|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 14, 2012, 04:06 PM | #101 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
What about a Ruger No1 in 25acp?
|
November 14, 2012, 04:30 PM | #102 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,834
|
^ lol never heard of a Ruger #1.
|
November 14, 2012, 04:36 PM | #103 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 16, 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 432
|
a 25 ACP Ruger #1 would be a real conversation piece.
__________________
Always looking for a good hunt! |
November 14, 2012, 06:24 PM | #104 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2007
Location: "Undisclosed Bunker"
Posts: 1,464
|
Don't Completely Dismiss the Venerable 25acp...
I use one as a BUG just about everyday (though I keep meaning to get a small .380 as the size difference is minimal anymore). The following story (verified 100% true) will make you think:
http://smallestminority.blogspot.com...ing-power.html
__________________
NRA Life Member “A free people ought...to be armed..." ―George Washington |
November 14, 2012, 06:55 PM | #105 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
Quote:
A 25 acp may be very cool in a Ruger #1. I'm thinking 5000 fps (sic) |
|
November 14, 2012, 07:47 PM | #106 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Posts: 826
|
The only cartridges with which I have become disenchanted are those which are touted by certain individuals as the "be all and end all"....or something like that.
I more or less refer to the phenomenon I call "magnum creep". In the old days, a 30-30 or 30-06, etc, etc, was sufficient to kill deer. Then, the magnum craze began. Suddenly, nothing less than a 300 Win. mag or 7mm mag, etc, etc. would do. Then, the magnum market exploded with all kinds of "new" and silly (yes, I said "silly") cartridge variations, because whitetail deer had (apparently) suddenly evolved to be equipped with armour plating. A bunch of nonsense, IMO. The same has happened with handguns and handgun cartridges. The lowly old 38 Special now couldn't penetrate a T-shirt....according to many... even though it was apparently perfectly adequate to stop bad guys for decades (and those bad guys don't wear any more clothes now than before...and have NOT evolved to have armour plating, either). The 9mm Para will now only bounce off a bad guy, like a tennis ball on a sidewalk (eyes rolling). Only a 40 S&W, 10 mm auto, or bigger will now do (again, eyes rolling). Next year, only a 50 S&W or a 480 Ruger will be big enough. What's next, a 20mm cannon ? A 120mm fin-stabilised, discarding sabot, high velocity, spent uranium tipped penetrator......for home defense (or concealed carry) ??? This trend is SILLY. Period. The most important issue is TRAINING and SHOT PLACEMENT. It ALWAYS has been.....and ALWAYS will be. Period. So, with what cartridges am I disenchanted ? Actually none - I don't blame the cartridge - I blame the ninny who is obsessed with it. OK, so I am fully aware that I'll now get FLAMED to death by all of the lovers and defenders of the "bigger is now absolutely imperative" trend. So, go ahead.....let me have it (right in the kisser) ! It should be good for a laugh..... |
November 14, 2012, 08:14 PM | #107 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
Quote:
|
|
November 15, 2012, 02:29 PM | #108 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
||
November 17, 2012, 08:31 AM | #109 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 1,819
|
.45 ACP. It lost it's luster over the years. When I was younger, and read and heard all the praise given the .45 cal 230 grain bullet as a "magic one shot, manstopper", I thought it was THE answer. Not to take anything away from it (I still love the .45 ACP and the 1911A1), but 35 some years later, after owning & shooting hundereds of guns, calibers, etc. and hunting / trapping, the importance of shot placement & skill now trump caliber as far as I am concerned.
In an armed conflict, I would place my money on, and be more concerned about, a cool headed marksman armed with a .22 LR or .380 ACP pistol, as oppossed to a self proclaimed combat expert, "tactical" armchair based, internet warrior carrying a .45 ACP or .40 S&W any day of the week. Last edited by shurshot; November 17, 2012 at 08:37 AM. |
November 17, 2012, 08:37 AM | #110 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
|
How about a skilled marksman who is calm and cool armed with a 45acp? That sounds good to me.
__________________
Jim Page Cogito, ergo armatum sum |
November 17, 2012, 11:38 AM | #111 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Posts: 458
|
9mm. Highly over rated but I shoot it a lot because you can buy the surplus brass very inexpensively.
|
November 17, 2012, 04:32 PM | #112 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 631
|
I have lost my interest in 357 Sig. When I first got into shooting I loved the idea of it but after getting experience with shooting a lot of different calibers I grew to dislike it because of how loud it was as well as how expensive it is compared to most other calibers.
|
November 18, 2012, 01:43 PM | #113 |
Member
Join Date: November 13, 2012
Posts: 31
|
9mm "tepid performance"?
I recently replaced a .357mag HD gun with a 9mm HD gun. With my glock's 5.35" barrel, and the ammo I use for HD, 9mm is coming out with roughly 500 ft-lbs. of muzzle energy (alongside many .40 loads and some .45 loads in 4" guns). I used 2 HD loadings in the .357: a 125gr SJHP (525ft-lbs), and 125gr golden saber (430ft-lbs). My current choice, 115gr 9mm corbon coming out at about 1400fps/500ft-lbs, is "on par" with the .357 loads I was using. Granted my .357 was a 4" gun, and the porting meant only about 3.25" of "meaningful" barrel. So the 9mm has a 2" barrel advantage. As a browning locked breech type auto, it's recoil is extremely manageable, it's 100% reliable, I added a light and a grip-filling weight for balance, shot-to-shot time is competition-fast, the trigger breaks clean as a trigger can possibly break (thank you Dremmel), accuracy is 1"/25m, 19rds instead of 8, ammo is cheap, and it's not nearly as loud as the ported .357 I wish everything I owned was that kind of tepid. I could have gotten a .40 for the same price as the 9, but I like to practice a lot. And 9mm is still significantly cheaper to shoot. I fully understand why someone in the military or law enforcement would want larger than a 9mm. But I don't plan on having to shoot intruders through car firewalls, nor use ball ammo. Military needs a sidearm that will drop someone with ball ammo (they should always use a .45, nothing less), Police need to sometimes shoot through cars or other cover (.40 is probably the minimum they should use), civilian home defense though? it just needs to make a thumb sized hole in 12" of ballistic gelatin, and have enough sectional density to go through bone obstacles. And it's actually a bonus if the round doesn't go through a burglar, 3 walls, and the neighbor's dog (or worse). ergo, 9mm is "great" for HD. At least in a full sized gun, with proper ammo. and as others have mentioned: shot placement > caliber I'm completely with you on the .25acp though. very pointless round. I'd think a .22LR would be better (and obviously cheaper). |
November 20, 2012, 09:30 PM | #114 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 1,819
|
Jimpage; A "skilled marksman with a .45 ACP" you say? Hell, I'm running in the other direction and FAST!
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|