 04:03 PM | #14 | |||||
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,989
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The confidence factor (how you FEEL) is probably the most significant argument you've raised. Since how you feel about something subjective and personal, it's not really possible to counter that argument.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|||||
March 17, 2009, 04:35 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
This comment I dont agree with at all. Pistols/Revolvers are every bit as differant as rifles. One size does not fit all. Look at any two or more reloading manuels. Each if loading the same charge of powder will get differant results, both in pressure and velocity. Even if they use the same brand model of test gun. My 642 has differant requriements for 148 Gn WC bullets then my Smith Model 52, My 1911 hardball (Bullseye) gun had differant target ammo requirements them my Center Fire 1911. My pin or steal gun has differant requirements then my Bullseye guns. My 6" in S&W model 27 has differant requirments them my 4" Model 28. I try to pick my powder burning rate based on barrel length. Lead for hunting with pistols should be harder then whats required for punching holes in targets. PPC matchs ofter require SWCs where straight WCs are better for 38s in Bullseye. I can go on and on, but we can see the point. One size doesnt fix all in guns or anything else. That is the main reason I USE, for reloading, to tailer a give round for a given pistol/revolver. Something I havent found in factory ammo. Yes if you shoot alot, you will save money, that I will not deny.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
March 17, 2009, 06:15 PM | #16 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Location: SW Louisiana
Posts: 2,289
|
Quote:
|
|
March 17, 2009, 06:16 PM | #17 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,989
|
Quote:
The above paragraph from your post is a whole school of red herrings combined with a good bit of hair-splitting. Sure you have widely varying ammunition requirements for all those guns you list. That's because all the guns you list are used for widely varying activities. This thread is specifically about SD and SD guns. That's ONE application, ONE requirement, ONE basic class of guns. In my experience, it's easy to find premium self-defense factory handgun ammunition that is MORE than accurate enough to fulfill the requirements of the most demanding shooters. In fact, if you start with Federal or Hornady, you'll probably have to shoot only a couple of loads to find a round that provides accuracy that exceeds the accuracy capabilities of the vast majority of handgun shooters and that provides excellent terminal performance. If you want to get picky you can also select for things like low-flash, etc. In other words, the vast majority of shooters can try a couple of different types of ammunition and find one that performs well beyond their requirements. There is simply no need for them to reload, and if they do the only significant benefit they would be able to point to is the difference in price. It's not the same as trying to wring another fraction of an MOA out of a rifle at extended ranges, to use the example of high power rifle. Furthermore, no matter how good a person's handloads are, they haven't been tested a fraction as much as premium self-defense factory ammunition is. The factories have the resources and expertise to tailor their loads to provide ideal penetration and expansion and the time and money to test them exhaustively to insure that they perform as expected even after penetrating likely encountered obstacles. No handloader has the resources to perform that kind of testing.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
|
|