New line of Glock pistols - Page 5

smee78 · November 30, 2013, 08:43 PM

I think I would have to hold this new single stack design to see if I like it before I jump on the bandwagon. Right now the older S&W single stacks fill this role for me. We will see...

SIMP · December 5, 2013, 12:04 PM

http://www.sportsmans-depot.com/prod...UI4250201.html

Not my words, taken from another forum:
"The other model will be the Glock 42. SKU number is UI4250201, which indicates US-made, fixed sights and a low-capacity (10 or less) magazine. Wholesale price on this is only slightly above the Gen3 models, so street price should be $539.95. I think this is a new single stack .380 or 9mm of some sort.”

southjk · December 5, 2013, 12:09 PM

I found the info on the 41 interesting as well.

Quote:

I was doing some ordering for the shop this evening, and found that the new models are already in our distributor’s system.

One model will be the Glock 41. SKU numbers are PG4130101 and PG4130103, which indicate adjustable sights, and a low-cap and hi-cap version. The Glock 41 is more expensive than any of Glock’s other pistols to date; based on the wholesale cost I’m seeing, street price will be $779.95 at my shop. Given that, my official guess is that the new Glock Model 41 is going to be an optics-ready, competition-oriented pistol to compete with the S&W M&P CORE and FNH-USA FNX-45 Tactical.

Quote found here.

Already listed for sale here.

SIMP · December 5, 2013, 12:10 PM

Oh yeah, here's the link to a Glock 41 soon to be for sale:

http://www.sportsmans-depot.com/prod...PG4130103.html

SIMP · December 5, 2013, 12:13 PM

Interesting Video:

http://youtu.be/bmV9l8uFyLo

southjk · December 5, 2013, 12:15 PM

So it looks like the 41 will be a 45acp, competition oriented with a 13 rd mag and the 42 will be a 380.

Quote:

Downthread in the same discussion, someone has this alleged data pull:

GLOCK UI4250201 GLOCK 42FS 380ACP 3.26″ FS 764503910616 0 $352.00 $399.00

And one retailer already has this up, although without a picture.

GLOCK 41 GEN 4 45ACP 5.3 AS 13RD GLOCK PG4130103 $645.00 $774.99

Glenn E. Meyer · December 6, 2013, 11:06 AM

Can't get excited by a fat 380. I bought an LCP just for its small size as compared to my belt guns.

The 45 - meh - I have a 1911 for when I shoot 45 in competitions/.

dajowi · December 6, 2013, 11:53 AM

Had my fill of Glocks with their single stack .45. And all the Glocks that I've shot at the range. They couldn't entice me to purchase another Glock - period.

jimbob86 · December 7, 2013, 02:43 AM

Quote:

It should be in 9mm, that is where the market is.

You forget the arrogance of Gaston Glock: they already have several versions of 9mm "Perfection" that can not be improved upon ........

I want a Glock, just for a practical, hands-on demonstration of poor ergonomics when shot alongside pistols designed to be held in a human hand .....

kcub · December 7, 2013, 07:11 AM

That video is not from the horses mouth; however, it is rumored that it could very well be from the opposite end of said horse.

Pico · December 7, 2013, 08:21 AM

It will be a scaled down 36 firing 9 mm or .40. Nothing else makes sense. A
.380 makes no sense. Another .45 ACP would be redundant. After saying that, what makes sense is rarely what will really happen in this world.

Pico

Brian Pfleuger · December 7, 2013, 08:56 AM

Why wouldn't a .380 make sense? It's the only major caliber missing from Glock's American line, they already make .380 outside the U.S. but they can't be imported. They now have U.S. Production so it's no longer an import. It seems to me that the .380 is the only thing that DOES make sense.

Pico · December 7, 2013, 09:01 AM

Hardest ammo to find and expensive. Maybe they will make them but pocket 9's are where it is in this class of gun.

Pico

Uncle Malice · December 7, 2013, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Why wouldn't a .380 make sense? It's the only major caliber missing from Glock's American line, they already make .380 outside the U.S. but they can't be imported. They now have U.S. Production so it's no longer an import. It seems to me that the .380 is the only thing that DOES make sense.

I have a question about this - and maybe it's just my own ignorance - but since Glock now has a full production spectrum in the US, meaning that you can get completely US-made Glock 19, 17, 22, etc. would it still not be legal for Glock to produce their already-in-existence .380acp models here in the US?

As I understand it, the ONLY reason the .380s are unavailable in the US is due to import points. If it were produced in the US, I would assume this no longer applies.... so perhaps Glock will be able to sell the G28/G29 here in the US once they have production of those models set up.... no?

Brian Pfleuger · December 7, 2013, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Malice

I have a question about this - and maybe it's just my own ignorance - but since Glock now has a full production spectrum in the US, meaning that you can get completely US-made Glock 19, 17, 22, etc. would it still not be legal for Glock to produce their already-in-existence .380acp models here in the US?

As I understand it, the ONLY reason the .380s are unavailable in the US is due to import points. If it were produced in the US, I would assume this no longer applies.... so perhaps Glock will be able to sell the G28/G29 here in the US once they have production of those models set up.... no?

They could but I'm not sure there's much of a US market for those guns. A micro 380 seems like a better bet.

Peter M. Eick · December 7, 2013, 12:50 PM

I agree with Brian, a micro glock 380 makes a lot of sense locally. 380 is not that hard to find (at least around here) but a fat bodied 28/29 is probably not going to do as well as say a 238 or mustang competitor.

I know I would pick one (micro glock 380) just on the principal of it.

Nathan · December 7, 2013, 01:24 PM

I was really hoping they would cut the G26 and G27 in half and add a 3rd finger to the grip Kahr P9 or P40!

Uncle Malice · December 26, 2013, 08:44 AM

Well, it looks like we have more info on the Glock 42. It seems to be confirmed that the G42 is indeed a single stack 380. Here are pictures and specs.

Real? I don't know... seems to be though.

I would REALLY like this exact gun made for a 9mm...

Guess I'll be ordering the Shield....

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...k-42-revealed/

whip1 · December 26, 2013, 10:32 AM

I don't get why anyone would want a .380. 9mm can be made the same size and carry the same amount of rounds. 9mm is much cheaper, and more readily available. There's no advantage to .380 that I can see.

Glenn E. Meyer · December 26, 2013, 11:09 AM

Oh, no - someone at the IDPA match had secret knowledge that it was the carbine.

How does it compare to the LCP level guns - if it is much bigger which it seems, then why?

Noreaster · December 26, 2013, 11:17 AM

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...k-42-revealed/

It looks great, except for the caliber. Why build a 380 acp??????? Glock is a day late and a dollar short on this one!

Uncle Malice · December 26, 2013, 11:23 AM

I agree with you guys. The size would be wonderful if it were a 9mm...

I have no interest at all in a .380. I think that trend is mostly over. They should have built some competition for the Shield. I can't say that I'm that bummed about it though. The Shield is a GREAT little gun.

thedudeabides · December 26, 2013, 02:26 PM

I already have a full size tank HK45 that is better than any full-sized brick can hope to be, and a stable of 1911s that will outshoot any "target" Block.

...and Block 42?

They could have just made a proper single stack 9mm.

Glock is late to the party.

Uncle Malice · December 26, 2013, 02:38 PM

Quote:

I already have a full size tank HK45 that is better than any full-sized brick can hope to be, and a stable of 1911s that will outshoot any "target" Block.

I'm always happy to accept a challenge. If you're ever in AZ, I'd love to compete. My Glock 21 vs your HK45 - distance of your choosing.

seeker_two · December 26, 2013, 02:45 PM

As a direct competitor to the Ruger LC380 & Walther PK380, it could work. But I do hope a 9mm & .40 version is close behind.

November 30, 2013, 08:43 PM	#101
smee78 Senior Member Join Date: July 14, 2008 Location: South Carolina Posts: 2,918	I think I would have to hold this new single stack design to see if I like it before I jump on the bandwagon. Right now the older S&W single stacks fill this role for me. We will see... __________________ We know exactly where one cow with Mad-cow-disease is located, among the millions and millions of cows in America, but we haven't got a clue where thousands of illegal immigrants and terrorists are

December 6, 2013, 11:06 AM	#107
Glenn E. Meyer Senior Member Join Date: November 17, 2000 Posts: 20,064	Can't get excited by a fat 380. I bought an LCP just for its small size as compared to my belt guns. The 45 - meh - I have a 1911 for when I shoot 45 in competitions/. __________________ NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens

December 7, 2013, 08:21 AM	#111
Pico Senior Member Join Date: July 5, 2002 Location: Ga Posts: 515	Next Glock It will be a scaled down 36 firing 9 mm or .40. Nothing else makes sense. A .380 makes no sense. Another .45 ACP would be redundant. After saying that, what makes sense is rarely what will really happen in this world. Pico

December 7, 2013, 08:56 AM	#112
Brian Pfleuger Moderator Emeritus Join Date: June 25, 2008 Location: Austin, CO Posts: 19,578	New line of Glock pistols Why wouldn't a .380 make sense? It's the only major caliber missing from Glock's American line, they already make .380 outside the U.S. but they can't be imported. They now have U.S. Production so it's no longer an import. It seems to me that the .380 is the only thing that DOES make sense.

December 7, 2013, 09:01 AM	#113
Pico Senior Member Join Date: July 5, 2002 Location: Ga Posts: 515	.380 Hardest ammo to find and expensive. Maybe they will make them but pocket 9's are where it is in this class of gun. Pico

December 5, 2013, 12:04 PM	#102
SIMP Senior Member Join Date: October 2, 2005 Location: Mississippi Posts: 398	http://www.sportsmans-depot.com/prod...UI4250201.html Not my words, taken from another forum: "The other model will be the Glock 42. SKU number is UI4250201, which indicates US-made, fixed sights and a low-capacity (10 or less) magazine. Wholesale price on this is only slightly above the Gen3 models, so street price should be $539.95. I think this is a new single stack .380 or 9mm of some sort.”

December 5, 2013, 12:10 PM	#104
SIMP Senior Member Join Date: October 2, 2005 Location: Mississippi Posts: 398	Oh yeah, here's the link to a Glock 41 soon to be for sale: http://www.sportsmans-depot.com/prod...PG4130103.html

December 5, 2013, 12:13 PM	#105
SIMP Senior Member Join Date: October 2, 2005 Location: Mississippi Posts: 398	Interesting Video: http://youtu.be/bmV9l8uFyLo

December 6, 2013, 11:53 AM	#108
dajowi Senior Member Join Date: November 2, 2005 Posts: 1,196	Had my fill of Glocks with their single stack .45. And all the Glocks that I've shot at the range. They couldn't entice me to purchase another Glock - period.

December 7, 2013, 07:11 AM	#110
kcub Senior Member Join Date: October 24, 2010 Location: Austin, Texas Posts: 3,318	That video is not from the horses mouth; however, it is rumored that it could very well be from the opposite end of said horse.

December 7, 2013, 12:50 PM	#116
Peter M. Eick Senior Member Join Date: August 3, 1999 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 2,991	I agree with Brian, a micro glock 380 makes a lot of sense locally. 380 is not that hard to find (at least around here) but a fat bodied 28/29 is probably not going to do as well as say a 238 or mustang competitor. I know I would pick one (micro glock 380) just on the principal of it. __________________ 10mm and 357sig, the best things to come along since the 38 super!

December 7, 2013, 01:24 PM	#117
Nathan Senior Member Join Date: July 1, 2001 Posts: 6,333	I was really hoping they would cut the G26 and G27 in half and add a 3rd finger to the grip Kahr P9 or P40!

December 26, 2013, 08:44 AM	#118
Uncle Malice Senior Member Join Date: May 11, 2009 Location: Phoenix Posts: 4,580	Well, it looks like we have more info on the Glock 42. It seems to be confirmed that the G42 is indeed a single stack 380. Here are pictures and specs. Real? I don't know... seems to be though. I would REALLY like this exact gun made for a 9mm... Guess I'll be ordering the Shield.... http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...k-42-revealed/ __________________ Handguns: 2x Glock 19.4 \| Glock 26.4 \| HK USP 9 \| HK P2000 \| HK VP9 SK \| HK P30 \| CZ Shadow 2 \| CZ P-10 C \| CZ P-07 \| CZP-01 \| S&W 360PD Rifles: DDM4 \| SGL 21 \| SAM7K \| Draco \| PSA PDW SBR \| ASA Side-Charger SBR \| CZ Scorpion K SBR \| Aero M4E1 9" 300blk SBR \| Angstadt Jack9 SBR \| Savage Mark II FV-SR Shotguns: Mossberg 590A1 20" SP \| Mossberg Shockwave Last edited by Spats McGee; December 26, 2013 at 10:39 AM.

December 26, 2013, 10:32 AM	#119
whip1 Senior Member Join Date: January 6, 2007 Location: Ohio Posts: 383	I don't get why anyone would want a .380. 9mm can be made the same size and carry the same amount of rounds. 9mm is much cheaper, and more readily available. There's no advantage to .380 that I can see.

December 26, 2013, 11:09 AM	#120
Glenn E. Meyer Senior Member Join Date: November 17, 2000 Posts: 20,064	Oh, no - someone at the IDPA match had secret knowledge that it was the carbine. How does it compare to the LCP level guns - if it is much bigger which it seems, then why? __________________ NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens

December 26, 2013, 11:17 AM	#121
Noreaster Senior Member Join Date: January 30, 2011 Location: New England Posts: 1,449	http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...k-42-revealed/ It looks great, except for the caliber. Why build a 380 acp??????? Glock is a day late and a dollar short on this one!

December 26, 2013, 11:23 AM	#122
Uncle Malice Senior Member Join Date: May 11, 2009 Location: Phoenix Posts: 4,580	I agree with you guys. The size would be wonderful if it were a 9mm... I have no interest at all in a .380. I think that trend is mostly over. They should have built some competition for the Shield. I can't say that I'm that bummed about it though. The Shield is a GREAT little gun. __________________ Handguns: 2x Glock 19.4 \| Glock 26.4 \| HK USP 9 \| HK P2000 \| HK VP9 SK \| HK P30 \| CZ Shadow 2 \| CZ P-10 C \| CZ P-07 \| CZP-01 \| S&W 360PD Rifles: DDM4 \| SGL 21 \| SAM7K \| Draco \| PSA PDW SBR \| ASA Side-Charger SBR \| CZ Scorpion K SBR \| Aero M4E1 9" 300blk SBR \| Angstadt Jack9 SBR \| Savage Mark II FV-SR Shotguns: Mossberg 590A1 20" SP \| Mossberg Shockwave

December 26, 2013, 02:26 PM	#123
thedudeabides Senior Member Join Date: August 22, 2012 Posts: 1,031	I already have a full size tank HK45 that is better than any full-sized brick can hope to be, and a stable of 1911s that will outshoot any "target" Block. ...and Block 42? They could have just made a proper single stack 9mm. Glock is late to the party. __________________ OK, so not all plastic guns are bad

December 26, 2013, 02:45 PM	#125
seeker_two Senior Member Join Date: August 31, 2002 Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX) Posts: 2,169	As a direct competitor to the Ruger LC380 & Walther PK380, it could work. But I do hope a 9mm & .40 version is close behind. __________________ Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0......