|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 24, 2013, 08:01 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2007
Location: Ory-gun
Posts: 508
|
Would you support mandatory firearm education?
im getting alot of feedback from people that are middle of the road gun people and anti gun people about how "any uneducated shmuck can go buy a gun" there are lots of people out there going and buying guns because of all this gun-ban hype. and many of them wouldn't be able to tell you what end the bullet come out of. would you support a law that says before you may purchase a firearm you must take a hunters education, or self defense type class that shows how to operate a firearm and be safe in general with one? im a bout as pro gun as one gets, and i would support something like this. thoughts?
__________________
Molon Labe |
January 24, 2013, 08:12 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Not a "mandatory" program
Quote:
Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
|
January 24, 2013, 08:13 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Depends on the content, requirements and politics.
Should everyone understand safety of any potential instrument of disaster / death, sure, that's reasonable. Should everyone who looks at a gun have to attend the Diane Feinstein School of Politically Correct Shooting, hardly.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
January 24, 2013, 08:23 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
It depends on how and what is implemented. I, personally, think that a basic firearms safety course, such as what is taught in a hunter's safety course, would be a good thing to incorporate into the curriculum of public high schools. While I'm sure that many anti's would tear their hair out over their children being taught about guns, that argument doesn't carry much weight with me since we've already incorporated other controversial subjects such as Darwinism and sex education into school curricula.
|
January 24, 2013, 08:28 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2010
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 1,863
|
I always thought it was odd that I had it browbeat into me that sex waas bad, but if you were going to have it before marriage, here is how you do it safely. And a decent Driver's Ed, but nothing about guns other than
"OMG! they are death rays!" all roled into the same freshman health class. my only concern with "mandatory" safety training is it can quickly become an end run around the Constitution as a form of back door gun control.
__________________
NRA Life Member Read my blog! "The answer to any caliber debate is going to be .38 Super, 10mm, .357 Sig or .41 Magnum!" |
January 24, 2013, 08:31 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Quote:
|
|
January 24, 2013, 08:32 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Posts: 686
|
Yep, should be required to graduate from high school.
|
January 24, 2013, 08:36 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2010
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 1,863
|
I've railed to everyone that would listen that the Rifle Merit Badge, along with Cooking and Wildnerness Survival should all be made required for Eagle Scout.
__________________
NRA Life Member Read my blog! "The answer to any caliber debate is going to be .38 Super, 10mm, .357 Sig or .41 Magnum!" |
January 24, 2013, 08:43 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
When it becomes, law
You have to understand how it works. When you make it mandatory, it becomes a law. That give power over to a local or federal Goverment and out of your control. You then have penalties associated with that law and it has to be enforced and abused. Making it voluntary keeps it under your control.
During my years of teaching Hunter Ed. we have seen two instances where a judge, required a person to attend one of our courses. We were not given any details as to who the person was or what crime he had commited. We only knew that they were there. I have not problem with this but it wasn't our call anyway. .... Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
January 24, 2013, 08:43 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2007
Location: Ory-gun
Posts: 508
|
HEEEEEYYYYY!!!! the high school requirement thing is a great idea! but thats wishful thinking at best. it will never happen. but maybe with all this media attention on guns i guess anything is possible. my only fear would be that just as some of you have said, it would get rolled into a "guns are bad MmmmKKaaaayyy, dont touch them and certainly dont buy them" type brainwashing.
Pahoo: i dont see how taking a class would turn into a control type situation? an ideal class would be one where there is a test at the end and if you dont pass, you must take it again. you can take the class as many times as necessary until you pass the test. make the class a small fee (just like a concealed carry class does) so it gives you the incentive to pass the first time. plus its a revenue generator for the state! Win win, anti's have on less thing to complain about, and we still get to keep our rights!
__________________
Molon Labe Last edited by Mausermolt; January 24, 2013 at 08:48 PM. |
January 24, 2013, 08:46 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: Sweet Home
Posts: 886
|
Yes, I think it should be a required course in High School or Middle School along with English, Social Studies and Driver's Ed. Other than that, no.
__________________
Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. |
January 24, 2013, 08:47 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Set up a syllabus in the school system, and grandfather those who are already legal adults, and I could back this.
Otherwise, money or free time could become insurmountable obstacles for the poor or for single parents, even if one assumes no state or local government would deliberately create scheduling restrictions. |
January 24, 2013, 08:54 PM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
What is mandatory education supposed to accomplish?
Let's back up a step. ALL the current furor is due to a sick kid who shot up an elementary school. In order to get there, he MURDERED his own mother and STOLE her firearms. Background checks would not have helped. It has been documented that all the firearms were purchased legally. Connecticut has an AWB in effect. The Bushmaster was, by legal definition, NOT an "assault weapon." Required licenses wouldn't have helped. Criminals don't apply for carry permits. Mandatory education? The kid WAS educated. His mother had taught him firearms safety and marksmanship, and taught him well. Does it really matter if a mass murderer accidentally sweeps a potential victim before killing him/her? Don't weaken. We ... do ... not ... need ... more ... gun ... laws. Quote:
Why should I need a piece of paper to exercise a RIGHT guaranteed to me by the Constitution? Last edited by Aguila Blanca; January 24, 2013 at 08:59 PM. |
|
January 24, 2013, 09:01 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I was not thinking about "weakening." I was thinking training programs in high schools would add numbers to our side.
Of course, we are in no danger of the administration suggesting that approach... |
January 24, 2013, 09:05 PM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 21, 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 150
|
More laws, that's what we need!
|
January 24, 2013, 09:13 PM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Firearm education = good. Mandating firearm education = bad.
I have no interest in inviting government to set more hurdles for law-abiding citizens.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
January 24, 2013, 09:14 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
"More laws, that's what we need!"
Yes...for the children! |
January 24, 2013, 09:17 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 876
|
NO!
|
January 24, 2013, 09:19 PM | #19 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: Sweet Home
Posts: 886
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. |
||
January 24, 2013, 09:27 PM | #20 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
What I would support is offering an elective firearms safety course in our schools, perhaps as a unit in Phys Ed. When i was growing up, they offered "Arkansas Outdoors" at my high school. Among other things, students learned to shoot .22s.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
January 24, 2013, 09:41 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: January 19, 2013
Posts: 46
|
Isn't that a requirement in Israel?
Sent from my Desire HD |
January 24, 2013, 09:50 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Location: Vernors and orange barrels.
Posts: 661
|
I was bored and not involved in high school activities mostly because I was a gun enthusiasts my whole life and enjoyed shooting. Of course school didn't offer such a activity at least not back in the early 90's. if they had gun education and actual live range fire It would have been awesome. But reality bites.
|
January 24, 2013, 09:51 PM | #23 |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
"...shall not be infringed."
Hmmmm.....I sure as hell don't see anything about "mandatory firearm education" in the 2nd Amendment from this Armchair Quarterback's eye...
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
January 24, 2013, 10:10 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 2008
Location: Live Free or Die state
Posts: 259
|
No.
it would be great if every firearm owner took his/her responsibility very seriously, and obtained as much training as they could afford/need. But many buy a pistol, maybe shoot it once,then lock it in the nightstand. And some people are plain stupid.
But we all share the same right, that shall not be infringed. Make it mandatory, as others point out, and the govt then controls it. Once they control it, they can make the bar as high as they want, or outright ban it. Nope.
__________________
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness... How pathetic." - - Ted Nugent "Cogito, Ergo Armitum Sum" - (I Think, Therefore I Am Armed)- - anon. |
January 24, 2013, 10:13 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Location: Vernors and orange barrels.
Posts: 661
|
Good point.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|