The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 23, 2011, 12:20 PM   #1
toolmankan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
1975 Citori Fixed Choke Barrel Numbers...Mean?

I have a 1 and a 3 marked on either barrel of my 1975 citori. I believe 3 is modified (from other posts), but can't seem to find any other information of this.
Thanks.
toolmankan is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 12:50 PM   #2
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
Here's a chart showing choke markings. Browning uses a * system

http://www.hallowellco.com/choke_chart.htm
oneounceload is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 12:54 PM   #3
jaguarxk120
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,619
Do you have any asterisk's on the barrels? Usually Browning marks the barrels with a number of asterisk's and a dot or "$" symbol. The combination denotes the barrel's choke.
jaguarxk120 is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 12:56 PM   #4
toolmankan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
Nope, I've got an actual 1 stamped on the top barrel, and a 3 stamped on the bottom barrel. It's a 1975 model 12 gauge citori.
toolmankan is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 01:50 PM   #5
ocharry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2006
Posts: 685
i have one of those,,i think i bought it in the summer of "75" it is choked improved and modified,,, and the designation is **- and **

IIRC those marks are on the left side of the barrels at the chamber,,visible when you break the gun open

my .02

ocharry
__________________
The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim." - Lt. Col. Jeff Cooper, USMC
ocharry is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 02:22 PM   #6
toolmankan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
yes, marked on the left side of the barrel. however, only visible when the fore stock is removed. A "1" on the top barrel, and a "3" on the bottom barrel. This is the 28" special steel barrel that shoots 3" shells.
toolmankan is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 02:45 PM   #7
zippy13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
My guess is full over modified -- a fairly common combination. The tighter chock for the longer second shot. I could be a simple as the folks making the guns for Browning didn't have any asterisk stamps in the early days.
zippy13 is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 05:07 PM   #8
toolmankan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
That's my guess, but I wanted to know for sure. I would like to see what the breakdown of each number is. I've heard of a 3 and 5 barrel also with uncertainty as to what the chokes were there as well.
toolmankan is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 05:10 PM   #9
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
If you open that chart I linked to, you will see most of the various choke markings used by a variety of companies
oneounceload is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 06:22 PM   #10
toolmankan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
yea, i read through it. However that states a skeet and improved, and I've heard from several folks that the 3 is a modified. I appreciate everyone's input....still looking for a browning specific chart if anyone has one, or a link to one.
thanks.
toolmankan is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 06:26 PM   #11
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Or you could just measure the bore at the muzzle with a vermeer caliper?

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 07:17 PM   #12
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
Measuring the bores and then the chokes is the second best way.

Patterning your gun is the BEST way - it doesn't matter what the barrel says - it matters what your barrels do with the loads you are shooting through it
oneounceload is offline  
Old January 23, 2011, 08:46 PM   #13
zippy13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
Quote:
still looking for a browning specific chart
The Hallowell chart, referenced by oneounceload, shows the same Browning star code choke markings as other references like Briley. The Citori in question doesn't have typical Browning markings.

A gun maker can chose to label his chokes in two ways: consider cylinder bore as his start (Perazzi marks cylinder bore with an O and full with a 9), or use your tightest choke as your start (Browning typical uses one star for full and three for cylinder, or, in the case of the early Citori, a number 1 instead of one star). Other makers stamp the actual diameter of the choke like 18.4 (in mm's). Traditional UK makers may mark chokes in quarters (0/4=cyl; 1/4=imp cyl; 2/4=mod; 3/4=imp mod and 4/4=full). USofA makers typically just spell out the choke markings. It you find an old Winchester with "FULL" marked on the barrel, there's no questions.
zippy13 is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 12:18 PM   #14
ocharry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2006
Posts: 685
toolmankan, my old Citori is the field model,,26",3"chambers,12 gauge and I am pretty sure i got it in the late spring or early summer of 75,, all those years ago,,IIRC,,seems I recall it was in the $230-250 price range I gave for it. It will go to my grandson one of these days and I am sure it will last his lifetime too!!

I am curious to your markings and maybe you have a transition model??

Didn't browning make that change over somewhere in late 73 to early 74??

From Belgian to Japan??

As for the quality of the Japanese guns,,the one I have has been used a lot,,still tight,,never had a problem,,I've used it for everything,,lol

Good luck figuring this out ,,if you really want to know measure the muzzle and then put it on the pattern board,,,the board does not lie,,lol

ocharry
__________________
The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim." - Lt. Col. Jeff Cooper, USMC

Last edited by ocharry; January 27, 2011 at 12:18 PM.
ocharry is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 02:21 PM   #15
BigJimP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
Like others advised - I think your answer is easily found by measuring the barrels vs the amout of constriction in the choke area for each barrel..

The Citori went into production in 1973 - and from 1973 thru 1975 they didn't even have a set nomenclature for the serial numbers other than an H and an N for 12 and 20ga - but then, they mixed in some J's for both gagues ..../ so they had a variety of conventions when they got production of that gun started - before they got it standardized in 1976.

But it seems odd that they would stray from their typical "star"markings on the chokes. I'm wondering if you might have some kind of an after-market barrel on that receiver ?? Is the barrel plainly marked Browning ??
BigJimP is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 06:18 PM   #16
toolmankan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
yep. All original. I'll post of pic of it in a bit.
toolmankan is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 07:11 PM   #17
BigJimP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
Interesting ....learn something new every day ....
BigJimP is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 07:18 PM   #18
eddyb74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 222
Another thing you can do is check the muzzle with a dime and see if it corresponds with the numbers. The dime will not go into a full choke, will just go into a modified, and will have plenty of space around an improved cylinder.
eddyb74 is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 07:43 PM   #19
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Another thing you can do is check the muzzle with a dime and see if it corresponds with the numbers. The dime will not go into a full choke, will just go into a modified, and will have plenty of space around an improved cylinder.
MAYBE that works on certain barrel diameters, but one must remember that a 12 can vary by .015 for bore diameters, so a dime is not necessarily a good indicator - falls in place like measuring LOP by putting the stock in the crook of your elbow
oneounceload is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 08:06 PM   #20
eddyb74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 222
I didn't mean it to be an "end all, way to check". Just a quick reference. It works on my 3 12 ga. of varying makes.
eddyb74 is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 08:06 PM   #21
BigJimP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
Many Skeet and Trap clubs - have bore gagues - that you can borrow / or ask one of the members to give you a hand and take some measurements.

It just takes a few minutes.
BigJimP is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 09:57 PM   #22
toolmankan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
Here's a pic of the numbers as stamped on the barrel.....ok, nevermind. I keep getting an "upload failed message" ANy thoughts on what's going on there? I've uploaded before (other sites) with no problems...

All of the serial numbers match on the gun...from the fore stock, barrel, butt to the barrel. Still looking for some historical knowledge of the use of numbers and their corresponding meaning. I think the top is a modified, and the bottom is an improved....but it might be the top is a full and the bottom modified. What it is doesn't actually matter, the pattern does and I understand that. Just looking for the history of it as I find it fascinating. I've had this gun for years and shoot it well...never knew that it was a 1975 until this week when I decided to run the serial number. Got me interested in the numbers on the barrel and that history after I read the history on brownings website (which doesn't designate this numbering system...although I might email browning) and read up on some internet sites that have other info on the older citori's.

THanks for all the interest and input!!!!
toolmankan is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 09:39 AM   #23
johnbt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
"Still looking for some historical knowledge of the use of numbers and their corresponding meaning."

Me too. I've been around guns for 50+ years and on line for 10 or 12 and all I've never run across a numbered Browning system. I love a good detective story.

JT
johnbt is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 09:55 AM   #24
johnbt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,004
On second thought, I decided that the numbers must be a carryover to the early Citoris from a (the?) system used by Miroku on the Miroku-marked guns or the guns they made for Charles Daly before FN and Miroku bought out Browning in '77 iirc.

Anyway, I was wrong. According to Wisner's, Miroku used a *- system similar to Browning's.

http://www.wisnersinc.com/additional...kusprings.html

Nuts.
johnbt is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 09:59 AM   #25
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
Maybe they are aftermarket barrels by a firm who uses a different system?

I have known a few folks who have had Simmons and Baker make barrels for guns before.......?????????
oneounceload is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.12946 seconds with 8 queries