The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 21, 2013, 10:43 AM   #1
mapsjanhere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
M88 8x57I (.318) reloading

I want to try a Gew 88, unmodified at .318. Now of course I can spend $150+ for the fitting RCBS custom dies, but I keep finding hints on people modifying a standard .323 set to seat the .318 bullets. Any help on how to do that?
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying.
mapsjanhere is offline  
Old February 21, 2013, 12:29 PM   #2
chiefr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 1,401
I would slug your bore first. I have a gew 88 that slugs .323
chiefr is offline  
Old February 21, 2013, 12:39 PM   #3
mapsjanhere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
Usually they got marked with an S if they got modified, this one is unmarked. But I will check nevertheless.
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying.
mapsjanhere is offline  
Old February 21, 2013, 02:14 PM   #4
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
That rifle of yours was made before WW1 and as such the metal in it is not of high quality.

I would be very cautious about shooting any oversized bullets in the thing and whatever you load, keep the pressures low.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old February 21, 2013, 02:42 PM   #5
oldpapps
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: Middle America
Posts: 518
I've got a Gew 88, it is marked with the 'S'.
I never got around to loading for it (too many more appealing loadings to work with). I figured that nice soft lead loading would be best for it. I would council you think strongly of lead loads.

http://thefiringline.com/forums/atta...1&d=1361475449

Mine is marked with the date of 1890 and armory dated 1914 and Turkish marking to boot. As good a Mauser's steel may have been, I'm chicken. Black powder weapon that is over a hundred years old, light/nice lead loadings and then with slower (more push than pop) powder.

Load with care,

OSOK
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 100_2860s.jpg (230.4 KB, 28 views)
oldpapps is offline  
Old February 21, 2013, 03:32 PM   #6
mapsjanhere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
Actually, the 88 was never a black powder gun, being developed specifically for the newfangled smokeless powder the French came up with. So I agree on the problems with the 88 - the metal being the least of it, which is why I want to reload low pressure rounds if I can solve the die issue.
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying.
mapsjanhere is offline  
Old February 21, 2013, 04:21 PM   #7
oldpapps
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: Middle America
Posts: 518
mapsjanhere,

I will defer to your wisdom. A counter to the Lebel, makes sense.

Enjoy,

OSOK
oldpapps is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09236 seconds with 9 queries