The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 14, 2015, 09:58 PM   #1
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
Colt 1903

I always wanted one of these but couldn't see paying $600 plus for a 50% gun. This one is reblued and I payed a reblued price. They didn't mess up the engraving when it was polished. It was probably over polished but at least the design didn't have sharp edges or corners. I like it and it will get shot. Reality is I traded my only other .32 auto (savage 1917) and had some ammo left over.

I knew about the grip scales being different and may just leave them that way. Type 3 made in 1923. The problem with such a high polish is it takes fingerprint way too easy. I will have to wait until next weekend to see how it shoots. I don't expect much. I am told that it has sights. I just can't find them

Two more posts with additional photos ( I think). Software has me stumped and I couldn't manage to attach more than one photo to my test post.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (124.2 KB, 162 views)
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 10:00 PM   #2
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
Second photo. You know, I used to be tech friendly.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (118.1 KB, 108 views)
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 14, 2015, 10:01 PM   #3
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
Engraving. Not too bad.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (100.8 KB, 96 views)
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 05:48 AM   #4
eastbank
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 2,450
i have one in the 351xxx range and it is a very well made pistol, it has sights but they are skimpy. however it is a defence pistol to me and i can hit a quart can at 20yds. i paid 325.00 for it and its in 90 percent condition with ex grips and original magizine. eastbank.
eastbank is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 07:10 AM   #5
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
Then I probably over paid for mine. I like it and it called to me. Still not sure why. I would have liked to have kept the Savage. It is my understanding that the Savage was the competition for the 1903 in its day. But that particular Savage had such an terrible trigger pull it wasnt fun to shoot.

Someone once said "You didn't pay too much you just bought too early". This one is for shooting so i dont feel too bad.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 08:25 AM   #6
Tidewater_Kid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 925
Nice looking pistol. I always figure I paid too much if I'm going to sell at a loss. I never sell!
Tidewater_Kid is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 08:43 AM   #7
reddog81
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,633
Looks good. Based on those pics I'd say whoever did the reblue knew what they were doing. All the stampings still look pretty crisp.
reddog81 is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 09:25 AM   #8
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
Kid,

I can rationalize even further. Even if sold or traded at a loss i figure the difference is what i paid for the use of the gun. We don't really own these things. They will outlast us and will be owned by somebody else eventually. I'm just paying to use it now.

Apparently some of the older versions had a high polish finish. But not this late in production. I agree that whoever did the re-blue knew what they were doing. There are only a couple of marks, very small, that were blued over and the trigger and safety (possibly the pins) should have been fire blue.

Overall I am pleased with the acquisition.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 10:27 AM   #9
RickB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,511
For a reblue, that gun looks very good.
The transition from the flat slide side to curved slide top is usually buffed completely away, as it's not an especially sharp transition even on original finish guns.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong.
RickB is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 10:55 AM   #10
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
I may yet get to shoot it today. sick kid so we aren't going to the Renaissance Festival today.

agreed about the soft transition in the design from the slide to the slide top helping the re-blue. In its originalm form it was pretty much melted.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 15, 2015, 09:56 PM   #11
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
It is not going to pass as original, but I have seen FAR worse looking guns than that one. From a collector's viewpoint, though, the Savage is less common than the Colt and the design is more interesting.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old March 16, 2015, 07:02 AM   #12
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
I agree on the Savage. It was a very interesting gun. I would have liked to have both but it wasn't fun to shoot due to a very stiff trigger. I used it for a partial trade on a near mint S&W 18-3 a couple of weeks ago.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 18, 2015, 11:31 PM   #13
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
I might just get to liking this Colt a little bit more. This was at 7 yards offhand. For what i could see of the sights this was a lot better than i expected.

It feels great in the hand and points well. I did have 2 fail to feeds in the first two mags. But after that it functioned well. (EDIT not sure why the photo rotated?) That is about 2 1/2"
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg getPart.jpeg (85.9 KB, 51 views)
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ

Last edited by johnm1; March 19, 2015 at 07:17 AM.
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 19, 2015, 12:27 AM   #14
Ricklin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: SW Washington state
Posts: 1,996
I traded a Colt for a Colt. My friend had the 1903, and I had a well used Police Positive Special. The guns were about even up condition wise. So we traded even up.

Accurate, and tucks away very nicely. My wife has laid claim to it, so I tucked the original grips away and put Rosewood grips on it for her.
__________________
ricklin
Freedom is not free
Ricklin is offline  
Old March 19, 2015, 02:55 AM   #15
hartcreek
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2014
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,549
I have had four of those savages three of em in .32 and one in 9mm Corto. Still carry One as a backup. They are easy to work on and I still have a bag of barrels frames and parts I am one part short of making a complete gun....but since I gave two of them to my niece one for her and her then boyfriend and now husband and the 9mm Corto to my nephew the guns are still in the family. The one I carry as a backup I had to fix as it went full auto one day. There is a Colt 1903 in .32 ACO sitting at the local Cabellas. It has been sitting there for more then a year with a $1000 price tag on it.
hartcreek is offline  
Old March 19, 2015, 07:30 AM   #16
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
I really liked the Savage. It was a neat little dsign but the trigger on that gun was terrible and i couldnt get anywhere close to this type of performance. As a locked breach it did have a bit more snap to it.

By the way, 15 yards was out of the question last night. the 1903 just doesnt have enough sight for my eyes.

Pricing on the 1903 are all over the board. Good examples are fetching over a thousand dollars on Gunbroker.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 19, 2015, 08:32 AM   #17
dahermit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
Quote:
They didn't mess up the engraving when it was polished.
Did you mean, "roll marks"?
dahermit is offline  
Old March 19, 2015, 09:51 AM   #18
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
Yes.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old March 20, 2015, 06:13 PM   #19
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
One has to feel sorry for guys like Elbert Searle and John Pedersen; every time they came up with a good, obvious and simple way to do something, they found that some guy from Utah had patented it and they had to use a complicated and convoluted way to do the same thing.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old March 25, 2015, 07:56 AM   #20
Ibmikey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Location: Now relocated to Texas
Posts: 2,943
I have a very early Savage and what a nicely engineered and beautifully built pistol, but next to my 1903 Colt it somehow looks dated. Both pistols are easy to shoot, the Colt is easier to conceal. For concealed carry there are much better choices available ie: size and caliber.
Ibmikey is offline  
Old March 25, 2015, 05:40 PM   #21
zachattack2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 28, 2015
Posts: 167
So how much did you get it for? $$
__________________
I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it - Clint Eastwood
zachattack2 is offline  
Old March 25, 2015, 08:06 PM   #22
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
It was a trade so it's hard to determine exactly what the value was for the Savage. I got $500 in trade value for the Savage and a mid 80's Charter Arms Pathfinder (22). I had $185 in the Savage and $180 in the Pathfinder. I added some cash to get a mint S&W model 18-3.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Old April 19, 2015, 07:58 PM   #23
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
I don't often have seller's remorse, but I replaced the Savage today. The last one was a 1917 made in 1920. I prefer the looks of the 1917 over the 1907. But the price was right in my price point @ $250.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ciejjvlspm...81%29.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3dammbtfgj...81%29.jpg?dl=0

the last one didnt have much finish left either.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ

Last edited by johnm1; April 19, 2015 at 08:29 PM.
johnm1 is offline  
Old April 19, 2015, 09:04 PM   #24
johnm1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 652
Serial number dates the pistol to 1913.
__________________
John M.
Mesa, AZ
johnm1 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.12529 seconds with 11 queries