|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 7, 2012, 10:10 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
|
Quote:
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull. all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well... |
|
September 7, 2012, 10:24 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
September 7, 2012, 10:30 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
|
this ammo is hot but its not out of spec for a 357 magnum. The ballistic tables are accurate.
Buffalo bore stats are pretty accurate ask around here if you like. Even if they boost the FPS by 100 fps its still doing over 500 foot pounds of energy at 200 yards. https://www.buffalobore.com/index.ph...t_detail&p=102 in fact I can bust out 500 foot pounds of energy at 100 yards from my 6 inch handgun and I have an old post around here with pictures of the chronograph to prove it. 1800 fps at 10 feet from chronograph. .14 BC 125 grain bullet While the 357 magnum is no where near ideal and is actually very weak for a deer round it is possable... most of my deer have been taken with a 357 magnum 1894 trapper (typically 158 grain bullets though I have played with 180) p.s. sorry if I seem defencive I am just excited that this is a point that I can prove.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull. all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well... Last edited by Deja vu; September 7, 2012 at 10:48 PM. |
September 7, 2012, 10:52 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Thats pretty pricy. 20 rounds for $28.
I'll stick to my cast bulles, I can load a box of 50 for $1.60 I hunt with Model 70s anyway. But I have killed moose and buffalo with my loads out of a 4 inch Model 28, don't see the justification for Buffalo Bore, even if they work as advertized.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
September 7, 2012, 10:57 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
|
I actually agree... while its fun to flaunt numbers in the end dead is dead. Shot placement is 100X more important than power. My grandfather talks about killing a white tale with a 22 rifle when he was a kid and laws where not so strict.
any way my original point was that a 30 carbine should be fine so long as the shooter does there part.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull. all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well... |
September 10, 2012, 03:56 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2006
Location: East Texas
Posts: 334
|
Took my 1st whitetail buck with a Ruger BH in .30 carbine. Used a 110 gn SP.
|
|
|