|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 31, 2012, 07:11 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2011
Posts: 6
|
Why Does Lyman Not Like Me ?
OK, I got a new Lyman 49th Reloading Manual for Christmas. I have been reloading for a few years and have read my Lee manual front & back. So , I start perusing my new Lyman manual and find out that I am not supposed to use brass picked up from the range. Only new brass , for my safety, so I will know the history of the brass. Bummer! I then start looking for some of the calibers that I reload for like 7.5 x 54 MAS --not there ; 7.5 x 55 Swiss--not there, How about something for that old Nagant revolver I got from J&G--not there, How about an 8 x 57 Mauser load with a 198 gr or 200 grain bullet--not there.
I am not trashing the manual because it does have some very nice features like they highlight the load that was most accurate ,for them. That gives a guy a good place to start. Also they have a lot of cast bullet loads which is very nice if you want to start casting your own, or use purchased cast bullets. I like the way the book is laid out and organized. I just have to wonder why they have been printing this book for over a hundred years but have no information on the calibers I mentioned. 7.5 MAS and 7.5 Swiss were, and still are ,widely used by two modern armies. And you just can't publish 8 X 57 Mauser loads with out including the 198 gr or 200 gr bullets. That's just not right! So does Lyman just not like C&R guys or what? Nuf said. Have a Happy New Year Everyone! NH |
December 31, 2012, 07:30 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 252
|
You think that's bad, every manual for every gun I own says not to shoot reloads in it.
__________________
JOIN THE NRA! |
December 31, 2012, 08:20 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 26, 2008
Posts: 472
|
All in all, I think the Lyman 49th manual is not what it shoud be, I always keep referring back to my old manuals for loads.
Just sayin. Smokeyloads |
December 31, 2012, 08:45 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,869
|
I dunno .... starting in 1969 and 4+2 editions later, my 7 Lyman manuals have only gotten better/more inclusive
-- especially when they issued additional all inclusive separate cast load books. Lyman is still my second GoTo source. My first has become and remains QuickLoad. If the readers want A-to-Zed/alpha-to-omega, only QuickLoad can start you there. |
December 31, 2012, 09:20 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2012
Location: Great Northwest
Posts: 222
|
I hear a lot of folks speak highly of the lyman 49th manual and seen it suggested more than any, I have thumbed thru it at stores enough to know that it won't be in my library. Take it for what it is and use the information the best you can
|
December 31, 2012, 09:30 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,161
|
The cast loads in the manual annoy me. I dont shoot cast bullets. Back in the day Lymans cast loads were in their cast manual and I wish they had left them there.
|
January 1, 2013, 02:41 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: October 2, 2012
Posts: 42
|
C Y A lawyer talk been reloading since early 50's & use Lyman and many others
|
January 1, 2013, 02:53 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 31, 2010
Location: Communist State of IL.
Posts: 1,562
|
Range pickup's are fine you need to monitor the brass for cracks, bulges and loose primer pockets no matter where you acquired the brass.
Keeping new brass in it's own lot is always a good idea just as I think sorting by head stamps is. Not all brass is the same nor do they all have the same lifespan. Even if you sort them by brand and head stamp you won't know the age of the cases so keep a close eye on them. I think the manuals all point you in the safest possible direction even though many that have reloaded range pickup's for decades don't hesitate loading them after sorting and inspecting them.
__________________
NRA Life Member, SAF Member |
January 1, 2013, 03:11 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2010
Location: Phoenix area
Posts: 361
|
I still refer to my 1980 Lyman manual for things that are not in the new one.
Mike
__________________
Mike Mattera - Tips For Mfg Video Training For CadCam Systems http://www.tipsforcadcam.com |
January 2, 2013, 06:46 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Hansen Idaho
Posts: 1,465
|
I use cast and jacketed bullets, so I like the Lyman manual. I also use range brass, and unless you are loading for a hunting rifle or a competition rifle I don't think there is much to worry about as far as sorting. I just keep an eye on the brass I am loading and make sure it is in spec, especially if it is a plinker like my AR.
__________________
* (Swinging club) Whack! whack! whack! * Nope, the old nag's still dead . (Capt Charlie) |
January 2, 2013, 08:03 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,161
|
I have actually had pressure issues switching between brass manufacturers. Capacities are different and sometimes drastically different.
|
January 3, 2013, 03:15 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,403
|
Quote:
As for the 49th... Yea, it's a bit of a disappointment. Compared to the 48th, they actually dropped quite a few cartridges, and added only a couple. Some of the data that they did keep for the 49th is still questionable. (I would cite an example, but my copies seem to have grown legs and run away. If you were my Lyman manuals, where would you hide? )
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
January 3, 2013, 08:23 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
I try to be as anal as possible in my reloading, & FIL trained me well... up until I started shooting CAS, I kept track of how many times a case had been loaded, & sorted my brass by manufacturer, & even by weight on a few of them, do my best to size to length within a couple .001's
... still do for most of my rifles yet, but shooting CAS, I often don't get back my original brass, so I stopped keeping track of how many reloads, & stopped sorting by brand on those calibers... most are light to mid loads anyway... but with the rifles, if I get to a certain amount of reloads ( varys by cartridge ) I start seeing split mouths or pressure signs at the web, with history, I know when to start paying particularly close attention to the cases when preping them for reloading... I don't have a new Lyman book, but all the more reason to have multiple manuals, as many cartridges as I reload, no manual seems to have them all...
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... |
January 3, 2013, 09:38 AM | #14 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,374
|
Don't blame the manual, blame the gift giver, who obviously didn't put enough thought into making sure what it offered is what you needed.
No loading manual is going to be, or can be, all things to all people and cover every possible cartridge and load combination. The fact that the 7.5x54 is still used by a major army isn't really germane. It's not really used that much HERE, in the United States. Yes, there are a few freaks, er... die hards... who load for it, but I'd suspect that there really aren't that many of you. It can take well over a year for a company to do the in-depth testing required to develop the loading data needed for a cartridge. It is not a simple process by any means, so in a lot of ways, especially with these older military surplus cartridges, it becomes a cost benefit exercise.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
January 3, 2013, 09:50 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 9,333
|
I do load 7.5 Swiss as well... but not often, & don't remember off the top of my head which manual had the load data though...
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust... |
January 3, 2013, 10:12 AM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,374
|
I believe that Hornady's manual still has data for 7.5 Swiss.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
January 3, 2013, 11:02 AM | #17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2011
Posts: 6
|
The Lee manual has loads for the 7.5 MAS and the 7.5 Swiss. I don't believe that they actually did any testing on the 7.5 MAS. I believe that they simply copied the 30-40 Krag load data and left it at that. Most anyone that loads for the 7.5 MAS will tell you that you can safely get better performance than the listed data in the Lee manual. I also agree that if you are competition shooting or going on a major hunting trip or you only use max loads that you should probably know the history of your brass. In the mean time I will continue to scrounge any usable brass I can find. ( unusable gets recycled $$). It is nice to have different books so you can see different views and techniques on how to do things and compare different load data. It is also nice to have the many reloading forums available on the internet for those odd ball calibers that the freaks load for
|
January 3, 2013, 05:19 PM | #18 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,403
|
Quote:
Since they aren't in the 'deleted' list, I'm guessing they're still in the 9th edition. Code:
9th Edition deleted cartridges (rifle)- 219 Zipper (moved to website) 219 Donaldson Wasp (moved to website) 7-30 Waters 7.92x33 Kurz Deleted cartridges (handgun)- 7.63 Mauser 300 Whisper (as a handgun cartridge) Quote:
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|