The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 20, 2007, 07:01 PM   #26
tuckerdog1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 20, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 281
Perhaps a stolen gun will go back to it's rightful owner. That would be nice.

Tuckerdog1
__________________
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the
black flag, and begin slitting throats. - Henry Louis Mencken
tuckerdog1 is offline  
Old November 21, 2007, 10:55 AM   #27
PPGMD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Posts: 348
Quote:
...I called a line brake and took the guns from the two suspect while they were putting their targets out...
Personally I wouldn't have touched the weapons. I don't mind explaining the intricacies of the NFA to other shooters, but attempting to confiscate them that is a whole other story and you could have found yourself in a situation that could quickly escalate.

If the weapons were needed to be taken away you should have let the SWAT officer handle it. Theoretically you could have been charged with possession of an unregistered firearm, even if they were legal, as soon as they are out of the control of the owner they are considered unregistered because they are only registered to the owner.
PPGMD is offline  
Old November 21, 2007, 03:11 PM   #28
Ultima-Ratio
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 227
Gotta Be A Gag, Like The Mall Ninjas!

Firstly, real LEOs never work with rentacops/security guards.

You expect me to believe that real cops walked away from a freebee felony beef? AND left them in a rentacops custody?

Where's the BS meter smilie?
Ultima-Ratio is offline  
Old November 21, 2007, 04:44 PM   #29
Erik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
Good for you, ESI.

---

Lots of on the job types would pass the duty to patrol given the situation. Nothing hinky soounding about it at all.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective
Erik is offline  
Old November 21, 2007, 07:05 PM   #30
ISC
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,982
I had a hard time believing this was real too, between the bad grammer/spelling, self important posturing and mall ninja attitude it seemed a little far fetched. There really are people that roll that way.

I have to remind myself sometimes that the internet is full of imposters, posers, and wannabes, and that there are plenty of losers that will make up or exaggerate a situation in order to justify their self aggrandizement and self image.

Personally I think that every illegal that gets locked up makes the country better, and the same thing for people that may be technically legal but refuse to assimilate.

A member here has been PM'ing me about this and implying that I'm a rascist because I think that you can identify people who are more likely to be illegals by their looks and demeanor. That's not rascist, that's common sense. I could tell you who is more likely to be a cop or have a military background too, people give off signs and the astute observor picks up on them.

I think the two men discussed here should be treated differently than someone that appears to be a law abiding citizen.

When I'm on the range I pay attention to the folks around me shooting, and think that someone that is giving out the vibe of being a criminal deserves scrutiny and a couple of questions, possibly followed by a suggestion to leave. However, if a fat moron in a security guard uniform starts giving me crap about my weapons I'm not going to worry about hurting his feelings when I tell him to mind his own business when I tell him to get out of my face, and if he took my guns he'd be looking at having his teeth kicked in when I take them back.

Maybe they do things different in California, but that's how it works around here.

Last edited by ISC; November 21, 2007 at 07:09 PM. Reason: trying to be nicer
ISC is offline  
Old November 21, 2007, 10:04 PM   #31
Ruthless4christ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Location: CNY
Posts: 790
the deal

gus are very hard to come by in latin america and ammo extremely expensive. it is not unheard of for gang and mafia members from latin america to come to america and train with differant weapons here, and take back that experience to the battleground back in thier countries. great job and we all need to keep our eyes more open.

Amazing you dont here about this in the media. if 2 law abiding americans with legel silencers commited a crime, you can be sure it would make headlines. we dont want to make the wet-backs look bad though
Ruthless4christ is offline  
Old November 23, 2007, 04:25 AM   #32
ESI Agent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 6, 2004
Posts: 414
First I was not working, I was at the range shooting as a member ,as a member IM also put on line as the acting range master to work the line. So their was no rent a cops at the location. I like the term "Rent a Cop" A private person is not a COP theirfore he or she cannot be a rent a cop thats a term that is used by people who don't think for themselves. A rent a cop is an off duty COP who is working security. When law enforcement personal work as security guards you are renting cops and often times they are comtracted by the mall to give extra protection. The movie industry hires retired/active law enforcement to work security and they are in fact renting their services and they are cops so use your insight. As for the incident that was posted "Don't hate" It is what it is. And as far as insulting someone on the net it is usually done in poor taste and lacks testicle fortuted when not done in their presence.
ESI Agent is offline  
Old November 23, 2007, 05:23 PM   #33
Para Bellum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Quote:
I think the fact that they weren't Americans is a big difference. If they were Americans I'd say that they were exercising their constitutional right to keep and bear arms
Does that right only apply to americans? The 2nd amendment says:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

I don't mind who you are and where you come from as long as you're a good guy. And I don't care where you come from if you'r a bad guy.
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum
If you want peace - prepare for war
Para Bellum is offline  
Old November 23, 2007, 05:49 PM   #34
woodland
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2001
Location: western wa.
Posts: 564
Para Bellum
Quote:
Does that right only apply to americans? The 2nd amendment says:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Yes, I believe it was meant to apply just to Americans. The opening statement of the Preamble to the Constitution says "We the people of The United States of America." Not "We the people of Mexico who are living in America illegally."

If you want to enjoy the rights and freedoms that are part of being a citizen of this country, then the least you should expect to have to do is actually become a citizen of it.
__________________
"There is no spoon..."
woodland is offline  
Old November 24, 2007, 12:35 AM   #35
Ruthless4christ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Location: CNY
Posts: 790
uh-huh

First of all off course this only applied to Americans, otherwise the Declaration of Independence, would have been followed by an American conquest of the world.

Second of all “good guys” usually don’t break the law as these guys were. I personally believe that a lot of the laws (not just gun laws) infringe on my personal rights under the constitution but,

A. I am not paid to interpret, or change those laws and:

B. unless I am ready to take up arms to change these laws(which I am not) I had better be LAW ABIDING GOOD GUY, and obey them like everyone else. Otherwise I fully deserve the Swat team to be waiting for me at my shooting station next time I come back from a target change.
Ruthless4christ is offline  
Old November 24, 2007, 12:39 AM   #36
weldonjr2001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2001
Location: San Antonio, Tx.
Posts: 462
Since you're asking for opinions, I don't believe you should have touched another person's guns while they were downrange. It could have turned nasty if they saw you doing it, and had other weapons with them, as I always do when I go downrange and have left something back at the line.

You should have left it to real LEOs. You didn't know for a fact they were doing anything illegal. They could have had homemade barrel stabilizers for all you knew.
weldonjr2001 is offline  
Old November 24, 2007, 01:30 PM   #37
Zombie Steve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2007
Location: Old Colorado City
Posts: 527
You did fine. I hope it gets a criminal out of circulation for awhile...
Zombie Steve is offline  
Old November 24, 2007, 02:42 PM   #38
kermit315
Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2007
Location: PT Mugu NAWC, CA
Posts: 55



im with root canal.....enough people get hassled just for OLL here, they arent letting anybody even close to being associated with silencers go. and if you are the LEO, you arent letting them out of your sight period. Just doesnt make sense. Name the range, I would like to give them a call also.
__________________
Ruger P89 with Hogue grip
Mossberg 183 DB bolt action .410
Charles Daly Field Tactical 12ga
Walther P22
kermit315 is offline  
Old November 24, 2007, 03:31 PM   #39
GLP Standard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2005
Posts: 286
You know, his story may be full of holes, and I have my doubts as to whether or not its true. Im voting for not, but then again, who am I to judge, and who cares really? Everyone on the internet tries to be something theyre not. People act much tougher, smarter and talk more [color=#FF0000]█[/color][color=#FF0000]█[/color][color=#FF0000]█[/color][color=#FF0000]█[/color][color=#FF0000]█[/color] on the internet than they do in person, because its so much easier. I take the story for what it is, and thats a good lesson, whether it was true or not. The only person who will ever know if the story is true is the thread starter, unless of course, he wants to tell us hes lying
GLP Standard is offline  
Old November 24, 2007, 05:34 PM   #40
JWT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
I have to agree with rootcanal on this one. I'm having lots of trouble convincing myself the story isn't fabricated.
JWT is offline  
Old November 25, 2007, 02:12 AM   #41
crossfireltd
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2007
Posts: 4
You did fine...maybe if this mindset was present before and on 9/11 my youngest Daughter and Nephew would still be alive today.
__________________
Commonwealth of Virginia CCW
SA XD45 4" Service Model-Black
Taurus Millennium Pro PT145 Polymer/Stainless
Benelli M1 MB Tactical Special 12ga. 18.5"
crossfireltd is offline  
Old November 25, 2007, 05:08 AM   #42
ESI Agent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 6, 2004
Posts: 414
I don't care to name the range due to , I don't want people calling up asking questions that IM sure they don't want people to know , it's not good business. As far as BS I don't BS,it is what it is.
ESI Agent is offline  
Old November 25, 2007, 03:13 PM   #43
Capt. Charlie
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Location: Steubenville, OH
Posts: 4,446
Enough.

This had little bearing on Tactics & Training to begin with; calling folks liars is the final nail in the coffin.

Closed.
__________________
TFL Members are ambassadors to the world for firearm owners. What kind of ambassador does your post make you?

I train in earnest, to do the things that I pray in earnest, I'll never have to do.

--Capt. Charlie
Capt. Charlie is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07328 seconds with 10 queries