The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 21, 2006, 01:48 PM   #1
dmented692006
Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2006
Posts: 60
boar hunting - will this do?

im planning on goin down to florida at the end of Feb to go boar hunting. i just bought a marlin 45-70 lever action to take with me. the bullets the guy at the gun shop sold me are 300 grain winchester super x cxp2. i read the back of the box and it said they are made for thin skinned and light muscle animals. the guy says they will kill a boar but i dont know. what im tryin to ask is, will that bullet kill a 400 pound boar easily or do i need a bigger bullet?
dmented692006 is offline  
Old January 21, 2006, 02:01 PM   #2
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
The odds are they'll work, but it sounds like they're more intended for such as deer, and have a rather thin jacket to allow expansion. That doesn't mean the lead core won't go through a hog, though.

If you want "insurance", find a load with a bit heavier jacket. Some of the .45-70 aficianados can give you better specific info than I can.

For your purposes, a .45 is a .30 that's already expanded. You have plenty enough gun.

Art
Art Eatman is offline  
Old January 21, 2006, 02:36 PM   #3
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
The Winchester Partition 300 gr will do the job. I'm much happier with these than the other 300 gr bullets.
mete is offline  
Old January 21, 2006, 02:46 PM   #4
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,899
400 or 405 grain bullet loads are better for hog. The 300 grain loads are a modern deer hunter's load, to reduce recoil and flatten trajectory. The 300g loads are more lightly-constructed to expand on deer.

If the 300g loads were all you had and you had no chance to improve upon them, I wouldn't wave off a man from hunting hog with them. But since you're outfitting yourself with a task-specific rifle (great choice) and loads in advance of hunting, why not get the more optimal loads? I'm not saying that you need to go buy some $50/box loads of Buffalo Bore or Garrett cartridges-- I'm just saying that you'll get better penetration with the 400 or 405 grain loads.

Don't forget to sight-in, and practice from field positions!

Do you have a good receiver peep sight installed yet? If not, may I suggest the XS (formerly Ashley Outdoors) peep sight? The thing is bulletproof, mounts on the extant rear scope mount holes, and improves accuracy quite a bit without compromising speed.

Good luck.
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________
Long Path is offline  
Old January 21, 2006, 02:50 PM   #5
Rich Lucibella
Staff
 
Join Date: October 6, 1998
Location: South Florida
Posts: 10,229
They may not be the uber-tactical best for hog, but I think they'll do just fine. The caliber and action you chose is ideal...good show!

Once you decide you truly love that 45-70, you'll probably want to buy or load a couple hundred rounds to avoid having to rezero every time someone sells you a different brand/lot. If buying, I HIGHLY recommend the Buffalo Bore 405 grain JFN. http://www.buffalobore.com

Oh, and replace the Marlin butt pad with a Pachmeyr Decellerator. Trust me on this with the 45-70; it'll make a world of difference in your enjoyment.
Rich
__________________
S.W.A.T. Magazine
Weapons, Training and Tactics for the Real World
Join us at TFL or at AR15.com or on Facebook
Rich Lucibella is offline  
Old January 21, 2006, 03:15 PM   #6
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,899
Quote:
Oh, and replace the Marlin butt pad with a Pachmeyr Decellerator. Trust me on this with the 45-70; it'll make a world of difference in your enjoyment.
Rich
Rich, do you find that Decellerator pad to be substantually better than the ventilated buttpad on the 1895GS? It does a pretty good job on its own:
But you've got a lot more experience with outfitting different .45-70's than I do...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1895GS buttpad.JPG (12.7 KB, 378 views)
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________
Long Path is offline  
Old January 21, 2006, 06:06 PM   #7
dmented692006
Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2006
Posts: 60
thank you for the quick replies. i bought the gun used and it came with a peep sight and i think it has an aftermarket recoil pad. what are some good brands of ammo you would recommend? i know buffalo bore and garret but what about the ammo on cabelas...pmc, ten x cowboy ammo, magtech,GOEX, or ultramax. ive never heard of any of them and they are all pretty cheap so im weary. thanks for all the help.
dmented692006 is offline  
Old January 22, 2006, 12:17 PM   #8
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,899
Actually, I'm fairly impressed with most Magtech ammo as a good value, for pistol practice ammo. That said, you've got a new rifle. You're going on a hog hunt. Spring for some decent ammo. (No, I didn't say Mega Premium! )

There are no flies on the good ol' Remington Express green box 45-70 Govt R4570G 405grain SP ammo. (And if you get into reloading, they sell the bullets.)
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________
Long Path is offline  
Old January 23, 2006, 10:14 PM   #9
sirlonewolf
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2006
Posts: 9
Hi dmented692006 ...........you mentioned going to Florida for the hog hunt. Are you using one of the many outfitters here or going to wild or private land? I live in Florida. And hog hunting is a favorite of mine. I have been twice in the last two weeks. Both times I took nice hogs with my Python .357 magnum using standard 158 grain JHP. I have one several occasions taken hogs with one shot from my bow. Unless you are going to one of the pro outfitters here your four hundred pound hog although not beyond the realm of imagination is still unlikely. Most will be in the neighborhood of 150 to 250 lbs. Your 45-70 will more than suffice.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg Ian Hog Hunt 027-01 700.jpg (86.7 KB, 292 views)
sirlonewolf is offline  
Old January 24, 2006, 07:28 AM   #10
AussieHunter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 22, 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 13
I use a Marlin 45-70 for pigs and buffalo here in Oz. the .45-70 works great although is a bit under powered for buff, I use 400gr projies in loads i make up myself.

Well worth it a great little rifle.

I also use a .416Rigby on pigs which sorts them out better at longer ranges
AussieHunter is offline  
Old January 26, 2006, 06:30 PM   #11
dmented692006
Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2006
Posts: 60
my brother and i are going to use an outfitter my uncle recommended, its called out west farms i think.
dmented692006 is offline  
Old January 26, 2006, 06:39 PM   #12
Rich Lucibella
Staff
 
Join Date: October 6, 1998
Location: South Florida
Posts: 10,229
Quote:
Rich, do you find that Decellerator pad to be substantually better than the ventilated buttpad on the 1895GS? It does a pretty good job on its own:
See this here, Matt? Now you have me questioning my own internal myths. I cannot honestly answer your question as to the Marlin 45-70 from personal knowledge....mine was built up with a Decelerator from jump.

However, long guns that HAVE stung me, whether the light .338 Blaser or certain O/U 12 gages, have benefited greatly from the Pachmayr....so has the NEC single shot 45-70. I've been trying to test out a LimbSaver but can't get the Texan to put one on.

So, the long and short of it is: if YOU say the stock pad is fine on the Marlin, I'll go with that.....course, I don't shoot that, there MaggyTech ammo!
Rich
__________________
S.W.A.T. Magazine
Weapons, Training and Tactics for the Real World
Join us at TFL or at AR15.com or on Facebook
Rich Lucibella is offline  
Old January 27, 2006, 02:04 PM   #13
whiskey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2000
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 431
Sirlonewolf, haven’t you read on the forums that the .357mag is not enough gun for a hog? You MUST have at least a .44mag at a minimum.

I am kidding of course. I have seen many hogs killed D.R.T. with a .357mag. I happen to carry a .44mag cause that what my favorite gun happens to be chambered in.

The 45/70 with just about any bullet will do wonderful.
__________________
"So he cocked both his pistols, spit in the dirt and walked out in to the street."
whiskey is offline  
Old January 27, 2006, 04:01 PM   #14
Long Path
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 1999
Location: N. Texas
Posts: 5,899
Quote:
So, the long and short of it is: if YOU say the stock pad is fine on the Marlin, I'll go with that.....course, I don't shoot that, there MaggyTech ammo!
Well, I was pretty impressed with the one that came on JG's Guide Gun, but I don't know what Marlin puts on their other 1895s.
As I said (and as I know you read, good sir), I'm impressed with the "Maggie Tech" pistol ammo for practice, but would suggest going a little higher quality for actual hunting.

Can't get the big crewcut knuckle-dragger to outfit your pig-thumpers (like your .50 AE) with a LimbSaver? Probably just as well-- if you made your rifles even easier to shoot, you'd get even less ammo back!
__________________
"Welcome to The Firing Line, a virtual community dedicated to the discussion and advancement of responsible firearms ownership."T.F.L. Policy Page
Will you, too, be one who stands in the gap? ____________
Long Path is offline  
Old January 27, 2006, 05:13 PM   #15
Pointer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,559
I have to say no...

A thin jacket bullet will tend to disintegrate when it hits tough hide ot bone or sinew and therefore fail in penetration. (I've heard of this happening on bears.)

If you have a partition or a premium bullet which is well-known for weight-retention, then it might work out OK.

In any case it would be borderline... and borderline "don't get it".
__________________
.
"Political correctness is tyranny with a happy face." Charlton Heston

30-06 FOREVER
Pointer is offline  
Old January 27, 2006, 05:23 PM   #16
Wingbone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2005
Posts: 136
I took a 250 pounder with my bow with 125 grain muzzy broadheads.
Wingbone is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08585 seconds with 11 queries